Talk:Top 100 ways to die

yeah, uh 40-31 could use some attention. that is all. --Sharkbait1986 00:13, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

You saying you don't like my Nazi Death Camp idea? --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 13:20, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

no, I'm just saying we need a #31-38 or so. ppl seem to be skipping over those.--Sharkbait1986 18:31, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm not. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:27, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

The List Ends Here!

Please don't put any ways to die below number -1. It ruins the -1 joke, plus we (well at least I) don't want this list to be infinite and end up being total garbage. -- Mitch 02:06, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Ummmm...yah...I'm gonna say this bluntly. #s 0 and -1 are crap. 0 can be moved to another number, and it may not get snipped off, but #-1 is really bad. I say get rid of them before someone gets rid of them for you. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 18:38, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

ZB is right... I was going to kill them both once we finally had 100...--<<>> 18:54, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, hardly anyone would get the point, and even less would find it funny. -- Mitch 06:46, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

What about....?

Maybe someone should rewrite this on another article as Worst 100 ways to die, so it could go on the lsit of the Worst 100 Lists of all time. --MaxPayne 01:55, 1 May 2009 (UTC)