||a solidly humorous article that provided a more than adequate amount of chuckles.
||great concept, despite similar articles (see mousetrap).
|Prose and formatting:
||no big problems, just a few redlinks. looks a little squished in the middle, maybe the template on the right could be trimmed & un-wide-ed.
||a proper amount of images that are well executed.
||excellent mix of encyclopedic tone with absurd facts.
||a very nicely done rewrite. if you're merely looking for it to be a solid article, your work is done. if you're going to go the extra mile or you're looking for a VFH, a little length couldn't hurt. maybe a section on a famous mass-escape from a zoo, or fossil evidence of gigantic flying radioactive toasters, or something.
||-- 23:16, 2 October 2007 (UTC)