## edit From VFH

**comment** This might do well with a retitle, giving the equation some subtler name, such as "The _____ Theorem" --monika 18:48, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

**Comment**Yes, but would you actually vote for it if it had a different title, or just like it slightly better? --**§****.**| WotM | PLS | T | C | A 19:44, 14 October 2006 (UTC)**comment**If it had the different title, and the appropriate changes to the content, I'd probably vote for it, or at least retract the against. --monika 19:47, 14 October 2006 (UTC)**Comment**A different title? Like what? "**Your Mom Theorem**"? --**Hotadmin4u69**^{ [TALK] }19:52, 14 October 2006 (UTC)**comment**Yeah, something like that. (And perhaps this should be taken to the discussion page...) --monika 19:56, 14 October 2006 (UTC)- Eh, I don't really want to change the title. The basis of this article is not that it's some abstract, deep mathematical theorem, but just some random sputtering by a madman that at first sounds nonsensical but turns out to be an actual, solvable equation. --
**§****.**| WotM | PLS | T | C | A- And for that, I like it. --
**Hotadmin4u69**^{ [TALK] }20:39, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

- And for that, I like it. --

- Eh, I don't really want to change the title. The basis of this article is not that it's some abstract, deep mathematical theorem, but just some random sputtering by a madman that at first sounds nonsensical but turns out to be an actual, solvable equation. --

## edit From Pee Review

I made this a while ago, and I still like it. *But will the world?* -- **§****.** | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 06:23, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

## edit Wait a minute...

how does (1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)= 6? This was almost an accurate equation, too. It's still a hilarious article, though. --Luigifan14 06:31, 24 August 2008 (UTC)