Talk:The Demented Cartoon Movie

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

I think this article is brilliant. If I get a chance, I'm nominating it for featured. Just so you know. Mrthejazz 21:11, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

  • ...Go ahead whenever you feel like. It's not like it has to pass a rigorous test to be nominated in the first place. --Ж Kalir potentially sexier than you 01:14, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

edit Guess what

i added a few things for zeeky Demented Kill 05:08, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

edit Characters

Okay kids, I think we have plenty of characters at the moment. I suggest we focus more on the plotline with future edits, simple though it is to add bio-blurbs. --Ж Kalir potentially sexier than you 18:45, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

edit I love this article

I give it an A++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --General Insineratehymn 01:39, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

edit From Pee Review

edit The Demented Cartoon Movie

Methinks I've made significant progress on this article by now. How does it look to you? Does it make me look fat? --Ж Kalir potentially sexier than you 16:34, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Humour: 10 I'm truly at a loss for words, as I was when I first saw the cartoon no more than a few months ago. The effort that must've been put into this just baffles me.
Concept: 9 Truly unique and bizarre, but that's sort of what I had anticipated. Don't expect everybody to know what this article it talking about though, which might be the only drawback of pushing to get it featured.
Prose and formatting: 10 Nothing seems to be wrong here.
Images: 10 Serve their purpose and what-not, but my only recommendation would be making them a bit bigger, especially the first one.
Miscellaneous: 10 Nice British overtone with a clever link to Mhaille's userpage on "umbrella-wielding gibberish speaking lunatic on a skateboard".
Final Score: 49 Worthy of the front page, my good friend. Excellent job.
Reviewer: --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 18:05, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Humour: 5 Some of it is funny, but much is just the description of the movie.
Concept: 6 The idea of describing a completely random movie is a bit original, but not overwhelmingly creative
Prose and formatting: 9 It is laid out rather well.
Images: 7 Has only a few pictures, but they are small and intentionaly sloppy. They are however colorful.
Miscellaneous: 8 It definately gets high marks for randomness, but some may not see any humor in it
Final Score: 35 Seems more of an advertisement than an article.
Reviewer: --User:Ghouck/sig 17:21, 5/13/07

Humour: 4 Honestly, it seems like this has everything but good humor in it.
Concept: 7 Although unoriginal, the idea of treating TDCM like one of the literary masterpiece/classics is a novel one.
Prose and formatting: 8 Pretty simple, but a good simple.
Images: 3 Blarg. Three direct screenshots, all clumped together. No thanks.
Miscellaneous: 6 The misleading links were good for a chuckle.
Final Score: 28 Better than most work on Uncyclopedia, but not anything truly amazing.
Reviewer: --Ж Kalir potentially sexier than you 15:37, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

I don't wanna make another table, so I'm just gonna say that it's not as good as the first review and not as bad as the other two. Personally I liked it, but not everyone diggs the random/satire hidden in links humor. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:59, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Personal tools