Talk:The Beatles

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Bloink1 solid
This article was nominated for deletion on April 15th 2011.
The result of the discussion was Keep.

Eh, I fixed the last two song titles that weren't changed, no user ID yet, give me a break. It will be "human" when I make it up. Boogers. Sign me, four tildes: 24.61.192.173 10:41, 28 Oct 2005 (UTC)

This is incredibly unfunny for a subject that has so much potential. I mean come on, A Hard Afternoon's Night?


Agreed. Not funny.

  • Not only not funny, but unreadable. Ugh.
    • agreed, I thinksomeone else and I should do a massive rewrite - they deserve it. -LinkTGF 14:53, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

edit Dewey Cox Quote

“They're almost as good as the Monkees.”
~ Dewey Cox on the Beatles

edit Editing some things

I've just changed the History section. This is about the worst article I've read since Earth, so I'm about to try and clean it up and make it seem a little less... oh, what's the phrase I'm looking for? Written by a four-year-old sufferer of Asperger's. --Xela267 16:33, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

edit Not just unfunny, but unoriginal

Portions of this article as it stands are ripped off from Mark Shipper's Paperback Writer; the mention of Sonny Bono (and the Plastic Bono Band) being the most blatant. 70.173.19.215 06:20, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

edit A bit funny, but mostly stupid

I was expecting a LOT better from this article. I loved the "Everyone Except Paul Is Dead" joke, and a few others, but the rest was atrocious. The Beatles deserve much better, and so do we.

edit Ummm...Okay???

C'mon, man! The Beatles have SO much satirical potential. And when I say satire, I don't mean stupid "McCartney and Lennon were gay" dreck. "Everybody but Paul is dead" was funny and so was "McCutsie" but the rest was shit. The Fab Four deserve better. John could probably write better stuff from BEYOND THE FUCKING GRAVE!!!!!!!

PS: Someme trivia was okay. And why are the Beatles not in the "Better than you" category?

edit Yes, yes...

I agree that this article could be made funnier. Right now I'm trying to work on the pages for the individual Beatles, which are quite horrible. I'd like to see if I can do anything on this one as well. --Mr.Soot Gremlin Soot Gremlin-Talk 00:59, January 14, 2011 (UTC)


edit Please use this... HAHAHA!

JohnLennonYokoOnoArtPorject

Please use this image SOMEWHERE on this page... It is destiny.


With A Little Help From My Friends- Muhammadan style: Oh, I can't hide under shadow of my spear...Mmm I can't fight under shadow of my spear..Oh, I may die under shadow of my spear...

{{User:Anton199/Template:Article}} Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:07, May 29, 2013 (UTC)

edit Comedy Routine

Sadly it is just simply fact that they were a comedy routine. Which makes it not particularly funny as a reference. I dare you to change it to a legislature, or a tribunal. The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.218.2.86 (talk • contribs)

In fact, they were primarily a musical group, and portraying them as a comedy routine is a valid comedy strategy. Portraying them as a legislature would be much less likely to work; but give it a try at The Beatles (legislature) if you like. Spıke ¬ 23:31 10-Dec-14
Personal tools
projects