From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
DerHindemith 03:54, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
By the way, I've proofread a considerable amount of detritus on uncyclopedia, and may I say that not only was this portion of uncyclopedia stunningly well-written, but it was mostly free of grammatical errors. It was as if the writer actually looked over what he had written before posting it. I wait with bated breath the children's section and its flawless grammar and syntax.
- Thanks for looking over the article. I hate to disappoint, but there isn't going to be a children's section. The "under construction" thing was intended as my way of showing that the site was made using sweatshop labour. Also, notice that it's a "children" section, not "childswear". I'm aware that that joke is too subtle for my own good, but I didn't want to actually write that subpage. I might have to expand on the joke. -- 16:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
edit Cake, Is it a lie?
Would it be too fad/même based to insert a foot note noting that the cake is a lie? Hmmm...no article on the game Portal to link to anyway, yet... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 18.104.22.168 (talk • contribs)
- I have no idea what you're talking about, which would make me feel that you should leave it be. As a general rule, it's best to avoid memes. --
11:50, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- WOW. That was like the perfect article, subtle, satirical and proving a point. I could only ever dream of writing one that good in some strange dream where I am not thinking about naked wome- yeah.
Damn, epic sweatshop article. Very well written.
- Thanks. In case you didn't already notice, you can click the links on the right and explore the menswear, ladieswear sections etc. A few people have missed those in the past. -- 17:35, January 5, 2011 (UTC)