Talk:Star Wars

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 05:32, November 2, 2012 by Snippy (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Star Wars article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that.
For a listing of unused images related to this topic, please see the image subpage.

Article policies

Urgh, someone has to fix this AGAIN thanks to Homestarrmanjonson. That's twice he's deleted it in ten minutes. Spiderhax 07:59, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

--I think that there should be a 'head exploding' tag on this page. It's much too long--Unregistered

HAAAHAAAHAAA - some random guy

Good work to the people who wrote this article. Funny shit.

I gave up reading this article after all the terrible quotes. Can no-one think of anything funny?

  • You know that you can edit, right? If you can do better, then by all means, do!--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:54, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

The only thing that could make this better would be to turn it into a 100% serious article on Star Trek. Drive the nerdy fanboys mad! --Bicostp 00:09, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

=Quotes=

Is it just me or is there way too many changes to the quotes? I used to like them when they were out of context, its not funny when theyre bent to allow the context...

edit Complaint

The 'original star wars text' at the bottom of the page is really weird. If that were the original text in the movie, the movie would be rated R. R for really disgusting. Deadhead 23:16, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

I, too, have a complaint. There is too much sexual content. I can't read this without blushing fifty times! and the episode titled "Pleasure Yacht"? what is that? it's not even useful to put on here! Just, tune it down a bit..ok?66.114.0.3 12:54, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Whatever you do, don't read the Star Wars Marital Aids article then.... :) -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)

It's important to note that all the dirty stuff was written by Sir Mhaille. His mum has been told and pocket money stopped Matt lobster 19:36, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

edit Spoiler warning

Nice touch

I don't know if i like the spoiler warning. Its too....true. Azu 15:09, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

edit K.

I'm rewriting this. --Andorin Kato 04:23, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Never mind. Lost it. --Andorin Kato 04:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

edit Rewriting this, I am

Amusing, this page will be, when done I am. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 05:32, Aug 29, 2007

Yeah, I'd say it's about done, rewrite-wise. Yay! P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:33, Sep 27

edit What a ridiculous name!

First I changed "Tatooland" to the much funnier "Yootapootapow," a deviation from the pronunciation of "Utapau", which was the name George named Luke's desert planet until he got inspiration from Tunisia to call it "Tatooine." The name "Yootapootapow" was then changed by me to the even more satirical "Yootapootatootapow." Then I noticed someone changed it to "Yootapootapowpow." The very last one is even funnier than EITHER of mine. Douglas Adams, creator of the name "Slartibartfast", would be proud. Keep up the good work, TheLedBalloon, and other Uncyclopedians! Padawan Animator 04:11, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Padawan Animator

edit Uh... WHAT'S so different?

I have received notifications telling me that anonymous user 217.205.250.130 and The Kaiser rhave edited this article, but after poking around I continuously have no idea what has changed. Especially since the summaries of the edits have been as follows: " - ". Padawan Animator 02:19, 19 October 2007 (UTC)Padawan Animator

What do you mean by "what has changed"? Could you maybe be a bit more specific? If you mean what did they add to the page, you can check by clicking "last" in the history if the page. I'm pretty sure The Kaiser added a completely unrelated template, which I took the liberty of removing, and that IP added something which I remember being just a little overly sarcastic for the tone of the page. Like I said, you can always check the history. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:53, Oct 18
Oh, sweet! I had no idea about that stuff in the history page! Yeah, now I see what's been changed. And I like your editing choices, TheLedBalloon. Padawan Animator 01:01, 19 October 2007 (UTC)Padawan Animator
Good idea on the latest edit, TheLedBalloon. Padawan Animator 02:19, 19 October 2007 (UTC)Padawan Animator
Aww, shucks. You're making me blush. Seriously though, thanks! It's nice to know someone thinks I'm funny. *Sigh,* Someday I'll get that spot on SNL. Someday! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:55, Oct 19

edit Why not just...

...revert back to the featured version? Thy holy article seems to now sucketh. Chocolate Rain 01:56, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Well, here's the diff to the current version... If you wanna revert, go ahead, but it doesn't look too different from what's there now. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:07, Aug 15
I see you have cleansed the page of much crap, until the next barrage... Chocolate Rain 02:09, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, I noticed a paragraph of something that sneaked in somehow... - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:11, Aug 15
Only a paragraph? Chocolate Rain 02:23, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

This article is supposed to be on episode II, not the star wars series as a whole, I expected this to be more like the article about episode I Danpascooch 02:31, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Personal tools
projects