Talk:Romania

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 12:55, May 14, 2012 by Bizzeebeever (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Romania article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that.
For a listing of unused images related to this topic, please see the image subpage.

Article policies

edit FOR FUCK'S SAKE

THIS ARTICLE IS NOT FUNNY ANYMORE

70.179.127.14 20:52, October 4, 2010 (UTC)

edit Hungary is beating you in the awesome article contest

Any good Romanian nationalist should find this inexcusable. (70.179.127.14 02:45, July 5, 2010 (UTC) - I'm not a Romanian nationalist, by the way - I'm an American who thinks nationalism is terribly stupid, lest you not see my sarcasm.)

edit Heroes

Andrei Pintică should be added to the heroes list. 86.125.139.55

edit Bigfoot

Random sighting. Apparentely I should talk? WHY IS SOMETHING ABOUT HUNGARY AT THE END OF THE ARTICLE? i saw him too

edit Loch Ness

The monster was here. There is no Loch Ness Monster. It never survived the visit to Romania. Many hungry gypsies. (and you thought they only eat swans)

edit New currency added

I have added the new currency of Romania with manele stars

Signed -ZaDarkSide


fuck!!!!


ROTFL --Squirrel 13:02, 19 Aug 2005 (UTC)

edit ROMAnai SUXz0rZ!!!!

OMG romania sux I vaneliz3 teh page !!!!!!!!!111@11!!one!! --ih8rom4nia 20:43, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Banned for ONE MILLION HOURS, why don't you go drink some COCA COLA YOU AMERIKKKAN MORAN --Ceausescu 20:47, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

ZOMG, haxxorz --OMFGROMANIAROXX 21:01, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Romania PWNZ you, @ |\/| 3 |2 | ( @ |\| fuXXoR. --Ceausila 00:07, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

STFU, romania is teh gh3y, n00b!!!!11 -ih8rom4nia 20:43, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Romania rulz you fucked mooron! Making fun is one thing but insulting our country is another fuck face!

edit Aggressive Bans

If I see anyone even slightly vandelizeing the Romania article, I will automatically give you a 30 day ban. If you do it again, I will give you a 1 year ban. I have been watching this page go back and forth with vandels. Thus, this article will be heavily patrolled. --Nytrospawn 00:29, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

PS: If you dont like what it says, then please, stop reading the article.


Thank you for doing that. Although...what about the really stupid, unfunny stuff that some write there?

the squirrel --85.186.233.105 13:47, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I delete that stuff myself. Usually, that wouldnt be the case for unfunny stuff. But for this article, I will be very strict. --Nytrospawn 13:51, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I have another proposal for the flag. But I don't know how to post it. It is a 7kb jpeg.

the squirrel --85.186.233.105 13:47, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Use the Upload File link from the toolbox on the left of the page (under the serach box) once you have done that the file you uploaded will presented to you as page with a title Image:Filename.jpeg, simply change the reference to the flag image in the page from [[Image:Transylvanian_flag.JPG|The Romanian flag]] to [[Image:NewFlag.jpg]].
P.S. Get youself a username as well fella. --Elvis 14:57, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Upload it through the Upload File link on the left side of your screen. Then use the link info it gives you to post the picture --Nytrospawn 14:53, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)


thnx. done. Both. If some people don't like they can just put something else instead, right?

--Squirrel 16:02, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Right --Nytrospawn 01:20, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Cool!!! It's one thing to make fun and it's another to be stupid!(I hope i'm not stupid...)

edit Why?

Just because some things are funny doesn`t mean they`re true. Most of all I would like to congradulate you on your passion of making small people feel smaller. We could say the same things about your countries even if we all know they`re not true. If you think this is the best you can do, then why not start making fun of old people and hadicapped people? Anyway I don`t expect anything from a site that`s made it point in making this kind of humour.

Mirabela is cool

edit Satyrical texts should be in the respective area...

That's a' pretty funny satyrical text and I think everyone who has the IQ at least as high as his shoe size can spot that in a few seconds. However, this text should pe placed in the fictional/satyre section and replaced with a decent description of our country. I will try to write an article ASAP and I'm open to any suggestions or corrections on that metter. So please all you non Romanian visitors smile with us. Also, Romanian readers shouldn't take it as personal as Wikipedia is not a classical Encyclopedia where all things are considered tried and true. Consider is as a discussion group, where people share views on certain subjects.

Err I think you maybe confused, this is Uncyclopedia not Wikipedia, the whole site is meant to be funny/satirical/fiction also it should be noted that Romania hasn't been singled out, see Estonia, Mediocre Britain, Scotland, Northern Ireland or for that matter any of the pages in Category:Countries, which your welcome to add blatant lies about (procided they are amusing) --Elvis 11:36, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

edit Pure romanian fun

I had so much fun reading this page. And I am Romanian. I am very curious about the author of this text. A genius. Romanian perhaps?

PS. The map is hilarious.

PPS. I would have a few things to add, but I don't want to ruin the original page: What about Bula, the national hero?

Add it as a new section if you like. Or if it's realy long, mnetoin it somewhere as link then do a new article. --Elvis 16:36, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

the romanian wild squirrel (the only one still alive)

Sharap , romania rulz baby , and is coming hrd!:)

edit Heh

Sharap , romania rulz baby , and is coming hard!:)

edit more fun, I hope

The squirrel is back - the same, the one, the only. I kinda' got the hang of it. How idiotic of me to look for "the author". I would like to congratulate all the contributors, especially the one with the Iliescu smilies and the one with lord sauron a.k.a. Lord of dance. Cool stuff. I hope you will enjoy the bit I added, on the national heroes.

edit romania doesn't mean only bad stuffs

i'm a romanian too, i had lots of fun reading all the stuffs, but i don't think it's such a good ideea to put those on the internet, i had lots of fun because i know my cowntry, but other people don't, what they will think about romania?

Dunno ask the Scots what people will think about scotland or the British about Britain or the Estonians about estonia? --Elvis 10:50, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

They will think about the romanian exactly what they will think about every other country listed here. No one in the right mind will consider this to be true. There isn't any country left un-vandalised. For romanians, I don't think that reading Catavencu means that everything in there is absolute truth. For foreigners, if they take a look at their countries and see how messed up they are, I don't think they'll consider Romania to be as it is written here.

Anyone who considers ANYTHING written here to be "as it is" has got some seriouse problems. --Elvis 11:41, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

now this is the funniest thing i have come across in years :) :)

... and I'm a Romanian too. And (lol) the guy that was offended a few posts before was comparing himself with a handicaped person. :) Gratz to the authors of the article :)

the squirrel sez: First - to those romanians offended by this page: anyway most of the funny stuff on this page is definitely written by compatriotes. No one autside would know this stuff (except the line about the romanian roommates). But if you look around (did you see how many pages there are on the United States?) this page is by far the funniest and by far not the meanest. Honest. Second - to the great many contributors: keep up the good work! the law and law inforcement chapter are a riot, I subscribe. PS There must be a huge Douglas Adams fan writing here. Hitchhicker's Guide to Galaxy rules!

Too many people are taking life too seriously. Can the admins make this page read-only?

Even though there are plenty of vandals, other users are still making legitimate edits to Romania. I think it should remain open to editing for the time being. (I presume you're talking about the main page and not the Talk page...) --Rcmurphy 17:24, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I have to Agree with Rcmurphy, I have at times thought "Fuck it I'm just going to protect it as it's far to much hassle cleaning it up" after someone wanders upon it doesn't "get" the site and blanks it or (worse) inserts "real facts" but I must remeber to resist the urge.--Elvis 22:44, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Ok, but it seems like every other hour somebody blanks it. I think this is the most reverted page ever.

Dunno tough call between this and estonia I don't know if it's something about recently joining or soon to join the EU that causes it, anyone from the recent entrants or accession countries care to comment?--Elvis 08:49, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

We should sent a letter to the Romanian Parliament, to make them distribute tracts among the population saying "Do not become edit warriors : Uncyclopedia is for fun!"... :-) --Bob 10:03, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

edit too bad....

-(

Who has erased the diplomatic relations and law inforcement chapters??!!! that was good stuff, people! it's a pitty. the personal hate messages are funny for just a handful of people, those involved. The more "general" matters are funny for a lot of people. Why do you want to spoil the fun?

the squirrel

I noticed they were gone and recovered them from the history, if there is anything else missing fell free to bring it back from the dead.--Elvis 10:50, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)


Thank you. I tried to look for it but...... the squirell


edit t3h funny!!!111

I just post this to thank all the users who kept the paggy ion a reading order. It is amazingly funny (and some parts would only make sense to a Romanian - like the pula part). Not all Romanians lack a sense of humor. :)

So, thanks Elvis & others for the efforts. Much appreciated.

80.97.82.89 Some dude in Bucharest.

edit ha ha ha ha

esti cel mai mare bou de pe terra!!!!

este super!!!!!!!!!!! felicitari.

edit Don't write if you have nothing to say!!!

Please use correct English for writing, and BE FUNNY, for Ceausescu's sake!

Maybe someone who doesn't have to finish his/her graduation paper by tomorrow, like I do, can correct the stuff... It's our national pride at bay!!!

M0n5t3r 19:24, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

RIGHT! I was just about to post the same thing, lucky I saw yours. I tried to correct some of the new materials last night, but it's hard, I could use some help. A mistype here and there is ok, totally messed up phrases spoil the page. I wish some of the "writers" here would use at least a spelling program. the squirrel --85.186.233.105 13:42, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

edit you are so stupid

very funny har har har.... were do u subscribe for this informations? learn some geogra... do you know what pula means? it mens penis but in a vulgar way so ... sugi pula or suck some dick you fag

very funny har har har... were do u subscribe for your humours?
learn some sense of proportion...
do you know what satire means? it the use of ridicule or scorn, often in a humorous or witty way, to expose vices and follies so ... get a life or fag some dick, you suck

--Elvis 09:22, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

edit i shat myself laughing

Because its all true and so well-written, I envy the talent in the people that wrote this. Also, people defacing this article can get bent.


edit help!

I saw Estonia's page the other day. I'm dead jealous! It's bigger and funnier than Romania's! So: Romanians, to arms!!! (or, better said, to keyboards)

--85.186.233.105 13:52, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

edit help !!

plis excuz may english.

help quik, i'am american girl britney spears.

wheal marry(sexuall favors included) romanian man
for nead imigration visa fast to this byutyful country.

wheel setle whit political azillum.

edit The flag

I love that flag. Nicely mondriaanesque.

--The Hedgehog 10:27, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Just added a new coat of arms too...... --Squirrel 10:39, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Well done. carry on --The Hedgehog 13:35, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Someone please change the flag, right now its the cut out from something that makes me vomit violently --Nytrospawn 18:22, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

edit Different approach proposal

Thank you all for this corner of satire and good humor online. I had a good laugh reading various topics in Uncyclopedia. Thank you for the efforts made to maintain some level of sanity here, with all the edit warriors defacing this page. What I'd like to point out is that the page about Romania is growing into an absurd fictional story with few elements linked to reality. It is somewhat funny, but also has a tendency to piss off some people with negative IQ; no offense. What I'd like to see on this page is humor of higher quality, information resembling reality and making fun of what really defines Romania, not just proof of how wild someone's imagination can be. I have the excellent page on Netherlands as comparison. What do you guys think? Thanks in advance. --Puterfixer 22:07, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC + 2)


Feel free to edit it, provided it's still funny. I think Estonia's page is another good example. And don't forget to vote for it!

--Squirrel 11:21, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I have to agree. Plain bullshit is not funny: the romanian currency is the pula (pula means dick) is just stupid. If I find some time, I'd like to remove all the really stupid stuff, but I'm afraid not much will remain and I'll get banned trying. A hitch hikers guide to the galaxy-style article is what I had in mind. Lio 09:45, 13 Jul 2005 (UTC)

edit Vandals again?

I see now that government part is gone. It is also gone a part I've added a week ago (with Urs Meier). What are these guys trying to prove? That their little brain is larger than their skull?

I can't find a "Government" section per se. Is it under a different name (e.g. "Laws" or "Diplomatic Relations")? --Rcmurphy 00:02, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

No, there was a section with government, it was not under "Laws" (that section was added after my post). It might have been at "People". I've added something there a week ago (with the current romanian president, Basescu). The guy become famous for his campaign against stray dogs (this is not a joke). There's also my line about romanian conflicts in "Diplomatic Relations" which was edited and now it doesn't make any sense. I've checked the history and these 2 IP's were responsible: 81.196.54.101 and 82.76.55.81. The last one blanked Government section. I've restored them, btw. Sorry for so many edits.

i dind not find many references to one of romania`s growing industries: prosttitution adn the export of prostitution to the west. i think it would be realy funny. i`ll try to add this info if i have the time... i`ll try to make it funny

edit vandals or not quite so...

Besides vandalism, there is a lot of bad editing going on on this page (let's call it un-editing). I agree that if a paragraph or picture is not really that funny you should take it out, but in order to replace it with something better. I am rather pissed by the coat of arms thing. I only replaced it with the square chicken (that I made myself, so no copyright problems) because the one that was on the page is ugly and badly made. Does that drawing try to make a point? Because I don't see it. Enlighten me, please. I don't say mine is funnier, or anything, but I took the time to make it look nice, at least.

Second: GUYS! there is enough in this article about manele. There is something about those, in almost every section. Is'n it enough that we hear them all the time in cabs, stores and from neighbours? There are other funny things to write about..... And I agree with Puterfixer somewhat. Funny is funnier when it is somehow developed from some real element. Altough we have quite a history in dadaism.....

PS. WHOEVER CHANGED THE MOTTO AGAIN: THAT IS VERY RUDE, DISGUSTING,STUPID AND NOT AT ALL FUNNY! (it was written by some "Cristti" person, if I figured that out correctly, from history)

--Squirrel 09:54, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)


edit Edit Warrior Psychology 101

It seems that the people defacing the page on Romania behave like kids who get a new trumpet toy. They'll blow on it until they go dizzy just because they can. We can either wait until they get bored and find something else to play with (might take a while) or we can take their toy away and bring an ending to this "who writes dumber things or deletes everything" competition. Perhaps it may be a good idea to freeze the page (or make it uneditable by non-authorized users) for a while, until they forget about it or give up trying. This is the ultimate solution for those who can't understand the concept of a wiki and that the edit button is there to allow improvements, not adding garbage or destroying others' contributions.

Banning them will only encourage them to keep trying because they were noticed. I have seen that some of the banned IPs belong to RDS ISP, and that measure is pretty much useless because RDS is assigning dynamic IPs for its cable Internet customers for a few months. Someone whose IP was banned today may return tomorrow because he has another IP address.

--Puterfixer 14:47, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC + 2)

We have already discused this (Talk:Romania#romania_doesn.27t_mean_only_bad_stuffs) and whilst it's a pain I'm still of the opinion that a lot of the edits are not vandalism, if the only edits made to page where vandalism then I would be the first to protect it but whilst actual content is getting added I think the mood of the meeting is to hold off protecting it (also their blanking useually gets reverted ASAP anyway) which is to a certain extent the nuclear option.
I also take you point re: dynamic IP's and the ineffectiveness of blocking them, it does at least provide something of a speed bump if nothing else. --Elvis 13:33, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

edit Sharing Insider Jokes?

Hey all,

The article is indeed hilarious -- I've read it a couple of days ago and I laughed my ass off. Is there any "hidden" way (think "spoiler" -- a popup, or something) to share the insider jokes with the rest of the world? I mean, the stuff about ciunga is hilarious for a Romanian, but I don't expect the average reader to recognize it as a barbarism for chewing gum. And so on.

--Gutza 20:50, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

edit awesome romanian humor

i don't know who wrote this , but it's obviously a bunch of romanian people who really know the in's and out's of romanian daily life. it's an awesome reading , however, kinda hard for any foreigner to get and there's really no way to clear up the insider jokes...u gotta be romanian to understand them :) congrats to whoever did this . this is so hilarious i laughed for hours and couldn't stop. thank you for the best laugh i had in months

deianejra

edit Coat of arms

Hey guys, the page is awesome ! The funniest country page that I came across by far ! :) So keep up the good work ( I've tried myself to add stuff here and there, but I'm not so tallented). Now, regarding the "Coat of Arms" I also vote for the previous one (the chicken), for reasons already stated above: Maybe none of them has any meaning, but, again, the previous one was simply funnier and also better done ! Nothing against original people, but could somebody replace it ? ;-)


I'm trying to, baby, I'm trying to.......If you see it's gone and want to revive it the image is under the name: Coat-of-arms-Romania2.jpg

--Squirrel 12:17, 28 Jun 2005 (UTC)

edit coat of arms is fine

If youre not romanian you might not get the subtleness of putting the Hungarian flag on the Rromanian coat of arms. It is probably very offensive and funny or both.


Point taken. Better now?

--Squirrel 12:15, 28 Jun 2005 (UTC)

yeah sure

edit Coat of arms part two

If you aren't romanian, probably 50-70% of the article would seem gibberish anyway (or pure nonsense at best), so I think that's not a very realistic argument. The actual coat of arms is just lowsy (at least technically speaking).

I see now ( 10:52 am RO time) that the page undergoes quite heavy modifications without so much new input. Is that really necessary ? Shouldn't this be a reason for ban as well ?! Well, just a thought...

Maybe at some point the page should remain stable having some standard format (as most of the pages dedicated to other countries do). If further inovative ideas come along, there would be plenty of ways to make links to new pages, without deleting whole sections or turn them upside down.

Speaking about readability and amount of fun, maybe it would be the time to point out that not so many folks are crazy fans of Tolkien or "Heroes of Might and Magic" PC game or whatever crap. To give an example, the "suckiest country" and "asshole of europe" seem (to me) funnier than all that endless orcs/warlords/vampires/Vlad Dracu thing (same as "manele"). A little "anchoring" in reality doesn't harm, even if some would feel it offending. Sensible patriot fellas should bear in mind that Romania might not be accepted in EU at all (not even as "the official asshole") as it seems more and more obvious now, if they really want to have something to cry about or feel offended (and yeah, that's damn real, not just a wiki page)...

edit Changing the page IS vandalizing

Romania was once nominated for appearance on the first page. Now?? Whoever thought that modifying the page was a good idea is terribly wrong. If any admins read this, please revert to the last page (just Romania) and remove the "What I didn't know about Romania series" link. The information should all be in one place.

Compiled the articles into Romania. Hopefully I have covered every aspect. Bring something new.

Absolutely 100% disagree:
  1. Just because a page is highlighted dosn't mean that it can't improve.
  2. The What I didn't know about Romania series was a mergeing of a load of stubby articles that on their own were about to be huffed.
  3. Placing ALL the details from the WIDKAR series in the main article would have made it over long
  4. As it is having one main article then a lot more articles going into more detail is the same style as wikipedia (and thus a better parody).
--Elvis 09:23, 29 Jun 2005 (UTC)


As I see in the list of articles proposed for deletion, the only articles related to Romania are those posted in the "What I didn't know about Romania" series, not the ones copied from the original "Romania" article. Go see.

Actualy all of the ariticals listed there went into the WIDKAR, not the other way round.
P.S. On talk pages, Uncyclopedia:Community Portal, VFD and the like it's a good idea to sign your contributions (use --~~~~ 2 dashes and 4 tildes or the second from right button above the edit window (looks sorta like a signture).--Elvis 10:04, 29 Jun 2005 (UTC)

"Actualy all of the ariticals listed there went into the WIDKAR, not the other way round" and "Placing ALL the details from the WIDKAR series in the main article would have made it over long"..Did you think to clean (delete) the bad articles before creating the WIDKAR series? If you have done that, maybe the main article wouldn't have been that long. The problem is that good articles were mixed with thrash ones.--Acidoo 07:12, 30 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Acidoo, stop editing my article changing from dogs to maddoggs.Is annoying. Add your own line. --Redrake 05:30, 2 Jul 2005 (UTC)

edit Where this article is going to...

"As it is having one main article then a lot more articles going into more detail is the same style as wikipedia (and thus a better parody). --Elvis 09:23, 29 Jun 2005 (UTC)"

Right, right... but still I have to disagree with you 60%. I support the idea of having a "tree structure" with sub-structures, links, and so on... after all I just said that (yesterday). But this is not just about improving something, it's about highlighting something that was written two hours ago in detriment of what was known as "THE ARTICLE", of what pushed the article on the main page.

In other words, who can judge if "Tourism" and "Sport" is better/funnier than - let's say - diplomatic relations or law system ?

--195.37.184.165 12:17, 29 Jun 2005 (UTC) Me

Go to the "People of romania" section and read about Lucian Madean or Gainusa (just read Estonia..damn funny..did romanians write that page?? it's worth checking out)..--Acidoo 07:28, 30 Jun 2005 (UTC)

...and your point is ?

edit coat of arms

i like the coat of arms but why is the tuica brown and not colourless? has someone not distilled it properly from shit and it still has some remains of the main ingredient?


Yup, it's 'pufoaica' tuica, and it's been prepared in a hurry (like most romanian things), in accordance with the national motto Las-o ba ca merge asa!

edit this site is famous

NEWSFLASH - this site has become so famous that there are 2 articles about it in the serious and not so serious written press: one in Catavencu, one in Business Magazin (6-12 July). Hip, hip-hurray! (PS the one in BM is much better) --Squirrel 16:30, 11 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Have you got any links to these, looks like we may have to create a {{fooled the world|HTTP://www.foolishnewssite.com/story about uncyclopedia}} template for pages that get mentoined on real sites.--Elvis 12:33, 13 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Unfortunately it is not possible. The first, in "Catavencu", is not free online, unless it's 6 month old or so, which is not the case, yet; the second, in Business magazin, is not availible online because the magazine is not online yet (aaargh!).

--Squirrel 13:34, 14 Jul 2005 (UTC)

I could try and scan the article in Catavencu and post it or send it to one of the admins..What do you think?? --Acidoo 11:33, 25 Jul 2005 (UTC)

...and I hear there is a new one in "Aspirina saracului". Boy, is this site famous or what!!!? PS scanning and posting it I think a a think to be done only with their approval, ar there can be some copyright problems involved. I can try and talk to some people... I'll get back to you on this issue--Squirrel 16:59, 25 Jul 2005 (UTC)

edit what do you think of my 1989 revolution section?

I tried to make it seem like part of the article.. sort of... also waht do you think of the image?

personally i think it should replace the current flag, although i want to ask your opinions first ok


Not bad. Although well done, the new flag is a little too "graphically explicit" in my opinion. But hey, that's just my opinion. --Squirrel 10:45, 25 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Thanks man, but i went through metaphorical hell cutting the arm off the famous picture i got it off. I tried to use both arms but then the hole couldn't go in the centre really. I'll see if i can write more since if theres anything this article needs, its more crap written by me. Also, many bad photoshops.

........I don't think you get what I mean. the photoshop handicraft is not bad, although it could do with a little more work around the hole. My problem is that it looks too muck like someone is trying to pry open his own butt. I don't know if that was what you intended. And about the writing: Step 1 - get a username; Step 2 write, but please, if you do so, write correctly (sometimes a spell check is not enough;) Step 3 - if it's not funny enough, the stuff you add will be "edited mercilessly".

--Squirrel 17:09, 25 Jul 2005 (UTC)

edit This site is famous - Part 2

A new article on this fabulous page/site has come to my attention. This time it is accesible online (for romanians only, I'm affraid). Check it out at: http://www.hotnews.ro/articol_27498-Romania-lasata-la-voia-internautilor.htm

PS/Disclaimer I hope this stuff is legal, I mean Hotnews is a free website, but the article was published originally in "Evenimentul Zilei". But if they made it accesible it is their problem, right?

--Squirrel 10:45, 25 Jul 2005 (UTC)

In a wise manner I previously saved the Romanian "Birdy" Coat of arms... I'll send it to someone if he wants to...


Sign your posts please. I don't know what you mean by "birdy". They were al birds. Although the one that's on now (with the pufoaica tzuica spilling from a bottle) is definitely the best (congrats to the author, by the way). --Squirrel 11:35, 1 Aug 2005 (UTC)

edit Bucharest needs help

Someone inserted a line on Bucharest on the Geography page. I took the liberty of erasing the not so funny stuff there, but it made me realise that's a domain not to be missed. There would be soooo much to say about it, what I put there is just a start (and not a very funny one, I'm affraid). Please edit it funnyly, I feel I'm not up to the task. --Squirrel 11:40, 1 Aug 2005 (UTC)

edit Other

Hey.. where did that nice flag and cout of arms go? Don't say you actually removed it because of some stupid ppl without sense of humour..

Some idjit deleted it. I restored everything that I noticed was missing. --Rcmurphy 20:18, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)

But yesterday there was a cartoon like coat of arms, and a gayflag-like romanian flag too.

I'm afraid I can't find anything different from the coat of arms and flag that are up now, at least in the page's recent history. What's wrong with what's in the article now, anyway? --Rcmurphy 16:27, 9 Jul 2005 (UTC)


the newest richest man in the world is a romanian guy. he is even richer than bill gates, having a fortune of 100 billions uros. he's guy who owns several business in the media, oil, transportation, manufacture and trade. he's 26 years old and rght now he's the most wanted guy in the entire world by all the women. he is know by the excentrices. he drives and owns 100 rare vehciles and he is know as The Shark. anybody who wants to proose good businesses can right him...he's very opened to bright ideas.....

Errr So your point is?--Elvis 15:58, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Btw.. Are you even romanian!?--Zombie 09:45, 15 Jul 2005 (UTC)


Romania rulz? Really? Wow. If that's true, you should go and update wikipedia. They're really into facts like that. --Goomball 08:38, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)


Fuck off all of you...romania is very nice....

edit BRAVA!

bravooo !!! :D

the dude who make thiz is a geniues ! :D

if there's somebody who dosnt understand what uncyclopedia iz then .. its stupid the texts are really great! hail to gigi ! :D

ps : parazitii rulz

edit Coat of arms / flag

Please keep all the images that represent the Flag or the coat of arms (people miss the drunken bird)

The drunken bird image is here: image:Romania new coatofarms.jpg. I don't know why it was changed, but feel free to add it somewhere else in the article. --Rcmurphy KUN 16:19, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)

edit Quite embarrassing

I am a new user and I have subscribed to Uncyclopedia because I wanted to find out more about the article on Romania. I'm a Romanian and I must say I wasn't too happy when I read it. The are some very good jokes, other very good jokes which only Romanians can laugh at (such as the banknotes with manele singers on them - that's an excellent joke but it would fit much better e.g. on a Romanian-language Uncyclopedia), and then there's many many dirty words which are very embarrassing. I am sure I can contribute in a civilized way to making the article better. --Portoseb 19:29, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

edit I tried to post some history stuff

I loved the article so I tried to make the history section larger and I also added a couple of remarks here and there. However my English spelling is very bad so if somebody could correct it it would be really nice. I would also like to know if it's funny or I should quit it. ohh and I am new to any wiki so I don't know how to edit and what I added looks like one big block of text..sorry... Darcken 01:16, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC)

edit Fooh-tootzi moortzee mah-tea to the author... cunoscatorii stiu de ce ;)

NO MORE COMMENTS...

edit Where's the fun?

The history section is more serious than Wikipedia. Are there any of those wikipedian sick creatures, trying to make fun of the reader in a subtle way???

Really think that way? I think the history part is really funny(then again I wrote some of it) Be more precise what you don't like. And sign!!!Darcken 09:25, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

see [1]....that was the boring version, long gone now--Luci S 13:14, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

ai ai ai ai; Now that's a real history courseDarcken 05:33, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

edit Wondering about all the idiots

Every time I check out a Romania related article it's bound to be vandalized by some idiot who posts something like "this is not funny we are a country too...blah blah blah". WHAT the hell? Are other country pages sooooo vandalized as Romanian ones or are we, romanians just stupid and don't get it? Maybe somebody should make a tag with "Joke you moron!" and put it on Romanian pages. Or something for Ceausescu's sakeDarcken 06:50, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I think Romania is easily the most vandalized page on the site, but that's probably because it apparently got some media attention, not because Romanians are just stupid. (Although they might be. I don't know, I'm just an ignorant American.) --—rc (t) 06:54, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)

edit ho! ho! ho!

i really don`t get this,u stupid people! don`t u have sense of humour? don`t cha? not even a little bit? i know.... the only thing u posses is a negative IQ congradulations!:)

this page is by far the best page i have ever seen. yes,i am an Roumanian! yes,i have so-called "discernamant"!

it`s just a funny page, for funny people

if u don`t like it,just get the hell outta here

congradulations to the authors ! u rock guys!

Dee

edit image

pic81.jpg

edit Romanian profanity

Please add a link on this page to Romanian profanity - it contains adult language but it's funny...


edit Just passing by =

... and noticed this scandalous factual error? Why is Romania clasiffied under the Magyar-what's-that-gibberish-name? I notice this strange "M-word" is a direct consecuence of the Template:Hunagry category tag. Someone should completeley erase it. The tag, that is, not Hungary. Please leave Hungry people where they are.14:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC)86.55.204.215 me 14:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC)86.55.204.215

edit The Capital

Is not "Faurei". It is "Baicoi" and its sub-capital, Plescoi, where delicious sausages are being made. --Easter cow 22:10, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

why is something about hungary at the end of this article?

edit Bozgorian flags spotted

Why putting the hungarian stuff in the bottom of this page ?! That's just racist !
Transylvania is Romanian ! Deal with it. --Zeraw08 02:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Nationalist fucknuttery will not be tolerated. Fuck off.

edit Aromanians

Could you please put a link to the article about Aromanians ? --Hovereel 16:13, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

edit unblock topic

please unblock this topic, it's kinda out of date

Xallax 01:41, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

== Big foot! == 3/10/09 Random Big Foot Sighting

In accordance with International Random Big Foot Sightings in Uncyclopedia Articles Day, Big Foot has been randomly sighted in this Uncyclopedia article. Please report this on this page's Talk page. Thanks for the reporting.

Prepare for alcoholic rehab.

edit Article is not funny

Article is not funny, just dumb. Please make it funny. 70.179.127.14 19:05, November 19, 2009 (UTC)

+1 99.232.175.246 21:14, January 7, 2010 (UTC)
And what's with the map? no one's even trying to be funny anymore... 99.232.175.246 21:16, January 7, 2010 (UTC)

edit Romanian Culture: Abortion and Immigration

I can't belive you left out the OBVIOUS :)..you really should check your sources we're like #1 for Abortions in the whole world and in the top 10 for immigrating out of that fucking shithole :)..Please update ASAP.

edit Diacritic marks

Can anybody in charge of editing this page add Romanian diacritics to the "Dragostea din tei" lyrics? Thanks... Or could you possibly comment on Romanians' usual habit of omitting them?

edit Budapest vs Bucharest

I think the summer capital could be rendered as [[Budapest|Bucharest]] 82.78.140.17 19:55, May 20, 2011 (UTC)

edit Racism allowed?

I don't know much about this wiki, but I'm assuming racism is allowed, coz all the rrom bit is part of a Romania's great tradition of discriminating against their gipsy minority. Change the word "rom" for "black people" in a US article, how long would it last?

--82.58.99.43 07:59, July 21, 2011 (UTC)

edit Content index sucks

Per manual of style could you place the content index in the right position? The right position for the manual of style of ALL wikis. --95.233.87.21 18:32, May 13, 2012 (UTC)

This page is also marked as a featured article. --95.233.87.21 18:32, May 13, 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, it was featured a loooooooooooooong time ago. Its quality has steadily declined since then, as multitudes of IPs have taken shits on it. I may either revert all the changes since it was featured, or else turn it over to some folks for Imperial Colonisation. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-usMon, May 14 '12 12:55 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects