Talk:Rock, Paper, Airstrike

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

edit From Pee Review

I wanna see if this is good enough for VFH. Be brutal if you must, but be warned that I'll probably think it's perfect as-is.  ;)--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 04:28, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

With pinky, thumb and index finger extended it could be Rock, Paper, Satan! Do I have to be an administrator to mark up the pee table?? I feel hesitant to review another admin's article out of fear of dying. --AmericanBastard 04:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Anyone can use the template. You're encouraged to sign up as part of the reviewing committee, but yeah, anyone can use the table.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 04:44, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Also, I'm the admin that bites people the least often, or so I've been told.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 04:45, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Semi-related: any beefs with the image can be taken up here. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 01:32, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Humour: 8 The switch from playfulness to melodrama in the conclusion is effective. I also like how you ridiculed the concept of paper beating rock.
Concept: 8 The concept is good. It's a war game. Can you work in "War," the card game?
Prose and formatting: 7 The sections could use some development. I'd suggest extending the incongruity into a History section, but I don't know how that would flow.
Images: 10 The image is fine.
Miscellaneous: 7 My guess on VFH is a high QFH.
Final Score: 40
Reviewer: Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 19:17, 3 January 2007 (UTC)


Humour: 8 Short, but pleasant. This piece only has one joke and deploys it well.
Concept: 8 [This space intentionally left blank]
Prose and formatting: 5 Yeah, I guess I wonder if you could do how other things would work here. Like maybe the origin of the game (devised to fill the shocking lack of airstrikes in rock, paper, scissors) or common derevations (rock, paper, 35 megaton nuclear ICBM and airstrike, airstrike, airstrike) damous matches in history. Things of my nature. Also - please get rid of the word (wimps) at the end of the paragraph. It doesn't read encyclopedia-ey.
Images: 4 Meh. I could try to whip up the three gestures in Illustrator, if you like.
Miscellaneous: 6 The idea of children rolling around and giggling upon mutual airstrikes made me smile. That's adorable.
Final Score: 31
Reviewer: - Lemon. Lemonwedge 20:09, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! <<Bradmonogram.png>>


edit Rock/Paper

Maybe you should do if Rock against Paper, then both players score as indicated and then play again with the Rock/Paper + score increased by +1 (the paper loser loses still the same amount), until it isn't Rock against Paper anymore. Maybe it makes the game more confusing, if so, then good! You are confused? Good. --zzo38 04:51, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

edit A note to the person who made a link with the note "a link to an earlier article"

Um, this article had two peer reviews over a year before that other link. (Sorry, I'm just an anal-retentive writer who thinks way too much of himself and HATES to be accused of being unoriginal.)--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 01:48, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Personal tools
projects