Talk:Red link

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 00:45, August 26, 2011 by Jishanpeter (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

So, how are we all feeling about red links today? Personally, I think there can and should be more here (at Uncyc in general) than at Wikipedia, because in theory, anything at all could have an article about it. But that's just me. --Lenoxus 17:13, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Zoopy. Zoopie. Zoopies. Zoop. Zooping. Zoops. Zoopings. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 17:15, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
I'll link 'em up when I find the time. ;) --Lenoxus 18:22, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

edit About The World's biggest (confirmed) Red Link

Er... This isn't link, is it? So, This article theme is Red link, I think false that there is black and [[ ... ]] is written. well... Do we should fix up? Wasaby 11:41, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

edit Sabotage

I take full responsibility lolz. I hope you will see the funny side.This article has just been ruined edited by an idiot a genius.12:47, 07 1 12:47, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
P.S. Don't bother trying it on me, all my articles are fully backed up by some random idiot superadvanced computers.

edit And it's here to stay.

Don't try and delete it again, idiots. This article has just been ruined edited by an idiot a genius.14:35, 07 28 14:35, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

edit Wikipedia does have this!

Jishanpeter 04:18, July 27, 2011 (UTC)

Personal tools
projects