Talk:Qu'ran

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

khan!!!!!!!!!!!The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.104.105.221 (talk • contribs)

kirk!!!!!!!!!!!!!

edit I'm AMAZED

freakin people. dont u have any other better things to do?

That there's no rantin' and ravin' on this talk page about this article from a bunch of zealot towel-heads. Come on now.. some idiot camel jockey should at least pop on and tell us how western women are all whores 'cause they don't dress in full length curtains and bedsheets.

The true history of how the Koran was written is found in the new Amazon.com's satire entitled "How Fatima Started Islam: Mohammad's Daughter Tells It All". It explains that the drunken Mohammad babbled all the time and his intelligent daughter literary puts words into his mouth for her own purposes. Mohammad, after all, was nothing but a stupid, alcoholic pimp too stupid to run a fig and coconut stand never mind a religion or army.

Islam = a third-rate religion perfect for the third world!

i never knew that the quran was a curry dish?

Me too, Although I have to admit, i'm almost euphoric that the all-devouring disease known as "political correctness" has yet to discover this page as it has clearly found the other

Ill have you know, I am a world class camel jockey. Ive placed first in the Dakar Herding Rally. But seriously though, try to keep the haterade to yourself--Nytrospawn 04:59, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

By the by, I will be placing this on NRV, because it seems less funny and more antagonistic. I dont if inciting people is funny. I actually do know, it really isnt funny. --Nytrospawn 05:02, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Looks like the Quotes section should be cleaned out. I'll check it out. --Allahgator 05:43, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Took out the quotes now which belong on a debating website, not here. --Allahgator 04:36, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

This article is crap, it's clearly just antagonistic. I'm not sure a genuinely funny article on the koran could be done, or whether it would be worthwhile, but if it was done, it would be pretty useful if the author had actually read the koran at all and hence could properly imitate its style/tone/origins, rather than just deflecting extremist Western views of extremist Islamist stereotypes. I think it should be put up for deletion unless someone can come up with other, better ideas. --El Sid 15:36, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

So... Edit Uncyclopedia! MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 15:45, Jul 4

I'm not experienced/talented enough to do it, I was just hoping to flag this article's shortcomings for someone more talented. I think whoever does it should know more about the topic and I think a satire of it would naturally be funnier if it were more subtle (the current first line, "sequel to the bible", for example, is quite funny), and preferably written by a secular muslim (touchy area obviously, but there are muslims that could approach it in a manner that would be both more sensitive and more accurately critical of radical muslims) or someone who is critical of the nature of Judeo-Christian religions or revealed religion in general. If noone wants to do it, then I reckon it should just be deleted. --El Sid 16:32, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

k so I cleaned it, got rid of the blatant hate and left the funnier parts, I seriously think a funny article can be made of this, it just needs to be approached in the right way. --El Sid 17:34, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Uncyclopedia. ;-) MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 19:12, Jul 4

Cheers MrN, thanks for making feel welcome :) --El Sid 20:44, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

edit Don't make fun of religious books

Weather that be the Bible OR the Qu'ran . Just my 2 cents. :) The preceding unsigned comment was added by 94.59.198.59 (talk • contribs)

Better yet: Don't let someone who can neither sign, register, or spell tell you what you can and can't make fun of. Spıke ¬ 16:54 20-Feb-14
Personal tools
projects