Talk:Papercuts of Doom

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Papercuts of Doom

  • This is a stunning piece of literature! I wept, I cried, I still cannot believe that the author manages to pack such an emotionally visceral wallop, all within the space of a single two-letter word! If this great opus of humanity's struggle against sharp papery edges is ever deleted, or even modified, I may break down in tears, and never live life the same way again! This, then, is a KEEPER!!! --DW III CUNOUN 02:43, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I was worried for a second that this would overshadow Fisher Price, but to be frank, I'm ok with that now. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 03:34, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
  • KEEP! Always up for a good, new injoke. This should be on VFH, not VFD!!! (Somewhat joking...) -- Sir Cornbread The Great Icons-flag-us [SHOUT] [MUN] [GET THIS FEATURED!] 03:44, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
One thing at a time; gotta get it past VFD first. --DW III CUNOUN 04:21, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
At any rate, I'm not inferring that it's VFH material (perhaps not nearly meaty enough for some tastes). However, the writer IMO deserves some sort of major award for this bold, yet humbly succinct, submission. --DW III CUNOUN 20:23, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
  • DWIII, you are not, nor have you ever been, User:Rcmurphy. All that aside, though, keep just because it has the word "doom" in the title. —Sir Major Hinoa [TALK] [KUN] 05:33, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Undelete. Codeine isn't him either. Undo his decision. --Sbluen 23:59, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - we need this, dattebayo MD H.LajosROAR 22:28, Wednesday October 18 2017
  • Giggle. I am Justice! aka: Halsoft.
  • Why did DWIII nominate a page for "votes for deletion", then put his Herbie Hancock under "keep"? Modusoperandi 02:51, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For the same reason the swallow always flies north under the half-full moon. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 03:34, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Thanks for clearing that up. Disregard my foolish question. Modusoperandi 05:42, 22 July 2006 (UTC)


This is good, but it's no Penisgina --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 21:57, 19 August 2007 (UTC)


Well, hey, it's an important part of uncyc, plus everyone needs to know about the papercuts of doom... to you know... be safe..... and knowledgable...... and stuff........ so yeah, keep this article. It's also easy to read, since it's only two letters, and if you're too lazy to read an entire article like me, you should go to fabuluous articles like this one! Yep.--Spartaaa!!! 21:40, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

SeeTalk template

{{editprotected}} Doesn't it hurt the humor a little to have {{SeeTalk}} at the bottom? Presumably, if the papercut killed the author, wouldn't "Ow." be the end of the article? I propose putting {{SeeTalk}} at the top instead. Pentium5dot1 05:11, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Correction: Since the article is fully protected, couldn't we just remove {{SeeTalk}}, since no one will try to edit it anyway? If this is not a good argument (due to rogue admins, perhaps), then let my original request above stand. Pentium5dot1 05:15, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Correction again: Oops, it's not a real SeeTalk template, as it also says "or deleting." I am withdrawing all of the above requests. Pentium5dot1 05:18, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Personal tools