Talk:Minecraft

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Wow. If Minecraft had a bad side... I would normally come up with a comeback to this rubbish, but I cannot because: 1. although it makes Minecraft sound boring... A lot of it is true. Yes, a lot of time is spent mining. And building. And crafting. I guess what makes Minecraft exciting is the fighting of monsters. 2. It's Uncyclopedia. It's supposed to be 100% rubbish.

4. A lot of this is not true about Minecraft, much more than is true.

5. There is no 3 or 5

6. I like the game for it's graphics. In 16-bit awesomeness, it can be hard to make bloody games. I like clean games. The preceding unsigned comment was added by 170.215.91.225 (talk • contribs)

edit French Wiki

Hi, can you add ---> [[fr:Minecraft]] at the end of the article. Thanks. 78.155.15.36 16:38, November 13, 2012 (UTC)

Done. --Snippy 21:07, November 13, 2012 (UTC)

Someone needs to fix this rubbish up.The preceding unsigned comment was added by Appleapple1234 (talk • contribs)

edit Going a bit more in depth.

I was thinking about going a bit more in depth in terms of the information on this page, such as adding a section for mobs, the other game modes (hardcore, etc.), and online servers, what do you all think? Written by Thetruemariozplaze (Talk to me) 00:39, April 8, 2015 (UTC)

In-depth articles are fine as long as they don't bore people (i.e. keep up the funny all the way to the end). Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 08:59, April 8, 2015 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects