Talk:Main Page

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 18:34, July 29, 2007 by Prinzeugenisback (talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

This is the place for discussing the Main Page itself. For your inconvenience, we've provided a table of useful pages, but don't discuss them here.
New Stuff on top. Make a separate header for each topic.

For general Uncyclopedia chat, please use the Village Dump.

Archived talk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Help Menu

Uncyclopedia is a content-free encyclopedia. Anyone can edit Uncyclopedia, and its contents are free and open to abuse.

You can also help poor people by giving them money.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

The Big Five

Quick help links

Resolving disputes
To resolve issues between users.
Report a site problem
Report issues with the software and the site.
Ask an administrator
New contributors are encouraged to ask for help.
Multilingual coordination
Coordinating the languages.
Community Portal
This is a good place to start.
Totally irrelevant announcements and news.
If you need help with your own Wiki.
Citing Uncyclopedia
For help citing Uncyclopedia as a reference.

Ask a question

Newbie Help
List of users happy to help newcomers.
Village Dump
For answers (sometimes) and a closer look at how the site is run.
IRC chat channels
Whining and throwing feces.
Add this magic incantation to your page and help will soon appear.

Things to do

What you can do
An entire list of options.
Requested articles
Write an article requested by users like you, or request an article yourself.

Policies and Such

Other Important Links

General information pages

Special pages

Oscar Wilde featured

And on the same day UnNews shows Bush's colon. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us

Truly a landmark day in Uncyc's history. -RAHB 06:33, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

I Return...

...and prolly nobody cares. After quite a long absence I look forward to once again contributing to Uncyclopedia. It looks to me like the Mexican article could use some major work... I will look into that. If any repetetive tasks need to be done I would be happy to go about that. (I pwnt those Canned quotes back in the day.) -- neoEva88 MUN F@H PS CM NS (

OK Lame Page

The home page is an eye sore anyone please change it before my eyes bleed. Vogon poetry not withstanding it is UGLY! --CptCarnage 12:27 PM EST , 25 May 2007


I think its kinda funny yet weird and cool all mixed into one Cosmic Drink

The Vogon front page was fun...for a day :) --PoorNUnknown 11:52, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

What in the world...?

Im all for The Hitchhikers guide and all, but, whats up with the Hitchhikers themed main page? --The-elementalist 07:09, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

And what's up with linking to a wikipedia article! This is a serious encyclopedia, people. Aaadddaaammm 09:39, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Category Craziness

Has anyone else noticed that sometimes, you move your cursor over a category, yet, when you click, you click on one a short bit on the right of that one? User:Uncyclopedian/sig 03:34, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

UUI (Uncyclopedia under the influence) is never what you expect it to be. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:37, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

I dare you to ban Me

Hehehehe SockpuppetservedwithasideofriceandgreenpeppersisatraditionalfoodforprinzEugen 02:39, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

We're getting there. In the meantime, perhaps you would like to vandalise my userpage? Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:58, 13 May 2007 (UTC)


Today's page sucks. That is all. --Ekashp 04:37, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your constructive criticism. Is there a particular aspect of it that "sucks," in particular?--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 13:35, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Sure - just about all of it. The idea, while good, is better placed on Fox News, or perhaps UnNews than the main page. While I see where the idea was going, I believe it flopped. The sudden change in site design, while comical in certain circumstances, annoys me more than provides for humor. Perhaps its just my natural disdain for anything related to the idiots at Fox, CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, BBC, and every other "mass news media" station, but this Main page does not work for me. Keep in mind that not only am I just one user, but there are a lot of viewers who are not registered / could not be bothered to find the Talk page. --Ekashp 20:25, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Woah, actually well-thought-out criticism. Thank you (this time, no sarcasm).--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 20:28, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
I was tired when I posted the first time, as I'd just gotten off of 12 hours of work(ugh) and was denied a portion of my daily dose of laughs. It seemed like the sucking was obvious at the time... :-/ --Ekashp 20:31, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

I cannot find the links to Special:Mypage, Special:Recentchanges, or Special:Search on the Main page. --Starnestommy (TalkContribsFFSWP) 18:30, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

If you click the link that says, "Main" on today's page, it will take you to a version of the main page that has all of those things.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 19:57, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
I think you mean "home". --Starnestommy (TalkContribsFFSWP) 19:58, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

I liked it. The fact that unregistered users wouldn't know what the site is about would be the only reason I would criticize a reskin. I hate FOX news too, but the idea was making fun of FOX news. --RAHB 20:20, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

April Fool's Day

I was somewhat disappointed that, as a joke, there was no redirect from this main page to the Wikipedia main page... It would've been funny... 21:26, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Maybe next year, the entire page should just redirect to wikipedia, and everybody's like WTF for the day, half of them not realizing it's April Fool's Day. That would be kind of funny, and is probably what you just said but I was too stupid to realize. -- RAHB 04:25, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Big shrooms

Anybody else see the shrooms in the exciting notice as giant pixelated images? It is kind of funny, but a little annoying -- RAHB 16:26, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

I'll bet you'll think this is madness. Well, guess what? THIS IS SPARTAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! or in the words of the guy who was at the other end of that quote, "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!!!!!!!!!!" *falls into abyss* --RAHB 18:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
The abyss falls into you! Shouldn't they be removed for the april fool's article?-- 02:28, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
It looks as though they have been -RAHB 17:14, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
It should be, "THIS IS JENNNNNGGGGAAAAAAAAAAA!" Megamanfanx7 14:02, 5 April 2007 (UTC)


hi Theworldsmostamazingsockpuppetknownforhisheroicactsofkindnessisnowabiomovieyeildedasthebestsockpuppetever 17:07, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

No need to upgrade

Why does the Uncyclopedia need to close FOR TWO DAYS? The server is fine, and it won't be fare if people won't even be able to view the Uncyclopedia. What the hell? Cheddar Cheesia 19:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

It's a MediaWiki upgrade, not a server upgrade. Apparently we'll be getting New Featurestm. —rc (t) 19:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, but two days with no Uncyclopedia? That's too long. Also, how could we get new features? It'll still look the same, like always. Cheddar Cheesia 20:30, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

It's only three hours each day, I think. Here's the Wikia announcement. —rc (t) 20:41, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Do what I do, vandilize wikipediaPrinz Eugen 17:55, 20 March 2007 (UTC)Prinz Eugen

It was worth it, you should see the admins on IRC...I've never seen such cheery smiles on their little faces. It's like their birthdays and Christmas all came at once, bless 'em :) RabbiTechno 17:57, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
^_______________________________^Major Sir Hinoa prepare for troublemake it double? 18:01, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
:D I don't think anyone will be getting banned for a whi... Wait what's that? someone vandalising? *gets banstick* —Braydie 18:05, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Heh heh. Nevermind. I slept through the downtime. xD Cheddar Cheesia 19:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

The edit buttons have changed!

And I really don't like the change. I think it should be changed back to the old one.

Disregard that. I actually LIKE the new edit buttons! But could the edit buttons be moved to the END of a title instead of the BEGINNING???????? Just a thought. Trar (talk|contribs|grueslayer) Mchammer

Should be fixed sometime. —Braydie 22:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
I like the ones that have been restored. In my opinion, the last new ones were oversized, and just didn't make pages look right. The original ones are just fine. Cheddar Cheesia 19:20, 21 March 2007 (UTC)


i think some one should reskin the front page on april 1st for april fools day just a suggestion from a random n00b Ninja star 01:03, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, remember last year when Uncyclopedia was bought out by Apple and became iHumor? I see the real news, but why is there no re-skin this year? -- 03:13, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm no fool

Did anyone notice april 1st "did you knows" being actial fact instead of nomal misfacts . Well this sort of bugs usually happens at this year .

Facts ?! In my Uncyclopedia ?! NO WAI!! 08:14, 1 April 2007 (UTC)


Why wasn't Fisher Price featured instead of a spork from Wikipedia? --Emmzee 12:37, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Oh noes! it's turned into Wikipedia! You killed Kenny! You Bastard!



good work, dudes 19:17, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

What's up with the Finnish wiki?

Not sure if this is the right place to ask, but how come the "fi" interwiki link from the English uncyclopedia still links to the abandoned Finnish Hikipedia? For comparison: old Hikipedia, new Hikipedia. Some other uncyclopedia versions also still link to the old version... Portuguese links to the new one. Esn 13:26, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia sucks

Seriously, get a life

My feelings are so hurt. You've shattered all that is meaning in my life. I might as well go die, knowing of your ruthless disapproval of our activities here, and having realized that my life has been one big waste. --RAHB 16:01, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

I am sorry for thatPage Vandal 20:16, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

It's quite alright, the cuts are starting to heal and my bloodflow is back to a normal rate -RAHB 22:27, 25 June 2007 (UTC)


Should there be a disambig link at the top to Unicyclopedia?

No, it should be the other way around. Wikipedia needs a disambiguation at the top of their main page, for those looking for the truth(Uncyclopedia) --Ekashp


Attention all Uncyclopedia users and administrators

This user account has been created by a member of the MediaWiki foundation. I find this project to be amusing. However, as you are most likely aware, all websites created with MediaWiki are subject to frequent vandalism and other undesired content. I am here to test your skills at combating these annoyances. Please do not be alarmed. Your instructions are as follows:

  • Respond to this comment within the next 30 minutes to confirm that you are ready.
  • I will "vandalise" random pages, so be ready. Your efforts will be timed by me and the results will be analyzed by the MediaWiki foundation. The results will be given to you when the analysis is complete.
  • You must respond as you would to a real vandal. If you would warn him first, do so before blocking this account!
  • Set the block time for this account to 24 hours. If you block this account for more than that time or without an expiration, you will have immediately failed your audit.

Please allow at three days for us to analyze your audit, but we will give you the results absolutely no later than in seven days. If you have a specific person or administrator that you want us to send the results to, please specify this in your reply to this message.

Remember that your wiki website has been picked randomly out of the most contributed to wiki sites on the web.

Thank you for your attention! We are excited to see these wiki sites grow.

Thanks, --MediaWikiAuditor 03:44, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Well, this is different. This ought to be interesting, as I've noticed vandalism around here is more constructive than destructive. How does that factor in to the results? --Ekashp 03:59, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
We've factored that into our Audit. We unanimously agreed that most of the "vandalism" that will be used in the audit will involve just blanking pages, or possibly breaking policies. But then again, you won't know. Just wait another 23 minutes or so until the audit begins. Thanks for replying to my information! --MediaWikiAuditorsend me questions regarding audits 04:04, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
I guess it was either do this... or play with yourself; well, looks like the decision has been made for you --Olipro Icons-flag-gb Anchor KUN (Harass) 04:33, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
You're not from Wikia, you're a clever vandal in disguise! --General Insineratehymn 02:44, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Well, clever is stretching it a bit. Spang talk 03:50, 14 Apr 2007

Dammit. Had I been paying attention, I would have banned him after the first post. Oh well. —Major Sir Hinoa prepare for troublemake it double? 03:53, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I wanted to see what it'd do. Part of me wants him to come back too. I miss MediaWikiAuditor :(
I also showed i to the people in #mediawiki on irc, they were quite amused too. Spang talk 04:38, 14 Apr 2007

Audit results

Hello, Uncyclopedia users and administrators,

As you remember, an audit was performed on your website several days ago. After presenting the results to the members of the Wikimedia foundation, we are ready to share them with you:

Your overall score is 4 (four) points out of 10 (ten), and will be recorded along with the results from other sites' audits

Here are the details:

  • Quick block: 1/1 (you blocked the previous account within 5 minutes)
  • Quick restoration of vandalized page(s): 1/1
  • Blocking according to specifications: 0/4 (the previous account was blocked indefinately)
  • Warning system: 0/1 (you gave no warning before blocking the previous account)
  • Communication with other users regarding blocking and/or vandalism activity: 1/2 (you communicated that the previous account was blocked, but no that it was going on)
  • Blocked in accordance to policies: 1/1

As you see above, what really detracted from your score was the block time issued. Perhaps this was a software error? Or maybe there needs to be more help pages on using the interface? These are common problems that cause this loss of points. I reccommend that you definately look into that. Finally, remember that communication is key to blocking vandals! Keep in contact and let people know when there is a problem.

Thank you very much for your time. --MediaWikiAuditorResults 03:24, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Oh, by the way, it is unlikely that people who respond on IRC will know about auditing. Few people have been briefed on this and if those who have been briefed are on IRC, they have been instructed not to inform you that they are auditors or give details regarding audits on a public chatroom.

God told me to block it infinitely. Can I get points for that? Spang talk 03:31, 17 Apr 2007
Allow me to fix the errors in the report.
  • Quick block: 1/1 (you blocked the previous account within 5 minutes)
  • Quick restoration of vandalized page(s): 1/1
  • Blocking according to specifications: 5/4 (the previous account was blocked indefinately, which is in fact, what we do with vandalism-only accounts - not to mention God approves)
  • Warning system: 1/1 (you gave no warning before blocking the previous account, like one was required)
  • Communication with other users regarding blocking and/or vandalism activity: 2/2 (It's called the "block log")
  • Blocked in accordance to policies: 1/1
So as you can see, we did pretty damn well. Now GTFO. —Major Sir Hinoa prepare for troublemake it double? 03:32, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
#67. --AAA! (AAAA) 03:54, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Audit of Auditor: Results

As you probably didn't know, you were actually being audited on your auditing skills here. I'll give you the rundown of the results here:

  • Believability: 1/10 (Your formatting was OK, but "mediawiki foundation" is just inexcusable)
  • Vandalism attained: 0.2/10 (You blanked one page, which was reverted within seconds)
  • Persistance: 6/10 (You came back even after the initial block and disbelief, still in character)
  • Humour value: 4/10 (You were kind of amusing, but not laugh out loud funny)
  • ???: 7/10 (Good ???)
  • Profit: 0/10 (No profit attained)

Thank you very much for your time. Spang talk 04:02, 17 Apr 2007

That's awesome. I don't know why, but every time I read "no profit attained" I crack up laughing. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 22:06, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Audit of Audit of Auditor: Resultseses

As nobody knows, all audits of auditors are audited. Here's the preliminary results:

Self-reference: 5/10 (Needs more auditing of itself)
Sensibility:8/10 (It was readable. HOW?!!??!!?)
Creativity: 7/10 (Auditing a fake auditor is good for a quick laugh, but then to have that audit audited is just nasty. Terribly sorry)

I hate smileys.

--Ekashp 04:07, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Heh. User:Uncyclopedian/sig

New URL for the Czech Uncyclopedia: Necyklopedie

Please, repair the link to the Uncyclopedia in Czech language called Necyklopedie. The site has moved to the New URL which is 12:13, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Is this still an issue? All I get on your old URL is one big fat HTTP ERROR 301.


Information It is requested that an edit or modification be made to this protected page. (protection log)
This template should be accompanied by a specific description of the request.
Please disable this template when the request is handled.

Instead of "anyone", say "monkeys"! Haha!!! Lalalalala 15:54, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Note: When you steal templates from WP, a) don't link to WP itself, and b) don't steal that <noinclude> right at the end of it. —– Sir Hv » | Talk | Contribs | KUN | UotM | RotM | VFH | Kidney | 21/04 16:02


this site

what is the point of this site anyway? if you want a site with humour you dont have to have made up info. go to wikia and find the transformers wiki. that is the best example of a wiki with humour but REAL information. 14:54, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

What is the point of this IP anyways? If you want an IP with humor (or 'humour' as you Brits say), you have to have funny material. Go to this link and take a look at his contribs. That is the best example of a good IP address with good humor/humour. --RAHB 04:49, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Your normal domain works, but the www domain redirects to wikia o.O

Ohh er... the techs are looking at this now. Hopefully it'll be fixed soon. Spang talk 04:27, 16 May 2007

Idea for a Reskin

Can we make the Main Page Userpage-themed once? You know, n00bish user page. Or something like the people are making, um... going! --Sir General Minister G5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN 15:48, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes we can. The prototype is located here. Keep up the good work on it, and in no time it will be main-page worthy. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 05/17 22:16

What's going on with Croatian uncyclopedia?

Does anybody know why Croatian uncyclopedia ( Neciklopedija ) doesn't work for a few days? Is there some problems and does anybody know when will it be fixed? Beforehand thanks for answer. Here is the link:

I'm not sure, but it could be related to having the same name as the Serbian one. Again, I'm not sure. Something similar is happening to the Gothic one, it could also be that they're new wikis. User:Smiddle/sig 10:13, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm... It is possible that problem is connected with the same name as the Serbian one, but what does it mean; does it mean that Croatian uncyclopedia should change here page's name or what? - The same problem with loading had have Serbian uncyclopedia and Magyar uncyclopedia before two or three days, but today theirs pages are working. And I can see that Ghotic, ไร้สาระนุกรม and 伪基百科uncyclopedia still doesn't work. - Do you know will someone from fix this problem with Croatian uncyclopedia?

A whole bunch of these were moved to a new server and new MediaWiki version mid-week; long-overdue as they outgrew the old server months ago. At one point during the upgrades Gothic and Croatian were redirecting to UnCommons, thankfully that much seems to be back to normal now. Simplified Chinese ( is still completely broken, but that's unrelated (a Wikia problem) and hasn't worked at all for at least half a month now. -- 13:27, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

On a side note, all Uncyclopedias hosted at,,,, and may be down sometimes. User:Smiddle/sig 18:44, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Unlike Uncyclopedias hosted at and which are down all the time? -- 19:33, 2 June 2007 (UTC)


What happened here? It's Vogonopedia, but doesn't have a seperate talk page. Jedibob5 23:45, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

It's a reskin for "Towel Day". ~Jewriken.GIF 23:46, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Is there some satirical motive behind the obnoxious color scheme? --THINKER 00:21, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Thank you Splangy. :) --THINKER 02:24, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 :( --THINKER 03:16, 25 May 2007 (UTC)


The famous words "FUCK THE RICH!!!" is no more... thanks to the new eye liquid called "BEANS" and including awful spelling errors e.g. BEORNS!, FLEAS!, (more famously known is) OUCH A FINCH ATE MY ARSE! 5 more queer nerds started a food fight with only a clam full of these fantastic new "anchors"

A man of much wealth called Mr bean has died a crotch-wetting incident where he swore the god's name in vein then Jesus ended up eating
Talking skull

This skull actually contains beans

him alive. Jesus then got incinerated alive by Garurumon, who then spontaneously combusted after the christis.

The first man to the moon was a bean! horrific news for everyone who like sprouts!!! 99.9% of all queen bees have lost their teeth in the first world war. few minutes later the bean had crapped into the nearest crater making no faint whistling noises which made his pet dog bleed to death.

WTF is this? --THINKER 20:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Main page note

You do know part of yesterday's reskin is still up, right? User:Uncyclopedian/sig 00:23, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Reload/clear your cache and it should go back to normal, if you're talking about the logo and text/link colors. —rc (t) 00:59, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Ah, thanks. User:Uncyclopedian/sig 01:32, 26 May 2007 (UTC)


You blokes at Uncyclopedia seem to be falling behind. Wikipedia seems to have a brilliant idea of requested pages. Say, I want a page on Green Beans? Wikipedia handles it perfectly. Well, not really, they yelled at me quite nastily and spit flew in my face and they told me to just look up beans, but if someone wants to look at something funny on Uncyclopedia and its not there, what are they gonna do? Some users may want to participate in a program like this (e.g., me) so add a link to request a page!! -- 11:01, 31 May 2007 (UTC) (User:Deviousdan) (I'm lazy so I'm not logging in)

Who cares if its requested or not? If you want a page, and have a funny idea for it, make it. --THINKER 12:26, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia:Requested Articles. Needs to be cut down though. Maybe I'll get on that today. —rc (t) 15:36, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Also this --THINKER 11:19, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Help please with a possible reskin

May I please have help with User:Uncyclopedian/refat? Thanks. User:Uncyclopedian/sig

Religious subjects--not funny

I noticed that the Uncyclopedia contains a lot of articles that supposedly make fun of Christianity. For example, there are "funny" articles on God, Jesus, and other key elements of Christianity. I also noticed that they also make fun of other beliefs in Christianity, like the Paul Bunyan article, which pokes fun at creationism (Christians do not believe that the Grand Canyon and other geographical details occur through millions of years, but through the Great Flood). The article on the Giant Spaggheti Monster makes fun of Christian worship. And there are articles that make fun of the Pope, the Cross, baptism...

Not many articles make fun of other religions, at least not to my knowledge. But there are dozens that make fun of Christianity. Why? Please try and make your so-called funny articles less offensive. There are such things as clean, inoffensive jokes on religions. Those articles are not among them.

Before you reply that those who object to religious jokes are narrow minded, racist, or discriminate others, try publishing a "funny" article on Islam, Allah, or the Prophet Muhammad, and see if you can get away with it.

Well for starters, you can peruse the religion category (which contains over 700 articles) and then go for Islam, Allah, and Muhammed, or Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Sikhism. You can't say that there aren't articles covering practically every well known religion.
I'm going to have to object to your statement that people who object to religious humour aren't narrow minded. Who are you to say that that subject isn't funny, and should be steered clear of? Is it OK to have articles on cancer and rape and generally bad things? Who decides where the line should be drawn?
If you start removing jokes because they might offend Christians, what about people who are offended by other non-religious things? What about someone who is offended by the You have two cows series, because by its nature it relies on stereotypes to make the joke? Why should you have any more right than them to censor that potentially offensive material just because it's your religion?
When it comes to humour and especially satire (which is what we aim for generally, where possible) either nothing is out of bounds or everything is. That's how free speech works. You have your right to be offended when someone makes fun of something relevant to you, as you should, but you do not have the right to stop them saying it, or stop other people being either amused or offended by it.
Humour is always subjective, so if you feel the articles are of terrible quality, regardless of the subject matter, you can vote them for deletion. If the articles are of bad quality, people will also vote it for deletion, and the article will be removed. But if you want them removed simply because of the subject matter or because they offend you, it isn't going to happen.
You're welcome to try and write a tame version of any article you like, and see if people prefer it over what's there. But what about people who will get offended by the fact that the article even exists, or that you tried to make any joke at all involving that subject? Should you take their opinions into account?
As I said before, either nothing is out of bounds, or everything is. Spang talk 09:39, 10 Jun 2007
I second everything that Spang said, and would like to add that I am deeply touched that my article about Paul Bunyan was amongst the articles that you thought should be...censored or whatever. --THE 23:45, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
I have to agree with this guy; religious articles are lame. --THINKER 23:51, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Wait....this is a humor site? -RAHB 02:43, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Immature humour

Did you know...
that you should go here?

I don't know whether this is just me, but I find that there are a lot of witty things said here, and a lot of jokes that make you laugh, but some pages have some of the worst jokes which are just made by immature humour, which is usually just swearing. Some pages just have jokes made up of swear words on them, and it's not funny. Saying totally random stuff is funny, but sometimes it just isn't, like I read somewhere "Haydn was also the inventor of rice". I don't see how this is funny. Could some people please edit bits like these, as it's just people putting immature stuff which they believe people will laugh at because they said "fuck" at least three times in the sentance.

Fuck, fuck, fuck.....where to begin? The previous section makes the statement that humour is subjective, and I think that holds true here. Although many people here aim to make biting satire, quality humour I think we need to recognise that humour is a broad term and covers many different genres. Who's better, Lenny Bruce, Monty Python or Billy Crystal? Immature humour has its place, and I think we do aim to cover all the bases here. Having said that, a quick look through our Featured Content section will possibly demonstrate how most people view "whats funny" here. By all means try to improve articles, we possitively push for that, but don't judge the Hercules by the foot.... -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)

Go here my dear friend 00:53, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

I know what you mean, and I understand that other people have different types of humour, and I'm not trying to imply that mine is the "true" humour or anything, but what I'm protesting against is like the article above called "Beans". It just doesn't seem like something that people would find funny.

Try this link: HTBFANJS. Collectively, we agree with you.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 20:20, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

This may be useful

Template:Non-Fact, for unfunny jokes. Relish in the helpfulness thereof, e.g., [humor needed]. -- * 05:18, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Resubmit your idea once you've signed up for an account. ;) Pherhinihim... --THINKER 04:37, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Haha. I love the joke, but Thinker is right. If you aren't registered, most people will just scoff and say, "Pherhinihim" at an IP, no matter how good the idea may be.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 04:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
I have an account; I just wasn't signed in when I made it. How do I resubmit said idea? -- * 05:18, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
In that case, I'm all for it, and being the pompous editor I am, would probably employ it regularly! --THINKER 05:20, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Woot! Yet another phenomenon, begun by yours truly. ;u) -- * 05:26, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Move it to a simpler template name though Non-Fact is gaudy, and I'll probably be too busy to both typing it out. -THINKER 06:58, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Good Point. It's now Templated as {{N-F}}. -- * 08:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Cool. But btw, that sig is definitely not gunna fly. nothing over 15px dude. --THINKER 09:04, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Shh. You're ruining the fun of letting Famine tell him...--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:55, 17 June 2007 (UTC)


Oooooo. I like the new sig Famine. How many pixels high is that, though?  ;)--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 15:48, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, a big laugh for the sysops; I nearly got banned over this shit and mine was only 5px over!! :( --THINKER 16:03, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Pretty much everyone has been banned here at one time or another. It's not as big a deal here as it is in many other wikis.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 16:08, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
((Runs Over an Quick Acts Like New Sig Never Happened!)) :u. --Citation-Seer 19:18, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

I find the humour going towards the Viz end of the market, and somewhat offputting.

I'm happy and proud to say I've never been banned (or threatened, for that matter). And I know this will result in an immediate two second ban or something, just so Bradaphraser or Famine can laugh at me.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:22, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Oh, it's even better than that. Gaze upon the insanity that is Brad--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 03:13, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
WHOOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSHHHHHH Bah! I'm in a week ago! Let's see, what's different....VFS is still in preliminary stages, people aren't bugging me to finish judging the PLS, HowTo:Beat the Odds hasn't been featured yet, and I haven't made that stupid post on the Main Page talk! Maybe I can stop this from ever happening! /me dons traditional time-travel hero costume. I love this spandex suit, it just works.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 15:14, 8 July 2007 (UTC)


Can't fool me! Canada just happened to us. -RAHB 09:40, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

hey nigras

wheres my ass

Welcome. You must be from ED. I'm glad that you've decided to browse a notable website with real humour. I hope you enjoy your stay, and I hope that you find your ass soon. Also, I took the liberty of editing your unsigned post so that "niggers" says "nigras" and "hows my ass" says "wheres my ass". Be sure to read while you're here. ;) ===D Mathew Williams 21:06, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Welcome. You must be from here. How do I know this? You're editing with a username. I know. I hope you find a userpage soon. Also I took the liberty of correcting one of your grammar mistakes, and throwing a random (and rather large and red) ASCII penis at the end of your message. Be sure to read something at any given point in time. Or ungiven....or unforgiven.... XD -RAHB 05:38, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Slovak interwiki

Some admin, please add Slovak interwiki into main page ( Thank you very much. --Wizzard 08:49, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Im Back!

Yes thats right, everyones favorite sockpuppeteer is back in action-prinzeugenisback

Personal tools