From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lying article.
|This article was nominated for deletion on January 19, 2007.
The result of the discussion was 'Keep'.
Pure genius in four paragraphs!
--Jimmy Jazz 7th May, 2006
--MorningSciFi 23:27, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
edit From Pee Review
I found the article Lying on the VFD page and decided to take it on as a "pet project". It has been rewritten - Todd Lyons, Zombiebarron, Mhaille and Braydie have looked it over. I am seeking constructive help on punching it up. It would be helpful if the reviewer is critical to provide a bit more of a comment than "this section doesn't work" - I would like to know why it doesn't work so that I can improve it in the correct fashion and any helpful suugestions on how to make it better. Dame16:32, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
|Humour:||7||I agree with Kelpan - too many non sequiters spoilt the broth.|
|Concept:||8||I liked the idea of an Uncyclopedian article on lying; it'd be like Honesty.|
|Prose and formatting:||7||No mistakes I could spot, yet the set out wasn't too good.|
|Images:||5||Maybe too random.|
|Miscellaneous:||4||Speaking as an Australian, we would NEVER want Steve Bastard Irwin as Prime Minister. I strongly object to being a)given a stereotype like Steve Irwin and b)getting such a clot as him for Prime Minister. We thought Howard was bad.|
|Final Score:||31||Alright, not great.|
|Reviewer:||Ikabu 05:53, 21 March 2007 (UTC)|