This is very good and I don't think in one is going to fault it on any rational grounds. My only query is that is reads like a serious article about the issue of lurking - except for the captioned photos. Now I am probably missing a shed load of jokes but that is my initial impression. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 12:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Ahhh, yes. The narrator is passive-aggressively letting this lurker lurk around her, and herself is a lurker because her allowance of him to lurk is a form of lurking. Make more sense?  –  FuhQ.gifFuhQ  ZDsig.gifZDsig Sheenicon.gif (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 17:14, 2 June 2009
That does make more sense. Perhaps that part of her personality should be made a little clearer without making it to obvious. Or why not add that in the conclusion ? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 17:26, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Add - I don't want to suggest a change. Just perhaps a clearer clue. As I said , it is otherwise excellent and I will be a pro-voter if it goes to VFH. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 17:30, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Just an few extra question .Is the location important ? I was wondering where the 'foyer' was. Is the writer in an apartment complex or a school/college campus . --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 17:32, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
In the entrance/hallway of the writer's home.  –  FuhQ.gifFuhQ  ZDsig.gifZDsig Sheenicon.gif (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 18:39, 6 June 2009