Talk:Layman

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(From Pee Review)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
{{talkheader}}
  +
 
===From Pee Review===
 
===From Pee Review===
 
I seriously like ''self-reference'' style articles. And this is another attempt at doing one.
 
I seriously like ''self-reference'' style articles. And this is another attempt at doing one.

Latest revision as of 06:17, July 1, 2007

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Layman article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that.
For a listing of unused images related to this topic, please see the image subpage.

Article policies

edit From Pee Review

I seriously like self-reference style articles. And this is another attempt at doing one. Since the concept is easy but the content is hard I never really liked my ideas withing this style. This piece is the first thing that I believe stands half a chance ( with the odd help ofcource ). -- Vosnul 20:54, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Not bad. There's a lot of broken links, so here's a tip: before you link something, check whether or not there is an actual article. Also, run your piece through a spellcheck on Microsoft Word (or elsewhere) before you finalize it. I did it to your article, and noticed a lot of typos, so I fixed them. Great piece though. --emc! 22:50, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for you help and comments !. I dont have any MS stuff , but i'll get some better english spelling software. ( Me an uggabugga dutchy person, so english is not really native to me). -- Vosnul 22:58, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, this is good- I reckon a little more could be made of the complicated sections (employ a plethora of inordinately esoteric wordings) but it's funny --Jamtrousers 10:05, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Personal tools
projects