Talk:Incoherent

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

I love this article blue pandas & no more beans till the 4th of July chucks the rock. Red green invisible purpleness wishes they could jump into punching I LOVE GUM old testiculars. This is truly da spirit of ssentnerehocnI in Americka I am Rick=IameRicka I am Rick, a dirty man. Kanye West could not have big pie I give you a pie. Recognise the duty this article has duty is doody is poo, or least at find a good damn Beavers make dams home for it for beavers to make dams. i love rocks and fish and this article it . Why Rocky fist I just said I !!! love rocks. .#jk8947fkushfkjs that was the best good article spelled backwards Backwards spelled backwards is frontwards Spell is spelled S-P-E-L-L, unless finding Nemo is an honor, and it is not or is it no gum gum.--DiZ 20:08, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

edit From Pee Review

  • This is a very funny article. Can someone expand it? (It's another page I want to put on VFH) --Micoolio101 (whinevandalism) 08:26, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
I did a little. Writing incoherently is harder than I sweat.--Procopius 21:42, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Added one. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 08:37, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Same here. --AAA! (AAAA) 08:08, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

I found a hint. Look for speedy deletion candidates on Wikipedia since they are usually gibberish [1]. That's how I did it. --AAA! (AAAA) 06:24, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Totally funny. I combined several short passages of nonsense into longer passages of nonsense and added a bit.--Super90 10:16, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

I added a russian reversal; one that should fit very well into the article:

In Soviet Russia, {{noun}} {{verb plural}} YOU!!

--AAA! (AAAA) 08:38, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

I also added a retarded Bat fuck insane template. --AAA! (AAAA) 09:10, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Idea: Spork some stuff off Random humor. --AAA! (AAAA) 04:16, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

edit Feature?

To you think this page is ready for VFH yet? --AAA! (AAAA) 01:59, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps... --The fatgoat 22:09, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

edit From Pee Review

I know this article has had a pee review before, but I want to give it a second one so we can try and further improve the article to featured status. Right now, I want to see if the opening paragraph can be expanded and the image caption at the bottom (The one with all those people in a garden) can be rewritten. --AAA! (AAAA) 06:08, 24 March 2007 (UTC)


Humour: 7.5 It's definitely a funny article, some of the lines are absolutely hilarious.
Concept: 4 It's far too similar to Random Humor, if you ask me.
Prose and formatting: 7.5 Sure.
Images: 8 Very reflective on the subject.
Miscellaneous: 6 Not enough creativity, it needs some work setting itself apart.
Final Score: 33 33
Reviewer: --Agoistheman 18:40, 25 March 2007 (UTC)


Humour: 5 It's hard to laugh at jokes when one has to concentrate on just making it to the next sentence. See endnotes.
Concept: 6 Well, it's a reasonable subject for an article but stuff that's incoherent tends to end up on the VFD list...so it's a hard style to be happy about.
Prose and formatting: 5 The prose tends to be disjointed and hard to read.
Images: 6 OK pictures, intentionally irrelevant.
Miscellaneous: 6 I have difficulties liking this piece -- it is incoherent, yes, but that does not make it good and may, in fact, make it bad.
Final Score: 28
Reviewer: --OEJ 18:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC)


Endnotes: I found this hard to read because after a very short time I did not give a darn about what was going on -- it's so random it's predictable. I couldn't predict specifically what would happen next, but I knew it would be just another thing that would have nothing to do with anything.

In my lousy opinion, randomness does not equal a good article on incoherence.

What might be better is an article that is always right on the edge of coming together and making sense, but then slips off into self-contradiction or something. --OEJ 18:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Humour: 3 IMHO, "But grandma failed because my toy train went swimming in the piano" is utterly hilarious. Love the formula and the guy running in a circle. Not much else though.
Concept: 8 I like the concept but nonsense is not incoherence.
Prose and formatting: 2 As said above, nonsense.
Images: 2 As said above, nonsense.
Miscellaneous: 5 I like the potential of the subject, but to pull it off you'd have to make a rambling piece that goes nowhere, much like what OEJ said.
Final Score: 20 Despite what is said by OEJ or Agoistheman, it's not really incoherent. Incoherence is rambling like gramps does, or the one-sided conversation you have with a ranting hobo, not drivel. Think "Granmpa Simpson". I disagree with previous reviews in this regard, hence the third review. As such, I'd recommend a rewrite because you're off topic, but the concept is excellent so long as you aren't remaking random humour.]
Reviewer: (Gir. 23:52, 26 March 2007 (UTC))


edit Comment

In my opinion, "MY GODDAMN BUGGY! HIJACKED BY LEVELERS!" did it for me. --General Insineratehymn 19:33, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Personal tools
projects