OK, after much <s>stinking</s> ''thinking'' I find that the bulk of this article was written to ''mock and deride'' the 12-year-old skank-boy use of "homo" as derogatory gay-hating slang. Therefore the insertion of undescended-testicle skank-boy "jokes" about "anus of altarboy" and bathhouses and feces runs counter to the rest of the article. '''''So I edited them out.'''''
OK, after much <s>stinking</s> ''thinking'' I find that the bulk of this article was written to ''mock and deride'' the 12-year-old skank-boy use of "homo" as derogatory gay-hating slang. Therefore the insertion of undescended-testicle skank-boy "jokes" about "anus of altarboy" and bathhouses and feces runs counter to the rest of the article. '''''So I edited them out.'''''
−
There are plenty of places on Uncyclopedia where people like Jaysandkays can write pre-adolescent homophobic insults. The ''Homo'' article is not the place for them. This article points out -- at boringly elaborate length -- that a 12-year-old's characterization of "homo" as a terrible insult is silly as sucking sheep shit in a sandstorm. So, you 12-year-olds, lets just leave them out of the article, shall we? --[[User:One-eyed Jack|--OEJ]] 20:05, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
+
:There are plenty of places on Uncyclopedia where people like Jaysandkays can write pre-adolescent homophobic insults. The ''Homo'' article is not the place for them. This article points out -- at boringly elaborate length -- that a 12-year-old's characterization of "homo" as a terrible insult is silly as sucking sheep shit in a sandstorm. So, you 12-year-olds, lets just leave them out of the article, shall we? --[[User:One-eyed Jack|--OEJ]] 20:05, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
OK, after much stinkingthinking I find that the bulk of this article was written to mock and deride the 12-year-old skank-boy use of "homo" as derogatory gay-hating slang. Therefore the insertion of undescended-testicle skank-boy "jokes" about "anus of altarboy" and bathhouses and feces runs counter to the rest of the article. So I edited them out.
There are plenty of places on Uncyclopedia where people like Jaysandkays can write pre-adolescent homophobic insults. The Homo article is not the place for them. This article points out -- at boringly elaborate length -- that a 12-year-old's characterization of "homo" as a terrible insult is silly as sucking sheep shit in a sandstorm. So, you 12-year-olds, lets just leave them out of the article, shall we? ----OEJ 20:05, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
