Talk:George W. Bush/archive

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search


This article might be further from the truth than just writing that George W Bush is a moron but that doesn't make it funny.
You didn't even read what I said, and that is why you fail young Skywalker.


I like to see a bit of humour about in uncyclopedia...

Not very funny

whats with the hurricane katrina bit? that is not funny in the slightest

Booooooooooooooo-[gasps for air]-ooooooooooooooorrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr-[gasps for air again]-rrrriiiiiiinnnggg!

Delete this page. It makes me sad.

Then dont come on it.

Looser.

NOT FUNNY AT ALL

This page is not even SLIGHTLY funny, and thats a problem. This is Uncyclopedia, not Wikipedia, in case some of you forgot. Its ridiculously stupid that just because some people support our president that there has to be a supportive, mostly truthful (oh the horror) page. I'm sure some people on this site like bands like My Chemical Romance and such, but you dont see them complaining that they need a truthful page to make their favorite bands look good. This is fucking America, and free speech is allowed (even on Uncyclopedia). This is setting a bad precedent, and in my opinion, this should be taken to VFD. And I just might do it... Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN --05:17, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
You have no idea why this is funny at all, and it shows. If it was here out of "political correctness" or actual "support", it wouldn't be highlighting how "awesome" the President is as satire.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 04:33, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
But at the same time, you have people here like Rei, who like this article because it portrays Dubya positively...I still find George Dubya Bush much better, in any case. Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN --23:43, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Ok. I just did the tiniest, laziest, most basic form of research on that little accusation of yours against Rei (that he's some Republican stooge placed here to make Georgie smell like a rose on this satire site). It's true, Rei is the most protective user of this page in its current form. However, I'm almost 100% sure he's not a Republican. How did I to this research? I clicked on Rei's link a little ways down this page. On his userpage, you'll see Rei did most of the images for George Dubya Bush, the article you believe is far superior to this one in humor content and "free speech." This once again proves that this article IS based on irony and not some kind of weak-ass attempt to achieve "political correctness."
I think the bigger issue here is that you are so intolerant of ideas that clash with your own that your reaction is simply to purge them from the internet entirely, a rather alarming attitude if I do say myself. If you're so intolerant of views that clash with your own that you can't tolerate anything that even pretends, mockingly, to support George W. Bush, then maybe you should re-evaluate YOUR commitment to free speech, not the humor content of this article. I'm not saying this article is A Modest Proposal, I'm just saying that some people can and do find it funny for its "flimsy, transparent irony." Pages that bash Bush are a dime a dozen. We made this one to try a different take on Bush humor. The same four jokes over and over again (Bush is stupid, Bush is corrupt, Bush is a puppet of the neocons, Bush is a daddy's boy) are only funny for so long before they get repetitive. But that's just my two cents, take it or leave it.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:35, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
I understand and respect what you're saying, but you have my motives wrong. I'm not threatening free speach, I'm just saying that this article is a little too truthful for Uncyclopedia. Albeit ironic, there are many facts in the article (regarding the war, terms of presidency, etc.) I didnt want this to be a flamewar, and I didnt VFD it, I just think this article is too close to fact...And apparently so do other users, as when it was VFH'd it got a score of -6 in a matter of hours. Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN --01:52, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
I WANT A FLAMEWAR, DAMN IT!  ;) In all seriousness, though, the fact this was so reviled at VFH did bring up the fact that people aren't appreciating the ironic angle, so I have been trying to add some more links and such that kinda give hints to the mocking tone the article is supposed to be read with. Criticism is appreciated, but I took exception to the fact that many users (not just you), have cried foul on the basis of free speech, which isn't a valid argument, IMHO. So long as the text at first glance is glowing and adoring Bush, I encourage anyone and everyone to add links that, if read in the context of the article, completely change the tone, meaning, and tenor to mock Bush's "Presidency."--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 02:29, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
I see your point, and upon reading the whole thing, I see what you mean. Before I just skimmed and it seemed too fact-filled. Its better now than it was a week ago, anyway. And by the way, I'll always take 2 cents. I need it to feed my family of 34. Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN --06:39, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

WTF, THIS PAGE IS NOT FUNNY!!!!!!

I second that. Someone ripped off the whitehouse.gov info page on Dubya and added it here. Please fix this article now before they sue uncyclopedia over copyright infringements. :(
Seconded again. Whole article is really fucking disappointing - flimsy irony, very transparent that authors are shit-scared of thinking. Hereby vote all bush related articles for deletion since you guys are too pansy to be proper funny.


Dissent during wartime is the most horrible thing you can do**. You terrorists just don't want the truth about our great leader to get out! The "Blame America First" crowd would rather see the country in flames than possibly admit that he could be right. He is our commander in chief, and you must show respect for the office**! Go on over to George Dubya Bush if you hate America this much.
Support our president**! -- Rei 04:28, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
** - Statement expires on January 20th, 2009.
Bullshit! That's why we have freedom of speech! We can say that Bush sucks ass. And I agree: This article sucks ass too. It's not truthful and it's not funny. Whatever your view is on Bush, he has donde NOTHING, I repeat, NOTHING to make this world a better place. I OWN God 23:37, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
By insulting our president, you're emboldening the terrorists. Dissent at home gives them ammunition abroad. Congratulations -- you can blame the death of our brave men and women protecting freedom overseas on your loose lips. You and your cheese-eating France-loving terrorist-coddling liberal friends.
Oh, and God supports Republicans, too. Why do you hate God? -- Rei 04:02, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

You guys forgot the part about him being a robot. Put it in. George W. Cheney is our hero.


who wrote this, was it the press officer of the president. glorius, golden, wowowowowow A president with a war that was basec on lies. A president who is payed by the oil industry.

nothing was glorius or golden.

I hear you, but that's not the point. You seem to have us confused with Wikipedia. Uncyclopedia is (or is supposed to be) a humor website, not The Truth™. If you believe anything you read here, then I have this bridge I want to sell you. :D —Hinoa KUN (talk) 12:40, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Isn't this page a bit serious?

You can never be too serious when it comes to our one true saviour, George W. Bush. Spang talk 16:52, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
I touched him and then I could walk! (after the leg-irons were removed, anyway)


Yes this article is funny, because it uses deadpan humor. The picture of George W. Bush curing lepers in Iraq should have been a dead give-a-way to that. Another one is that the facts were checked by Fox News for the article. Maybe most of you just plain don't read the village dump, but Forum:George W. Bush pretty much says it all. A lot of us planned this quite a while ago and people could have objected to it back then. That'll teach you to read our public forums here. --2nd_Lt Orion Blastar (talk) 02:42, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Humor that requires someone to explain to you that "Yes this actually is humor" is not good humor. nxsty 11:03, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
People who need this article explained to them are morans who worship Moloch anyway, thus they lack a soul, thus they lack a sense of humor. Which means you just told on yourself! Pwn3d! Now kindly STFU. --2nd_Lt Orion Blastar (talk) 23:44, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
i have to agree, i hate the president yet i still found this article amusing, such as when he was "hand picked by god during the florda standoff" or when texas left the pos of gov. open forever because no one could do a better job than george aka "w" for wonderful haha. good work.75.31.73.214 18:36, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Congrats, it took brains to figure that out. It proves that you have a soul, and thus have a sense of humor. It shows how smart you are that you used critical thinking to figure out this article was funny. We left a lot of clues in the article that we are joking and that it is a joke, and need not be explained. Just that morans who worship Moloch sold their souls and cannot figure out the humor here. --2nd_Lt Orion Blastar (talk) 23:48, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

What happened to humor?

“It went to hell.....it died, and it went to hell!”
~ everybody who dislikes this article on what happened to humor

This article started out funny enough, but then quickly declined. There is so much more that could have easily been done to this topic to make it much more comical. And I am a Republican and can easily see that. How did this thing get voted in as a favorite?! What the hell has this nation come to?!?

This isn't about humor. This is about giving all due respect to our commander in chief. If you ridicule the commander in chief during war time, you're giving aid and comfort to the terrorists. Stand behind our president! -- Rei 22:17, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
The only way I'll stand behind that inarticulate moron is to shove a red hot poker up his arse! Only one more year of hearing 'nukular' instead of 'nuclear' - hooray!!
Bush doesn't say "nukular" -- he says "nuclear", and pronounces it correctly: new-kyew-lehr. That's how it's pronounced; look it up in the Becktionary. Besides -- why do YOU hate America so much? America -- love it or leave it! -- Rei 18:57, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Are you deaf as well as stupid?? Must be that Red State education in action. And what the fuck is a Becktionary??? Something they published over at FOX News 8 years ago? The word is correctly pronounced NEW-KLEE-AR. There's no way to get a "KYEW" sound from a word spelled NUCLEAR unless your a mush-brained Texan. I bet the tard also says WARSH for WASH. I don't hate America - I hate our arse-fucking prick of a president. AMERICA - love it or CHANGE it!!
As they say, if you're not with him, you're with the terrorists. Spang talk 22:20, 24 April 2006 (UTC)


Is this article supposed to be fun? If that's the case where is the "fun" part? This just looks like any serious pro-Bush article- --nxsty 17:31, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

We will suport our cammander in chief if he was a good one but bush just plain sucks and anyone who doesnt think so is retarded

Bush sucks ass. What? Did I just bring down the North and South Towers? I OWN God 23:42, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Truth be told, I wish someone would shoot this guy! Everyone good has already been shot (EX: Abraham Lincoln, J.F.K., the guy that come after J.F.K., ect.). Why not bush? I OWN God 23:42, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
hes got a point, and if you remove the shot part and repalce it with killed, then we can add jesus to that list as well
bush won't be shot because it's the people who support bush that are the "democracy only works when it goes our way" type who shoot presidents without southern accents or that weren't cowboy actors

I love it how everyone is totally taking Rei seriously. Oh, and nuclear is in the rhyming Becktionary.--Got Milk? 03:56, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Are you guys completely batshit fucking crazy? He can say shit however the fuck he wants, i don't give a shit how he pronounces a word as long as he gets the job done.

Amen to that! And if anyone knows how to get jobs done, it's Bush. That's a man who never starts something which he can't finish. Thank Jesus that we have a compassionate conservative in the White House. -- Rei 15:41, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Lol, nice sarcasm. 76.84.12.144 22:48, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
God, this bickering has no point......As Teddy Roosevelt said; blind obedience of your country or your president, not caring if it's right, is unpatriotic.And if you love Bush and the conservative way so much, try conservapedia. Colin "All your base" Heaney October 29, 2007.
Never! We must support our current president. If not, then the liberals, and, consequently, the terrorists win! Do you want to be the one with the terrorists winning on your conscience? I didn't think so! Oh, and conservapedia is a shining glorious light in a darkening internet! They have revealed the numerous examples of bias in Wikipedia(For example, did you ever notice that wikipedia not even once mentions that Jesus saves? Not even once! It's clearly the liberals' propaganda at work!) So, as you can see, our president is a hero. A hero! God bless America! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 18:46, Oct 29
(Good fucking Jesus, I hope you're joking.)[--Colin "All your base" Heaney 23:26, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

suggestion

I cleaned up the George Dubya Bush article quite a bit. Do you think we could have a link to that page from this one?

Perhaps something along the lines of "There is a tiny fraction of the populace that hasn't embraced the true greatness that is George Walker 'Wonderful' Bush. Just like Fox News is Fair and Balanced, we strive to be as well and suggest reading this page (insert link to Dubya article) for the un-American, commie, pinko view."

Thoughts?

Actually...
This page has been screened by FOXNews for authenticity and impartiality, and has "terror-proof" protection for her pleasure. For our foreign visitors, see Biography of President George W. Bush in foreign talk.
...has been at the top of the rewrite from the beginning, with the link to Dubya. We certainly don't want people actually thinking we're PRO-Bush, dear God no.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 00:59, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Ummmm...oops. I didn't notice where that linked to. My Bad. As an aside, would it possible to slightly alter the text to make it more obvious that the link will lead to a more...alternative viewpoint? User:Docmeltdown

Be my guest, but be sure to mention terrorists when you do.  :)--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 16:14, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Ok...I tweaked it just a tad. Let me know what you think. User:Docmeltdown

Our response has been launched and should arrive at your house, shortly. (Note: please do not hide in a spiderhole, as it will require more troops than we're willing to commit to find you. Thanks.)
In all seriousness, we'll revert it if we hate it.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 22:50, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

misquotation

Jesus Christ: 'Who is not against us, is with us'. George W Bush: 'Who is not with us, is against us'. Think about it. Or don't think about it. whatever


The Patriot Act Should be 'The U.S.A. P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act'

Shouldn't that be Reichstag Fire Decree, with the basis for this law being that the fourth 9/11 plane (which was crashed into an abandoned minesite in Pennsylvania) was intended by its hijackers to target the US Congress and destroy the Capitol building? --Carlb 21:08, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

I got the joke!

To figure it out, search the quotations at the end in google.

All I can say is L O L!

Add



{{Darth}} to the page

No, sorry, that doesn't fit with the page at all. That'll almost certainly get reverted if you do add it. Spang talk 19:01, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Wait, why wasn't this added? Oh, right, because it goes on George Dubya Bush instead. Who, I mean, is a whole other person! Right?--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:33, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

anality

That first quote was by Bill Clinton. Just had to say that.

Thank you!

Even the George Dubya Bush article is funnier now, while it used to be the kind of random crap that you can read in forums for morons. --129.241.146.201 20:52, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Agreed. This page sucks. Random Guy With An IP Address Who Made An Account 18:05, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Supporting your leader during war?

That's a load of bull...Uncyclopedia is meant for lies. You can support Bush all you want on Wikipedia. Uncyclopedia is meant to be random lies for people who really have nothing better to do. When someone reads about random things here, no one actually takes them seriously. For instance, Dave Mustaine was raised by wolverines-that was from an episode of Duck Dodgers...no one is actually believes that he was raised by wolverines. So, when u say Bush has been diagnosed with mental retardation no one is going to believe it; Infact, the only reason they laugh is because its the farthest thing from the truth.

except in this case it might not be

And just when this page started to get some humor ...

... Rei got back and reverted it all. :( nxsty 09:33, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Ok, okay, back by popular demand.  :) -- Rei 16:08, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Nice! nxsty 09:03, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

this article sucks

It's not funny.

Fixes For This Page

Obviously this page needs help. First, as the above discussions have made all too clear, this page needs to be funny. Okay, how about ironic. Would you believe this page should be a parody of something? Next, there should be links to the other Bush-related Unpages. There should be that Bush family template. However, none of this can be done until people can edit it. What is this? Wikipedia running away from Stephen Colbert? Either allow people to make this page funny, or get rid of it: VFD. IMHO--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 21:35, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

And your suggestions are? We've been taking into account people's suggestions, so if you have something new, please suggest it. And, FYI, you *can* edit it. -- Rei 06:03, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
I wanted to link to HowTo:Write a speech for George W. Bush and add one of those halo pictures --WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 01:30, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
Feel free to hook that into the see-also section and rip the halo picture for whatever articles you want.  :) -- Rei 15:23, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
Okay.--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 21:16, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Please add - You have omitted one of Mr Bush's pet dogs, a small poodle named Tony Blair. Also there is nothing on his international reputation, something like "George W Bush is admired and respected throughout the rest of the World, for his intellect, negotiating skills, and deep understanding of complex international issues... he is also highly regarded for his tireless efforts for world peace and protecting the environment... spontaneous demonstrations of support for Mr Bush are commonplace, especially in Europe and in Arab countries..."Poujeaux 13:31, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

you missed the fact that he is also admired for his supurb speaking skills and unrivalled mastery of the American language with his huge vocublary
I just hooked in Blair as one of Bush's dogs in a "subtle link" style. Feel free to add your other text -- it sounds great. I especially like the last line. -- Rei 15:23, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

You're such a fucking comedian Rei, no, seriously, Blair as one of Bush's dogs, i'm pissing myself laughing here. Oh, yeah, lets not forget to add a Oscar Wilde reference here, you know, just to "shake things up", I know how you love being the funny man and all, but, and here's the thing, YOU'RE NOT. No one here thinks your ideas are funny, relevent, or even compelling, and i'm sorry to say that you have wasted your time. If you want to discuss this delusion you're having, email me at pullyourbottomlipoveryourheadandswallow@fuckyourself.com, i'll be glad to help.

Couldn't think of how else to add it that wouldn't make it sound like Britain is anywhere close to an equal of the US. I hope you're not trying to say that Britain is *better* than America, now are you? People used to get tarred and feathered for talk like that. -- Rei 18:24, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

How stupid

I thought Uncyclopedia was supposed to make fun of articles not promote them in such a way has to make a fukin idiot look like a hero!

You are joking, right? You really do understand that descriptions like the wholesome, righteous, God-Fearing qualities of The Greatest President in Our History is over-the-top mockery, right? Say, did you hear about the two Chinese farmers, one of them says "That's it, I'm moving to Sinkiang" and the other says "Moving? But Chin-Chin, why?" and the first one says "Oh, I just hate this whole Fukin province." ----OEJ 16:26, 29 August 2006 (UTC)


Why does this suck

can someone please tell me why this page sucks. FIrst of all its not true and it doesnt mention that bush was reading to pre-schoolers with fool knowledge that 2 planes just hit the twin towers. Plus he acted the worst way with katrina. And he robbed iraq blind of oil. This isnt the man to praise this is the man to make fun of because hes a idiot and the terrorist of the united states. So do the world a favior and end this page to stop pissing off everyone since everyone knows bush is a idiot and anyone who doesnt is mentaly retarded

Why do you hate America? -- Rei 03:59, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
Why do you misinterprete everything? America is awesome. Buch sucks ass. Get it? I OWN God 23:49, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Gee, for a user on a parody wiki, you sure are taking things seriously... —Correspondent Hin Arash, PRAA Icons-flag-us [TALK] [KUN] (23:52, 28 September 2006 (UTC))
See, you don't deny it. You do hate America. Otherwise, you'd vote Republican. Lincoln was a Republican, you know. So was Jesus. Have you heard the good news about our Lord, Jesus Christ? -- Rei 04:04, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
(i realised when i read here that Rei is "taking the piss" not very american of you Rei)
I do deny it you retarded nazi the guy who made the atom bomb and use it was a democrat for fucks sake
Denying Jesus is the way to the lake of fire. Repent sinner! Love America, and love our glorious leader! -- Rei 18:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
How bout you just get your fucking head out of the bible and see reality that bush is retarded hes worst then hitler since he killed 665,000 people exept he didnt know he did witch is worst and im sure all those inocent people who were locked up andhad there balls zaped can agree with me
I hate to see a person so blinded by hate that they can't see the light. All it takes is faith in Christ, and you shall be saved; no more will the smoke of hellfire cloud your eyes from the truth! Speaking of Christ, back to the subject of George W. Bush. Hitler was an illegitimately elected, authoritarian, jingoistic warmongerer -- i.e., nothing at all like Bush. As for the war, sure, go ahead and cite those commie "studies" that make up numbers using "statistics". We all know that only a few thousand people died, essentially all terrorists, their sympathizers, and those killed by the freedom-hating terrorists (who don't represent the Iraqi people).
You don't seem to be aware of the accuracy of our weapons. They don't call them "smart bombs" just to appease the masses. We've *saved* 665,000 people from gruesome torture at the hands of Saddam and his al-Qaeda allies (sponsored by the ACLU). Soon, the country will convert to Christianity (missionary work has already begun), and then they'll *truly* be saved. And then, wow, won't *you* have egg on your face! Praise Jesus! -- Rei 22:42, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Holy shit your such dumbasses if iraq becomes christian there going to get invaded and destroyed 5 times over. Plus there are no such things as "commies studies" since there are no commies and if i was you i wouldnt be talking since commies beat you facists. We had no right geting into Saddams buisness but al-qaeda was a waste since there wining we havent made any progress on them and were loseing since we cant beat a guerilla war. Plus we didnt save 650,00 people we wasted that much and they were mostly american supporters. Plus hitler and bush are exactly parralel they are the same and this is a fact that cant be proven wrong since its not wrong. And enless the Iraqie people want to be war mongering satan lovers they would know not to convert to christianity
Sounds exactly like something a commie would say. Why do you love Stalin so much? He murdered millions. -- Rei 00:18, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
The fact that you hate freedom, America, and people in general is a fact that cannot be proven wrong, since it is not wrong. Q.E.D. Spang talk 01:27, 16 Nov 2006
Dude, If I can say something: Fuck Christianity! Iraq does not fuckin' want Christianity. Those 665,000 poeple are now protesting against us to get the hell out...plus, we're drawig the terrorists over there and drawing their bombings over to Iraqi hospitals. I don't care what the fuck your Bible says, no religion is salvation. Know why? 'Cause there's about 2000 different religions (Not literally, I just know there's a lot), past and present. And they all claim something different. How are we to know that Christianity is the way? Personally, I think Jesus was fucking insane ("Dude, look, I can make Wine outta water. I can fuckin' walk on water!" Bullshit.). Btw, according to Family Guy, God's been like Jiraiya from Naruto: Hitting on young girls while pouring beer into a levitating glass as a clever pick-up. You believe what you want, but seriously...Bush is the like the opposite of the Christian portrayal of God or Jesus or whoever. Damn... 63.227.55.121 21:31, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Jesus just cried when He read your post.
No that cry was from when satan stuck a pole up his ass
The people in Iraq aren't protesting because they want us out. They're protesting because there aren't enough of us there, keeping them safe and happy.  :) Hooray, America! Onward to glory for our great leader! -- Rei 20:54, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
What's the problem with kids today? In our day, we'd lie just to get into the army so we could do George's good work - which mostly involved cleaning up the messes left by Clinton and his regime. Damn commies. Today it's all "why are we at war" and "you making the world hate us". Maybe if they went to live in one of these freedom-hating countries for a while, they appreciate how good they have it and why everyone should be more live America! Spang talk 02:44, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

I dont why did you make a artical of our president thats stupid enough to make him look good

Well, he's not my president, but I wish he was. Some people just don't know what they've got 'til it's gone. Spang talk 00:47, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

yea like the mistake of not electing kerry. Millions of americans are regreting this. And trust me the LAST thing you want is a bush problem

"... the LAST thing you want is a bush problem". Funnily enough, my doctor said the same thing. Spang talk 01:03, 22 September 2006 (UTC)


Ok its obvious u guys are just makeing cheap attempts to be funny since noone can be as zero minded as you guys are acting

I was wondering who you had actualy addressed this too!--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 13:23, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
The idiots who think bush is acualy a good president

Once again, i'm here to save uncyclopedia from the retardedness that is Rei. Now, this may be hard for you to believe, but the entire amount of people killed in a war THAT HITLER STARTED was well over 25 million people. Whats that? Bush has killed more people in the Iraq war? Um....NO, YOU FUCKING IDIOT!

Exactly -- thank you, anonymous! I've been trying to tell people this, but they don't listen. Bush is not as bad as Hitler! I think it'd make an excellent campaign slogan: "George W. Bush: I Didn't Kill 25 Million People". No, seriously -- for one, it'd shut up those idiots who make the Hitler comparison, and for another, it'd imply that whoever he ran against very well *might* kill 25 million. Hippie morons like MoveOn.org would have you think that Bush *did* kill that many, or 650,000, or whatever their current made-up number is. Dear Lord, I cannot stand those people. -- Rei 18:24, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm guessing Rei is being sarcastic. That, or he watches FOX news. 76.84.12.144 22:56, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Guys Relax!!

This page is all about misinformation and lies! Hence it ends up portraying George Bush as a saint!! But the humour is too subtle compared to the other articles.

Yes, but as one wise one said on this very page, humor that must be explained is not good humor. Therefor, scrap it or make it funny 'cause Bush sucks ass. I OWN God 23:51, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
And you think a page that basically says "HA HA GEORGE BUSH IS STUPID AND SUCKS ASS!" is good humour? Spang talk 04:08, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
oh yea calling him a crusader is realy giveing us the impression that your realy saying "HA HA GEORGE BUSH IS STUPID AND SUCKS ASS!"
Its obvious this page was made for dark sarcasm but its not working so you guys can drop the act that you support bush.

This Page is NOT FUNNY it's just a Pro-Bush propoganda page

WTF is up with that? I thought the pages were supposed to be funny, not propoganda!?! So we can edit the Clinton page to our hearts content but the Bush page gets locked out after a few conservatives have their little rant?!? How about a page that makes fun of Bush's intelligence etc...

Clinton is an America-despising despot who kills enemies and is a sexual predator. I've heard rumors that he once strangled a baby. Bush, on the other hand, is an American hero, loved by all. You have your answer right there. Praise Jesus! -- Rei 01:31, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
yep Bush is loved by all with his 2% aproval rateings and the 2/3 of the world who say they hate him are acualy expressing there love for him and everyone hates clinton and how he helped the economy
2%? My poll numbers from http://fuzzylemur.blognet3.com/~loveitorleaveit26/archives/webpoll say 93%. Sounds a bit low, as everyone I know here at my munitions plant loves him, but you know, there are America-hating commies out there in places. -- Rei 19:40, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
93% what fucking facist comunist racist pro-white kind of sight is that i cant go there since it was shut down but oh well you can go and makeout with a blow up bush now that your sights member base went down 1 leaveing it a record 1 member witch happens to be you

...you DO get that there ARE sites on the internet that view Bush in this glowing fashion and that this therefore COULD be a parody of that glowing praise, right?--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:21, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Shh, you're ruining the fun.  ;) -- Someone 14:42, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
A bit too abstract for the general reader in my opinion. A lot of it is actually validation or praise, in between the links. It'll basically take a top-to-bottom rewrite by someone with comedy writing skills to stop an instant reversion by this page's watchers. In any event the page may say something about the current state of free speech in the U.S. if the GWB uncyclopedia page doesn't contain any overt jokes. - Diceman 16:14, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Do you think Spinal Tap is a documentary?--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 16:58, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
No. - Diceman 05:43, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

POST WHAT THIS PAGE SHOULD HAVE

I got an idea, since we can't do anything on the ACTUAL page because it's locked, lets just put that stuff right here!!!

There is no place for anti-Bush humor at Uncyclopedia.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 22:23, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Bush does not exist, he is only a figment of your own imagination

Things this page should have to make it better

humour

more cowbell

less british people

Remove/move the big yellow template at the top?

I think the "number of maimimngs" template looks a bit ugly at the top there, and it's a bit distracting. I think it should be moved down to the bottom or removed altogether, perhaps replaced with a comment warning in the page source. What say you? It would look something like this. Spang talk 06:40, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

As the original author of Template:Number of Bans I agree that it is pretty distracting bu thats the whole point whilst the amount of vandal activity by no means stopped when this was started to be used on pages (on Romania first bizarrely), it certainly slowed the tide significantly, therefore whilst in an ideal world we could ditch or move it does actually serve valuable a purpose.--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 09:40, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
While I certainly understand Elvis's point, I feel that the distraction from the page of having it there probably outweighs the benefit. How about we try taking it down for a week or two and see how things change? -- Rei 20:40, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Ok, let's try it without it for a week, and if vandalism greatly increases we can always put it back. Spang talk 02:56, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

OMG NOT FUNNY

WTF IS THIS ABOUT???? Nothing funny here. What did fox news do? Damn them. This would've been the funniest damn article ever made. I can't wait till Bush gets out of office. Then Fox will have no right to forbid people from editing. Or will they?

Let me guess. You watch that hippie, tree-hugging, terrorist-coddling, homosexuality-indoctrinating, god-hating, America-bashing, Saddam-worshiping, bear-friendly, commie-wannabee CNN, right? -- Rei 17:17, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Better then Fox whitch apperently only u watch
And you read that Vault Scarecrow-loving, Deforestating, 9/11 Knowing-But-Not-Acting, Homo-Killing, False Love-Loving, America-Glorifying, Religion-Forcing, Crack-Smoking, Wisdom-Wannabe Bible, right? 71.212.189.227 09:49, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

I've had a thought...

What will happen with this page if/when (god forbid) the ol' Texas Ranger retires from office? I may be a bit early on, but I like to think about such things early. Or maybe it doesn't need thinking about at all. Would it stay the same, but in the past tense, or would it refuse to admit that he's not president any more ("he's still the president of our hearts" type thing)? Who knows? Praise Bush! Spang talk 22:50, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Allah willing, Bush will remain President for eternity, and this page would never accept that he ever left office. That, I believe is the best choice in this matter.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 23:45, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
I concur. I think that this page should go into denial, and insist that reports of him leaving office are nasty rumors spread by those who hate America, and that there's a clause in the 22nd amendment that allows for longer terms "if the president does a truly remarkable job at keeping the country safe and free". During the campaign, we can cover any issues that come up with the Republican candidate as if it were in an ongoing primary, and treat the whole electon as indicating Bush's extreme popularity making it so that he doesn't have to bother to advertise or show up to debates. If we wanted to keep going, after the election, we could give him credit for anything good that happens with the next administration, referring to the next pres. as the "Speaker of the House".  :) -- Rei 16:25, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Well if god forbids he stays in office for all eternity we will have nothing to worry about since if he does everyone in the United states are going to kill themselves anyway if they found out

AAAAAAAAA!

I think the Picture of Pres. Bush/The Scream from AAAAAAAAA! should be placed in this article, with the words "George W. Bush, on flunking his first English class" under it.

That'd be more appropriate for that cruel parody, George Dubya Bush, which a bunch of brainwashed Democrats wrote to defame our glorious president. Now, if you don't mind, I need to return to my cave to do pennance for not campaigning hard enough to stop the party of Satan from taking over congress. -- Rei 21:07, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

This is comedic genius

Seriously. Such overblown praise where one expects juvenile slander is what makes this article hilarious. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 18:23, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

im still trying to figure out if above post is sarcastic

but while this article may not be hilarious, its nice to see something SUPPORTIVE. cant we make a funny supportive article?

This is a great page, funniest part though is all the idiots that don't get it :D. well done. 203.211.121.123 12:24, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Wow, thats real insightful of you, 203.211.121.123, that all the "idiots" that "didn't" "get it", you sure are a genious, where do you get it from? Ah, doesn't matter. Wait, wait, hang on, i see a problem...., yep, it's another case of RETARD, jeez, i gotta call the CDC. Honestly, the idiots that didn't get it? who the fuck would that be? anyone stupid enough not to get it must live in either australia or britain, because the 2 countries share similar levels of idiocy. of course, since the article was written by terrorists (see "british"), that must be the case.

Audio version of this page suggestion

Since this article was written in the deadpan style, it needs a deadpan type audio version of it. I think Ben Stein's voice or a voice like his should be used to hear the article. See a deadpan delivery is done in an emotionless and boring voice like Mr. Stein has, plus Mr. Stein often supports Bush and Republicans and talks about Economics and other stuff anyway. Mr. Stein was the Economics teacher in Ferris Bueller's Day Off and kept repeating "Bueller? Bueller? Bueller?" over and over again for those who happen to remember that bit. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 18:17, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Hey, if you know someone who can sound as boring as Stein, feel free  :) -- Rei 16:27, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

The President's stand on reproductive rights for women

I'll have you know that our current President is fully in support of the fair use provisions in our nation's copyright laws. He also believes that women are as equally capable of operating the Cannon copiers as men. The article should be unlocked so we can mention that factBooBooKitty 07:36, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

quote

Буш, ты не прав! (Bush, you not right)

~ Жириновсий about Bush

Bored in the Office?

  • Well aparently, if i'm not mistaen, after a very long, boring day in office, you don't know what to do for fun. Perosonally I like to draw, or play Guildwars. Well, in Bush's case, he likes to eat little innocent Kittens
  • Here's thje proooof. Click to enlarge.
BushEatsKittens

Interwiki

Please, add cs:George W. Bush

Use this to make fun of Bush supporters

Tv_sesame_street_national_association_of_w_lovers.jpg

Add it:George W. Bush

Great article

But some of the reactions on this talk page are feeding my worst fears :-( ... Al-Pita 08:11, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry, your intentions may have been noble, but this article is crap! you forget that 90% of the world is made up of morons and as a result many will believe what you say about Bush. No one could despise the man more than i, but the entire idea behind this article is so bad (and the article itself is so boring) that i feel obliged to add this comment.

So, what if those people, whom you in your infinite wisdom call morons, believe this article? Will it do more damage than, say, Fox News? Don't take it all too seriously. And if you want easy, in-your-face, THE GUY IS A FAG-type humour, just click "Random Page" to the left. Al-Pita 16:44, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

NPOV style with SPOV content

... is what I like most about many parts of this article. I didn't see it that way until I removed the "his excellency" part at the beginning — you've got to take them slow, I feel. Otherwise the rest gets filtered through a lens that's already going "Hmmph, reverse exaggeration". This way instead, however, any self-respecting reader ought to gradually catch on even if they somehow aren't aware of what Uncyclopedia is. In general, the fewer subjective terms used ("Greatest President Ever!") and the more Wikipedia/"fact"-sounding ("elected in a landslide," "following voiced WMD threats by Saddam"), the better. Hence the use of a regular main photo and not a photoshopped "godly" one — the point should be to sound like an alternate history in which Bush really is the greatest president, not some crazed, so-good-it's-bad propaganda for the man.

I guess what I'm saying is that I'm seeing too much of a dichotomy in the above discussion over whether the article ought to swing all one way or the other, that the absence of "Hooray Bush LOL!" invariably means the presence of "Bush Sucks LOL!" In reality, the approach should be subtle either way, while still sticking to some degree of absurdity (like the vacting Texas Governorship idea). And the advantage of having a president this awful is that you hardly have to exaggerate the rhetoric in his favor ("You're a liberal terrorist!"), only the facts ("Iraq is headed to an unprecedented recovery..."). Otherwise, this becomes too much a culture war (that Bush is bad merely because he's a Republican) and not enough about actual, plain old bullshit on the part of various parties. Does that make sense? — Lenoxus 02:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

The final article is somewhat of a compromise joke between the "Bush rocks, LOL!" and "Bush sucks, LOL!" crowds. As you said, it's pretty clear to anyone with the internet that Bush is probably not the best President we've ever had (to understate it), but the "BUSH IS A FAG! ROFLMAO!" crowd is so vocal, we has to cater to the a little bit, as we made this article, since the pro-Bush content was being misunderstood and often outright rejected. There are a lot of people (as this talk page shows) who won't even stomach a satirical pro-Bush-propaganda article, so this was what we came up with. I think in the end, it's a happy enough medium, though I would have preferred the more subtle approach myself.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 16:29, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! I HAVE HAD IT WITH THESE MOTHERFUCKING RIDICULOUSLY LONG SUBHEADINGS ON THIS MOTHERFUCKING TALK PAGE! IT'S FUCKING OBNOXIOUS! LEARN HOW TO POST ON MOTHERFUCKING TALK PAGES! DRINK UP, BITCH!

--GAMESPOT=666 04:06, 6 February 2007 (UTC) SAMUEL L JACKSON

Iraq War section to a giant comma?

What do you think about changing the Iraq War section to a giant comma? To match George's words.

That's a hilarious notion. Of course, I wouldn't want to lose what we already have. Perhaps create a postwar Iraq section, and have that be the comma? We could merge the existing Iraq stuff into the War on Terror part. -- Rei 23:43, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
I don't get it. If it's based on a quote, is it one everyone will know? Without knowing why it's there, it distracts from the intended tone a bit. A lot. A lot lot. Spang talk 00:22, 9 Feb 2007
You never heard about this? Bush stated that the Iraq war will be viewed as "just a comma" in the history books when all is said and done. His remarks are not only insulting, but they're believed to be a kind of "code" for the religious right [1] - a reference to "Never place a period where God has placed a comma." -- Rei 00:35, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
As I said, it's a large change for a small joke. I asked on irc and people didn't get it. Perhaps the quote isn't as well known as you thought? I still think it detracts from the tone too much to stay in. Spang talk 01:06, 9 Feb 2007

Um, I'm pretty familiar with a lot of folks from the religious right and the cute things they come up with, and I've never heard of that before. Also, what Spang said, it comes across as an inside joke. (Yes, you can read "asked Brad" when he said, "asked people in IRC;" it's allowed, though there were others in there that didn't get it, as well).--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 02:07, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

No worries, then. I'll use the comma in an Iraq War-related article. I thought this quote was more well known than it apparently was. -- Rei 03:43, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
I made a 2003 Invasion of Iraq article (an opposite perspective version of Operation Iraqi Freedom), and used the comma in it, so if someone wants to take the comma out of this, feel free. -- Rei 16:30, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Oh, and in case you're curious to see uses of the phrase:
  • It's a symbol of the United Church of Christ. Check out the pic of over four hundred people forming a human comma[2]
  • A reverend's website[3]
  • A religious song[4]
  • A church bulletin[5]
  • A covenantweb sermon[6]
  • A grief intervention forum[7]
  • A Christian college[8]
(etc). Depending on the wording you use (never vs. don't, put vs place, etc), you'll get varying numbers of hits. It's not an *exceedingly* common fundie phrase, but it is a well-travelled fundie phrase. It means, basically, "don't give up; trust in God." -- Rei 16:30, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Nice to see something supportive of our president, funny or not


I don't find the comma funny. Knowing what is meant does not make it funnier, and making the comma very big doesn't make it funny either. Things are rarely more funny just because they're big. The section also doesn't fit with the rest of the article so I would remove the whole thing. Sometimes things only seem funny at first. Al-Pita 13:25, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
If you haven't been paying attention to the history, I recommend that you do. I added it in on the recommendation of another user. When I found out that others weren't getting it, I stated that people were free to remove it. Seing that nobody had, I shrunk it down, deciding that this would be better than leaving it as big as it was.
In short: Feel free to shrink it further or remove it, but please don't act like A) people have been making it bigger, or B) people are opposing its removal. -- Rei 16:24, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


I think this is a very funny article. Especially the introduction.

My Pet Goat

On Hikipedia, the cause and effect are presented such that reading My Pet Goat caused GWB to attack Afghanistan and Iraq. --130.233.28.197 04:23, 3 March 2007 (UTC)


Chimp

Please remove that smiling face with that of a chimp.

That face disgusts me at the very sight of it.

What will we do next year?

When You-know-who leaves the throne, who are we going to call the biggest asshole in history? A few years from now, most people will probably forget how much of a bastard he was (I hope not, though). P.S. I know this will inevitably get me banned forever, but I will rip my guts out before I actually begin thinking he isn't a retard.The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wondernerd2 (talk • contribs)

Why would you get banned for calling him an asshole? This is Uncyclopedia! We call everyone "asshole". Hell, I'm an asshole and a bastard. An asstard, if you will. Realize, however that cerebral wit is a far more effective method of verbal castration than pottymouth. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:07, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, just my paranoia acting up. But seriously, what will we do when Bush finally leaves? For all we know, someone even stupider could come and replace him.The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wondernerd2 (talk • contribs)

Don't say that. That's bad luck.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 13:42, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Say what? "For all we know, someone even stupider could come and replace him."? I can't see how "For all we know, someone even stupider could come and replace him." would be bad luck and Googling "For all we know, someone even stupider could come and replace him." doesn't come up with much. How is saying "For all we know, someone even stup(/me shot by brad)...--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:53, 6 March 2007 (UTC)


An Indian fortune teller told me that George Bush has only two possible futures. The first is that he volunteers to become Ambassador to Iraq for the next ten years. His family of course goes with him and together they spend the next ten years in the Green Zone. (His brother Jed runs a consolate in Southern Iraq.) The second possibility is that George W. Bush goes to jail for his crimes and is repeated gangraped by a group of prison thugs known as Tiny's Boys. Eventually he submits to the gang and is given the nickname 'Ladyboy Bush' Whether either of these prove to be true I can not say but it sure sounded interesting when told to me by a street fortune teller in Bombay.

George Bush had a brother named Robin.

You probably have never heard of Robin Bush. Mewtwowimmer 18:03, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Bush has the mental age of a 2 year old

For you see he cannot talk properly; he says things like "Iriqland","Iranistan" and "My fellow Americanianas of America" I may be 13 but ,excuse my french, he's a twat!

Although this make good reading in ICT

How dare you talk about our Commander in Chief that way! George W. Bush is a great man. He read 104 books last year[9]. This means that he's highly intelligent, and really, quite the scholar. If the scientific community would actually listen to what he has to say, we wouldn't have this stupid global warming myth trying to scare our children.

Bush maybe a scholar. But YOU definitely aren't. 70.110.252.44 20:43, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Support our troops. -- Rei 22:54, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, all those books were all probably "How to be President, for Dummies," but in some language he can't understand. And about that "stupid global warming myth," it's not a myth at all. --Image-SIG-P228 Captain Yankee Talk Contribs CLICK HERE!!! Image-SIG-P228 23:35, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
No, he mostly reads about other presidents. He's a lot like FDR, you know -- resurrecting the economy, helping the poor, defending America.
Please don't tell me you've bought into this whole "Global Warming" conspiracy. It's just a dumb socialist push to try and weaken the American economy. -- Rei 05:16, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
First of all, I really don't want to turn this talkpage into a big global warming debate. But, you might want to read this and this.-- Image-SIG-P228 Captain Yankee Talk Contribs CLICK HERE!!! Image-SIG-P228 14:43, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Oh yeah, like "Wikipedia" and "Mathaba.net" are the most unbiased sources. You should read what the scientists over at this site have to say. I can't believe how many people fell for this global warming nonsense.
Anyways, back on topic. Bush reads, like his role model FDR, and is one of the smartest presidents we've ever had. Support our troops. -- Rei 23:00, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
So let me get this straight, Rei: I say I'm a Christian, and you'll run with guns blazing towards whoever I say is the enemy? Stop being such a stupid Zionist pawn FOR a Zionist pawn. Bush gets the job well done, alright: he reaches out to you and me, reciting all he "stands for" and what this war "is about" - in simple, easy to follow good ol' boy lingo - and you believe him. Our American President is nothing more than what the Queen is to England: a spiritual leader, a symbol of the people, someone who the people will follow. That is Bush's purpose to the core: when such a leader is indebted to others, he becomes a tool to get people like you to support otherwise unpopular causes. Forget the coffers: let Israel fight its own fucking war and lets tighten the border so we don't have to worry about terrorists running around getting flight school licenses and such in the first place. Idiots!--Battywat444 05:12, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
I don't know what the Zionists have to do with anything, but thank God for them -- otherwise, the Arabs would run amok in the Middle East more than they do now -- blowing stuff up, killing people, praying to their silly moon god, etc. Only the return of God's people to Zion can bring about Christ's return -- and you know, the generation which witnesses the return (the current generation) is to witness the end times. No one can say specifically *when* the end will be, but we know it will be soon. And I, for one, welcome our savior, the Lord, Jesus Christ. Do YOU? What do you plan to tell Him on Judgement Day? I'll bet you anything that *Bush* knows what he plans to say -- he's a good Christian!
Support our troops. -- Rei 15:49, 5 July 2007 (UTC)


Well, "Zionist" is a recycled term that historically meant one supportive of establishing a homeland for Jews in Israel, I'm sure you knew that. Now it is used to describe the politics for or of the STATE of Israel, which, by the way, may or may not be for the Jewish people. I urge you to be aware of the difference. Why? Because if this is a war for a sovereign state that benefits a sovereign state, I'm sure the leaders of this sovereign state that happens to call itself Israel don't mind you thinking that it is also for a Christian cause, especially if this means American sons will be shedding their blood to help them. The truth is, Christians make good lapdogs and unfortunately, there is enough evil in the world that people would and have used this to their own benefit.
Now from a Christian point of view, as far as the end of times is concerned, there are signs and symbols today which reflect prophesies, you are right in this respect. However, what if these signs and symbols continue for the next three hundred years? You're putting an awful lot of stock in an interpretation of events that relies on this - the war of the here and now - not just being about Israel and its neighbors, but part of the Christian prophesy you are looking for. Having faith and following His teachings ins one thing, steering political policy to to try and fulfil prophesies yourself is another. In fact, thats just nuts.--Battywat444 12:43, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
It is not the Christians who are being used. It is the Muslims who are doing the bidding of the fallen angel under the guise of some cheaply disguised moon god "Allah" that are being used. The Jews fall into two camps -- those who will convert and those who will not. It's all part of God's plan. It's not us who are being used, but they -- and it's not "being used" by the leaders of the Earth, but of Heaven and Hell. And we have been told that the generation shall not perish from the Earth between when the state of Israel is restored and Christ's second coming. It doesn't matter what we do -- war or peace, pollution or environmentalism, conservation or waste -- God's plan cannot be ignored or changed. So, unless you're expecting some miraculous healthcare improvements that let the current generation live for hundreds of years, the end is very soon. And, to top it all off, we have a born-again Christian in the White House who understands, accepts, and truly believes all of this -- a real believer in the truth of our Lord's word. Praise Jesus! -- Rei 16:55, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Un-Protect this page

Ummm, why exactly is this page protected? And what gives Rei the power to be the one who decides what goes on here? I believe the purpose of this website is to be for anyone to add stuff to it, BS or otherwise as long as its funny. This shouldn't be your little personal playground.

Go ahead. Put back in whatever you want. I won't touch it. There are 4 or 5 other people who will also revert article-ruining content. -- Rei 17:27, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
The power for Rei to be the one who decides what goes on here was vested in him by god himself. True story. Spang talk 07:54, 07 Jun 2007
Vote Republican long enough, and that sort of thing happens. Praise Jesus! -- Rei 02:54, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Fuck you and the horse that you rode in on, Rei.

Christ cries when He hears talk like that. Wash your mouth out and go to church. -- Rei 18:24, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Christ cries everytime you get naked rei

George HDDVD Bush

THat article needs to be made and added to the Bush family template

Hate Bush?

Check out the Get Bush In Jail Link.--Sir Manforman CUN 15:15, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Retards; I have one super-important thing to say

I AM CANADIAN so I cant get in trouble for making fun of Bush:P:P haha. Anyway you scared pansies afraid to write anything about Bush; what do you think he's gonna do? Track down your ip adress and arrest you? Do you seriously think George W Bush comes on Uncyclopedia he's probably never even heard of it he's like 50 he doesnt know anything about computers, let alone technology.

Addressing everyone reading this talk page is a great way to make friends on this site. Also, please note that Nobody Cares. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:42, August 16, 2007

The SmokyDoggg Has reviewed this article, and he has this to say

The SmokyDoggg, bringer of all things vile and wicked to the honorable Uncyclopedia (and contributor to the George Dubya Bush page), has personally reviewed this article and has found that it's actually pretty funny. You people who complain have to understand that this isn't going to be smack-you-in-your-face "huh huh, Bush screws donkeys" funny. This article is more of an aquired taste, witty funny. I have appreciation for both, even though the former is my forte (which is why I contribute to the Dubya article). Kudos to the writers. --Smokydoggg 03:05, 10 August 2007 (UTC) BTW I wish Bush would read this, he's actually dumb enough to think this was all written seriously to praise him.

Not as fun as it should be...

There is some subtle humour on some places, but it's far from as funny as it could be. That some retards choose this monkey as president according to the view held in the article, doesn't really make it funny. Delete the George W. Bush page and replace it with the Dubya page, which is a lot more fun.

Either that, or don't allow any dingbats to fuck around by reverting all funny comments that people make to this page. Unless, of course, you allow reverting reverted changes !! That could be a good idea.


This is why the article is funny, because it puts George Bush in such a Good Light, if you dont like this page just stay over at the Dubya article, a article designed especially for liberals such as yourself, the dubya page seems to focus just on Bush's stupidity(and yes he is one stupid bastard), while this article is more satirical in nature, so dont try to whine about this article just because your a crazy lib, you dont have to look at it Mr.ZinkyWinks 08:43, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Does George Bush love me too?

To me this article does not give a true sense of how good the Master Overlord really is. I mean, he's a great guy and all, but how do I know he loves me too? I propose this text to be inserted into the article immediately: George Bush loves YOU too! Every night he flies all around the world, dropping a present down every child's chimney, which makes him 365 times better than Santa Claus himself. 80.6.6.193 06:48, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

SEX!!-sorry, but how else am I supposed to compete with all this crap?

Okay...this is really a mouthful. Everyone calm down. I knew this was going to be like this because all the people who like Bush think it's real and all the people who don't think it's supposed to be real. Look, It's fake. If you're one of the three people who still believe that sonofsomethingundesirable, you should probably go tune in for Spongebob right about now. It's funny, I promise you, but in the end it could be funnier. DO NOT GO RIGHT AHEAD AND CHANGE THE WHOLE THING TO SOMETHING YOU THINK IS FUNNY!! Here's the thing, if you weren't smart enough to laugh after every sentence in this article that you think lied, don't change it. If you live in Britian, love John Lennon's lyrics, and don't eat everything FOX news spoon feeds you, think of something funny and write it down where it makes sense to add something. --76.226.125.25 02:22, 27 October 2007 (UTC)Justadudewhodoesntwanttoseethiswholepageruined

Why is the article locked?

Why is the article locked? The second sentence of the very first paragraph misspells winning as "wining". Is GWB self-editing his own article or something?--YourMotherHasMyUnderwear 23:15, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

The page is locked, but only to anonymous IPs. Maybe try to make sure that you were logged in? I fixed the error, btw. I can't believe nobody saw it! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:14, Oct 28
Well I'm logged in as you can see from my sig, and I have no edit tab on the article page. Is there a rule against noobs?--YourMotherHasMyUnderwear 02:44, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
I don't think so... is there a tab that says "view source"? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:49, Oct 28
Yes. When I view it, it says "This page has been locked to prevent editing." on the top of the page.YourMotherHasMyUnderwear 03:03, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Hmm, that IS odd. Maybe try Forum:Help? Perhaps someone there will have an answer. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:10, Oct 28

If you joined in the last 3 days (I think that's the limit), you can't edit semi-protected pages. (This is to stop some IPs from making a username to edit and then never returning).--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 12:28, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Ya, I got it. Well, now that I have the keys, I have some suggestions. The article is well written but not particularly funny. Particularly the opening bit, which I think should be less bush's exact platform, and maybe more bush-ism. I'm gonna try something out, let's see if I can start a revert war. I think my edit is a lot more funny than taking his campaign speeches and asserting they're true. That's too real to be funny. Yes, I realize that the links are clever, but that's not funny if the writing is flat.--YourMotherHasMyUnderwear 04:59, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Italic intro

In the italicized introductory paragraph, conspiracy ought to be replaced with conspiracy. Mathguy112358 05:55, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Sure, I'll do it. Just so you know, you'll be able to edit this in 4 days. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 05:58, Nov 18


This article lacks cocks and internet memes

Can I get a rickroll?!?! -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 08:45, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Grammar

In the 'war on terror' section: "Bush ability to remain calm under fire (demonstrated by reading a book..." should be: "Bush's ability to remain calm under fire (demonstrated by reading a book..." 212.120.248.128 22:26, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

GRAMMAR??? I ain't never done heard of it. Sounds like LIBERAL propaganda!! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:29, Dec 10

That's satire

Domokunyellownbackground SHUT THE FUCK UP ALREADY!
We are extremely aware of the article's praising of the American president. We are currently taking steps to remedy this.

Why? i quote wikipedia's article on satire: "A very common, almost defining feature of satire is a strong vein of irony or sarcasm," Does anyone else agree? 212.120.248.128 22:23, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Stephen Colbert?

I noticed that there is some qualities on this article that might be considered something that would be on the Colbert Report. Does anyone think that someone could write something about Stephen Colbert? Maybe even a quote? I am not funny, but maybe you could come up with something.

“I always knew he was god, I was waiting for when he was going to reveal it.”
~ Mr. Stephen Colbert on George W. Bush is God
“I like this guy, he reminds me of someone.”
~ George W. Bush on George W. Bush

Everything funny was DELETED

Why is this page so serious? This is meant to be a funny site. I severaly dislike Bush. That's why I was hoping ths page would go over the top in humor as all the other ones. But this page was so serious that I thought I had been redirected to Wikipedia. You guys don't have to take this page so seriously. Loosen up. Gawd. Also, whoever said that Jesus was a Republican is an idiot.

See above. While you're there, get a sense of humor. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:44, Jan 8
I ate all the humor. Langolier 18:37, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
OM NOM NOM. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 19:05, Feb 5
Personal tools
projects