From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Hmmm! Not sure about Mowgli's intent in adding the "white trash" comment and the template inviting discussion, but no actual discussion. ----OEJ 19:45, 27 May 2007 (UTC) (Note: Mowgli and I discussed the article on his talk page. As usual, I probably did not do such a good job of making the intent of the article clear...) ----OEJ 23:55, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

I really liked this article. "Good thing I had my bicycle helmet." Mightywayne 13:17, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

This one could do good with a sound file. Just the way it's written, it seems like one would be good. I kinda imagine the speaker being like Stephen Colbert, but British, for some reason or other.P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 15:23, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

edit Brilliant

Wow, this article is brilliant, and I also thank whoever wrote it for writing it. It sure made this Indian's day.

--Maharaja Hdgcfcf | Icons-flag-in | User Page | Talk | Go Kill Yourself 19:32, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

edit Voice recording

It'd be pretty cool to have this recorded on a low-quality mp3 recorder, with accent and ambient effects. So next time you've got diarrhea, grab a microphone real quick! --Dandin1 00:33, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

edit Format mess

The page doesn't look right. It looks like crap. Did someone forget to close an HTML tag? I'd fix it, but I don't want to mess up the page even further. --General Insineratehymn 07:45, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

I think that's happened on all featured pages, that big "Featured" stamp is eating babies. --Dandin1 18:23, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

edit From Pee

edit Ganges

I wrote this article with a specific goal in mind, and it may be that I have failed to come even reasonably close to attaining that goal. I need some help understanding what other people see in this piece. Thanks in advance, ----OEJ 14:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

I'll just go with my interpretation of the article. Even if I have interpreted this wrong in any way, I still think this article is excellent. I don't think it needs any improvement.
Humour: 10 A great mixture of intelligent and obvious humour in this one. I laughed a few times, which is good, because I don't laugh very often.
Concept: 10 I just love how this article parodies the Western World's views on developing countries. I think you have done a great job in this respect.
Prose and formatting: 10 Pretty much perfect.
Images: 9 Great captions improve the images here.
Miscellaneous: 8 I guess the only reason why I feel I have to mark it down here is that I get the feeling that if people don't understand the point of the article quickly, they will not read the whole thing, especially since it is quite long. Hopefully this shouldn't be too much of a problem, as the first few paragraphs give the readers a good idea of the point of the article.
Final Score: 47 *Cs1987 wanders off to the ol' VFH...
Reviewer: Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 16:01, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the review, Cs1987. You pretty much got the point of the piece, which is a nice thing for a typist to read. I appreciate your comments; just getting a laugh out of somebody is great. ----OEJ 01:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Personal tools