Talk:Fat Albert

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fat Albert article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that.
For a listing of unused images related to this topic, please see the image subpage.

Article policies
Bloink1 solid
This article was nominated for deletion on May 15, 2007.
The result of the discussion was Keep.

edit Unintentional irony

On the "liposuction" rewrite. Hehehe. -- herr doktor needsAbolt Rocket [scream!] 20:56, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes, very good. I wish I could've left that template there, but that would cause someone else to write a Fat Albert article.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:04, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

edit Rewrite?

Eh, that's okay. I only made the page so there would be something for all the links to Fat Albert. I was just waiting for someone to rewrite it, and I'm glad it was. I'm just surprised it lasted as long as it did! --The Llama Llover!!! 17:45, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

edit From Pee Review

edit Fat Albert

Rewrite for a crappy article. As per request. Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:42, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Humour: 8 The humor is funny. I just wish it was a little longer and more complex (maybe going into the characters themselves in sub-categories). A little truthful rambling may also help.
Concept: 10 I'm glad that somebody commented on this. I've always liked Fat Albert, but it can be just like a lot of low-budget cartoons of that time: odd and confusing. The article itself reminds me of an episode of Family Guy where Brian says to Stewie, "You know that little tub where you take your baths? They've done it there, too."
Prose and formatting: 9 Only one or two run-on sentences. Other than that, it's well-structured.
Images: 10 I don't think you can EVER go wrong with images of Fat Albert, especially with the template at the top of the page. The Easter Bunny and Marijuana references are also good.
Miscellaneous: 8 sure what to put here, either.
Final Score: 45 I think this is a great rewrite, espeically after what I read of the previous version. The images are great, and the idea (especially considering the cartoon's message) works well. Again, the only thing I could suggest is to make it a little longer and, perhaps, a bit more complex. Try to shatter any of the remaining "confusion" surrounding the show; maybe go after the characters ("You know WHY Mushmouth spoke like that?" or the sort). Great job!
Reviewer: --Mr.Vib 00:40, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Personal tools