From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 20:44, February 18, 2013 by (talk)

Jump to: navigation, search

This article is not funny in the slightest. My edit here: was not vandalism. I think it made the article a lot better, and the reversion to a previous version was uncalled for.


--RiNSpy 12:35, October 1, 2009 (UTC)

This article should be removed ASAP

Somebody mention Dieter! 06:48, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

This artice needs a complete rewrite. It's totally biased and not funny.

This article has some potential, but, yes, has some kind of edge that I can't put my finger on. It has its moments, but is very confused. Whoever wrote it has a cursory understanding of existentialism, which may be part of the reason that it is poorly done.

Personal tools