From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

This article is not funny in the slightest. My edit here: was not vandalism. I think it made the article a lot better, and the reversion to a previous version was uncalled for.


--RiNSpy 12:35, October 1, 2009 (UTC)

This article should be removed ASAP

Somebody mention Dieter! 06:48, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

This artice needs a complete rewrite. It's totally biased and not funny.

This article has some potential, but, yes, has some kind of edge that I can't put my finger on. It has its moments, but is very confused. Whoever wrote it has a cursory understanding of existentialism, which may be part of the reason that it is poorly done.

It might be more funny if it actually described existentialism at all, but nothing in the article is actually relevant to existentialism.

Personal tools