Talk:Evolution

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

Jump to: navigation, search

Can't we just mirror http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution ?? It's much funnier than anything else anyone has come up with and we don't even have to do any work. 65.14.70.98 22:33, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

This page is a big freakin' mess. --Mosquitopsu 06:07, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Yeah it's a mess, but that was the funniest thing I've seen for days.

Initially, I was going to say that 65.14.70.98 may be right, but we should at least try. But then I looked at the conservapedia page, which I hadn't done in a while, and discovered that they had added an image. And I sure hope they don't remove it, cause it made me fall off my chair! --69.91.95.139 19:04, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Aw, shit. --69.91.95.139 14:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Old caption for Darwin pic

...was much mo' better, in my 'pinion. --Myronic 00:20, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Very much so, I agree with you on that. --Orion Blastar 19:35, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Who removed the Michaelangello "penis evolution" image? Was it too "dirty"? That was funny as hell. Please put it back.

I'll put it back --Uncle J 14:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The page is locked

Ah shucks, and I wanted to add in a reference to Piltdown man who was actually taught existed in public schools. Those rotten creationists claim he did not exist, but the evolutionists know better. Piltdown man does exist, and still does. Many liberal professors are Piltdown men and they teach evolution, political science, social sciences, philosophy, and while not as evolved as others, do manage to reach tenure and write anti-USA articles like Ward Churchill does. Please help stop the oppression of the Piltdown men by those creationists. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 02:22, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Right. I'll take up your case as soon as I can understand what thee oust saying, infidel! Beezwax 18:42, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Locked

There's a bunch of close-minded bigots controlling this article. Unlock it so everyone can edit, dickweeds! Beezwax 02:57, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Something to add...

I wanted to add a template to this page, in honor of the controversy surrounding evolution:

BLASPHEMY!!!

God hath declared ye article BLASPHEMOUS!!!.
It shall be deleted and it's author shall be smitten immediately. Thus spaketh the Lord.

Do something about ye problem or else we shall be forced to bring out...the comfy chair! Duh-duh-duh!

But oh, poo, it's locked! Radioactive afikomen 05:28, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] omfg

WHAT DOES EVOLUTION AND GLOBAL WARMING HAVE TO DO WITH RELIGION??

I don't know about global warming, but the idea of evolution is blasphemous to some because according to Christian faith, their god created all animals. According to evolution, they were made like that because of evolution. Sublimeone 04:24, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Lol your language, your blasphemous language is all the more discrediting to you. No one in their right mind is going to listen. 4.158.192.134 03:55, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm a evolution-believing Christian, and I believe this article is fine the way it's going. It's poking fun at the stereotypical Christian, which I love to do as well. Most people know they're not related, but it's a comedic article not Wikipedia. --Kermit4prez 02:19, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Advent of the ladle!

Refer to the article on the ladle, that's where the truth will be made known!

[edit] omg its not funny anymore

Even though I'm a pure atheist and evolutionists, I liked how there was a swimsuit lady that looked like a monkey, it made me laugh my ass off. omfg I bet a fucking nerd came and edited this page. As I said, I am athiest and I have no interest in religion, but I am also secular so I like to get a few laughs or two from amaterialistic (or should i say creationistic) skeptics. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Storkian (talk • contribs)

No. ~Sir Rangeley Image:Icons-flag-us.png GUN WotM UotM EGA +S (talk) 21:49, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
No way he's an atheist. Only religious people have grammar that bad. --CUN RA Talk to me _ 01:12, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Believe it, sucker. As you can see, I am a religious man (I am I am) and I have good grammar. You atheist suckers all have the bad grammar. This page is now simply hilarious. The other one was just another atheist tyrade against religion. You just have no sense of humour! 4.158.192.134 03:53, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
So? the current one is a attack by faith against reason. Is there much of a difference?

Congratulations on defining reason. --38.116.200.49 17:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

What the hell happened to this page? It used to be one of the funniest articles on here and now it looks like it was written by one of those angry 13-year old creationists. Revert back to the old, actually funny article please. The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.100.55.152 (talk • contribs)

Naturally, an uncyclopedia article on evolution will be making fun of evolution, just like an uncyclopedia article on creation will be making fun of creation, but that doesn't get past people still prefering that this article look like it was written by an angry 13-year old evolutionist instead. --38.116.200.49 15:51, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

It was already making fun of evolution, it's just not as funny. I <str>worship satan</str> believe in evolution but atheists do have a sense of humour. Grrrrr. Revert this sorry shit back to it's demented contradictory old self that was the first article on uncyclopedia I ever saw, it would mean a lot to me.math ~ |DoS|Did|Yak|

A long while back this article used to portray evolution as an ignorant religious belief and creationism as a scientifically established fact, I loved that angle. Why was that changed? Just Some Random Idiot 22:35, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

[edit] GOD HATES EVOLUTION

GET THIS SHIT OFF OF HERE. STOP MONOPOLIZING EVERY STINKING PAGE WITH PARODIES OF CHRISTIANTIY. YOU'RE NOT FUNNY, YOU'RE STUPID AS HECK. NO ONE IS LAUGHING. NOW GET IT THE HELL OFF!!!!!!

Look, you're motherfucking bitch, I am the one that should be annoyed with this, not you. We atheists are more parodied in Uncyclopedia than you christians, so you have no reason of annoying us all - Falconfly
No, no, no, I think he makes some good points.   BAN MAGNET! <18:50, 13 Jul 2008>
Honestly, he (or she?) must be mad. I understand the high number of christians around here, but this is a parody site, not Conservapedia. Everyone and everything is parodied - the guy that posted before you
Oh NOOOO! We've been darned to HECK! - The Rat

[edit] Evolution according to Aristotle and Plato

First there was a Greek gay (ups Plato, you man guy), Afterwards the amoeba evolved, Than the Greek g.y sad “Let it be fruitful and multiply by the same sexual mechanism that I am using – Homogamy”

Personal tools
projects