Talk:Euronintendo

		This article was nominated for deletion on March 14, 2006. The result of the discussion was Delete.

		This article was nominated for deletion on August 22, 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep.

		This article was nominated for deletion on January 5, 2008. The result of the discussion was Keep.

		This article was nominated for deletion on February 8, 2008. The result of the discussion was Keep.

		This article was nominated for deletion on June 7th 2012. The result of the discussion was Keep.

This article was nominated for deletion on a regular basis. The result of the discussion was Hilarity.

Comments

I liked it better the first time, when it was called euroipods (video game). Maybe I'm just mad because Nintendorulez was obviously right in vandalizing euroipods. I mean, that guy should be made an admin if he's not one already. Nintendorulez is not a nooblet, don't pwn him. --207.200.116.5 21:07, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I think I should pwn you. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 21:29, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Whoah, whoah, whoah. I didn't vandalize, I simply was involved in a minor edit war over two templates. And got banned over it. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 17:32, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

I feel compelled to point out that I have moral qualms with this page. I am not going to do anything, but I feel I should at least point that out and let you do with it what you will. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 22:13, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• Something tell me that 207.200.116.5 might be Nintendorulez..   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 22:21, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Nope, I'm the guy who wrote the "go fuck yourself" reply on Talk:Euroipods that Rcmurphy thought was so funny. Really, more than half the people on this site hate euroipods and took Nintendorulez's side in the flame war, so I could've been anyone. I thought Savethemooses was on his side too, or at least that's what it looked like in the fight picture. --207.200.116.5 23:28, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)

THSI ARTICLE IS NOT FUNNY--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 23:29, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)

IM RIGHT SO EVERYONE CAN SOD OFF AND I SHOULD EB ADMIN BECAUSE THEN ID NEVER BAN ANYONE FOR DOING STUPID THINGS LIKE I DO, WIAT DID I JSUT SAY THAT.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 23:40, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)

HEY I LUAGHED OUT LUOD - David Gerard 00:21, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)

This article is not needed.

It dosen't have anything to do with Euroipods, somone who is more on top of things should elect it for deletion.--MrJimmy Journal talk 05:07, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I love this article. A funny and clever way to call readers's attention.--Rataube 22:48, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)

To borrow a term commonly used by admins when huffing articles, I would call this slandanity. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 19:52, 30 January 2006 (UTC)