Talk:Donovan

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 04:48, August 27, 2010 by MadMax (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

You know this isn't funny at all, right. Of all the things that you were expecting to be not stupid and start the page off with a bang, we got it for 4 or 5 sentences at the end. This sucks. It could be so much better.

edit Confused?

I have all the love and support for Donovan, but i'm finding it difficult to conclude whether this article is infact a mickey take. Either that or the page has been written by an avid fan of Mr Donovan. The content just seemed less clear and more directed as lifting Donovan up as a semi christ figure. He was donovan, not a mozart, he had visionary tactics to the creation of his music with the sounds etc, but as a guitarist i know that his chord progressions are simplistic. Perhaps as has been said this was intended, but i still feel this article colours Donovan too vividly.

Hmm... Well, it may be somewhat random. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:00, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

edit Fix'd

I made it a little less "DONOVAN IS NUMBOR ONE!!!!11!!one". Still needs some serious clean-up, though.

edit = Poo Poo

Yay

Personal tools
projects