Talk:Don't Read This Article

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 21:13, April 17, 2007 by Kelpan (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Don't mess with the bread

edit From Pee Review

I rewrote this one completely (or just about) and take full blame for the duck thing. Funny or just stupid? --Kelpan 23:14, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Humour: 5 I smiled a lot (not from the ducks). I chuckled once or twice.
Concept: 8 Metahumor and self-reference, two good things.
Prose and formatting: 5 Unpolished. A more mock serious tone would do this article good, in my opinion.
Images: 5 That big one at the bottom needs help. Way too cumbersome.
Miscellaneous: 7 Lots of potential here.
Final Score: 30 I like this article, though I think you need to add ideas. Unfortunately, I don't have any right now, but I'm going to watch this page and come back when I do. Cheerio. P.S. the absurdity of the ducks is stupidly funny.
Reviewer: Ljlego 00:05, 10 April 2007 (UTC)


I quite like the huge image, just for hugeness, but maybe that's just me. I agree that a mock serious tone is generally a Good Thing, but to introduce one would really mean another rewrite or at least considerable lengthening as at the moment there is nothing serious about it. As I'm too lazy to do this I'm inclined to leave it as it is but feel free to have a go yourself. If you have any more specific ideas please let me know. --Kelpan 21:13, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Personal tools
projects