Talk:Diplomacy

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(talk)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
:Thank you. That'll be $8.50 per joke. --{{User:Cainad/sig}} 18:25, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 
:Thank you. That'll be $8.50 per joke. --{{User:Cainad/sig}} 18:25, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 
::Looks like a probably feature once completed - great already :) [[User:RabbiTechno|RabbiTechno]] 18:26, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 
::Looks like a probably feature once completed - great already :) [[User:RabbiTechno|RabbiTechno]] 18:26, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
  +
  +
== From Pee Review ==
  +
Formerly a red link on [[User:Isra1337/vital|Isra1337's page of important-ful topics]], this article is now a blue link on the aforementioned page.
  +
  +
But the question remains, ladies and gentlemen: Is... it... ''not crap''? --{{User:Cainad/sig}} 07:27, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  +
  +
{{Pee Review Table
  +
|Hscore= 9
  +
|Hcomment= Good Use Of Humour Like the Way Diplomacy Is Referred To As Violence and the complete opposite of real diplomacy
  +
|Cscore= 10
  +
|Ccomment= Cleaver idea, well executed
  +
|Pscore= 9
  +
|Pcomment= good use of language
  +
|Iscore= 8
  +
|Icomment= like the guy with the hammer but could of used another picture in the bottom section
  +
|Mscore= 9
  +
|Mcomment= like the table. it helps get the idea across
  +
|Fscore= 9
  +
|Fcomment= Overall great article. needs a few more pictures in my opinion though
  +
|Signature= [[User:Bonner|Bonner]] 13:15, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
  +
}}

Latest revision as of 18:22, June 17, 2007

Nice article so far. --thematrixeætsyou, the sexy beast (talk) (flames) 06:44, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. That'll be $8.50 per joke. --The Acceptable Thinking cap small Cainad Sacred Chao (Fnord) 18:25, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Looks like a probably feature once completed - great already :) RabbiTechno 18:26, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

edit From Pee Review

Formerly a red link on Isra1337's page of important-ful topics, this article is now a blue link on the aforementioned page.

But the question remains, ladies and gentlemen: Is... it... not crap? --The Acceptable Thinking cap small Cainad Sacred Chao (Fnord) 07:27, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Humour: 9 Good Use Of Humour Like the Way Diplomacy Is Referred To As Violence and the complete opposite of real diplomacy
Concept: 10 Cleaver idea, well executed
Prose and formatting: 9 good use of language
Images: 8 like the guy with the hammer but could of used another picture in the bottom section
Miscellaneous: 9 like the table. it helps get the idea across
Final Score: 45 Overall great article. needs a few more pictures in my opinion though
Reviewer: Bonner 13:15, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects