Talk:Democrat Party

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 23:50, December 9, 2010 by SPIKE (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Democrat Party article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that.
For a listing of unused images related to this topic, please see the image subpage.

Article policies
Bloink1 solid
This article was nominated for deletion on January 5, 2007.
The result of the discussion was 'Keep'.




Nuvola apps important WARNING! Nuvola apps important
Baby crying closeup
This page contains profuse whining. Proceed with caution.
Vindictive Warrior 03:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)


This article sucks. Try being original instead of jsut copying and pasting from some website.

---

Uh, does it bother anyone that this article uses the word "Spades"? *blink-blink* Isn't that a racial slur?

no, it doesn't. 67.172.61.222 22:54, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
haha... since when did uncyclopedia care about bothering people? PsychoMedic 15:34, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
nobody did imo who cares

Is you peeple jus' a bunch o' demmycrats? Cain'choo spell crecklee? Case if'n you caint, shoo dawgey, lawd dat jus' beat all! Now wutchoo say spades? Rayshl sloy? Is you peeple got nuttin t' talk 'bout? Who dis Jsut fella, anyhow? I aint huhd fom him nun! And wuchoo lammees doin' fussin' 'bout dem 'public'ns fo'? Laste I huhd d'aint no pahtees like dat ovuhseas so wuchoo 'plainin' 'bout commies fo'? D'aint no lawnguh inny sovee'choonyun no mo', 'cep'in' ovuh in chiner an' suhtin playsiz like dat: linninz ded, stollinz ded, hitluhz ded, d'aint no commies t' wu'y 'bout no mo' so you c'n jus' heshup on dat mattuh! An' wye you wanna be a po' demmycrat? You think it do innyboddy inny good 'plainin' 'bout de uppuh clayse? If po's wuchoo wants to be den dat's how you's gwineter stay. B't if you smottin up an' ac' straight, well now den mebby terdayz yo' luckee day! 'Cose e'y man'z gotta fend fo' himse'f, y'see. Don' let no gummen'al pahtee bodder wi'choo: speekin' pus'nlee dat bidnis is stricklee fo' de buhds. Futhuhmo', I b'leev dis place is fo' puttin' up sum hyoomuh fo' fo'ks ter laff at, b' I'm sho' you noo dat. Minny things heer is sujestid in a kinder mannuh call'd tung-in-cheek, so wut sum fo'ks say ain't nessise'ly wut dey mean. Liv' an' luhn. An' fo' hevvinz sayx, git ridduh dem chips on y' shou'duhs, s'm'boddy needs de wood!—Aybabtu 06:30, 6 January 2007 (UTC)




WUTS UP WITH THOSE DONKEYS......................  :< ......................they think their the rulers of the world........why dont they step aside, and let BUSH take the wheel.............if we let the situation in IRAQUE fly by, we will endup with wut we did in world war 2...AND THAT IS A SUCKY SITUATION..............................................the world is at its prime right now, because the average man in the world lives comfortably, not in worry about things every second of the day ......every day.....,every month......,every year.......,every decade..... so why dont u democrats just be chill.....


Two things one- why should this be merged with the republican party article??? and number two us so you are saying most of the people in africa live comfertably? and we shouldn't have gone to iraq in the first place the only reason we went was becuase bush is a HUGE IDIOT, and went to a war that couldn't be won and created a civil war by kicking out sadam hussain (who we put into power) which is killing american soldiers and iraqui civilians. and actually at the end of world war 2 we were pwning cause america (exept pearl harbor) wasn't hurt at all while we DESTROYED like 90% of the cities in japan with firebombing, we got nukes, germany fell, and we got out of a economic depression.......... and so going to kill hundreds of thousands of civilians in iraq is chilling??? i think BUSH needs to chill & get inpeached

edit This Article Sucks

This article is not funny whatsoever. While it is culturally relavent to have an article for each major American Political party, you make your own party look bad when your "satire" sucks balls. This shit needs a comprehensive rewrite, and the only reason I'm not suggesting a deletion is the afformented cultural relevance. 69.19.14.17 03:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs fixin', please feel obligated to make whatever changes you feel are needed, (even though they'll probably be reverted 5 seconds later). Uncyclopedia is a wiki, so almost anyone can edit almost any article by almost simply following the edit link almost at the top. You don't even need to log in in most cases! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to...) The Uncyclopedia Cabal encourages you to be italic. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly, and your 6 month ban will fly by faster than you think. If you're not sure how editing works, check out proper wiki formatting, or use the sandbox to try out your vandalizing skills. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:33, Dec 30
Personal tools
projects