Talk:Buster Keaton

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Bmup smaller The Proofreading Service has proofreaded your article. Like it? Need more proofreading? Click here!

Proofread today. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:47, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

edit Pee Review 1

Humour: 7 Parts were funny, but some was just a bit too random.
Concept: 7 Decent concept.
Prose and formatting: 10 Formatted well.
Images: 8 Decent, but somehow I feel you could get a few bit better ones.
Miscellaneous: 10 10s make boxes go green?
Final Score: 42 Decent start, but could be made better. Read how to be funny and not just stupid again. With some work this could make VFH.
Reviewer: --- UnIdiot | GUN | Talk | Contribs - 00:20, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

edit Pee Review 2

edit Buster Keaton

If you ahve any funny ideas for quotes I'd greatly appreciate it.--Dr. Fenwick 22:52, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Humour: 8 Damned fine.
Concept: 8.5 Excellent subject for Uncyc, not only notable but a comic as well.
Prose and formatting: 8 Very well done.
Images: 8 Appropriate, well-captioned.
Miscellaneous: 8 I like this. A lot.
Final Score: 40.5
Reviewer: ----OEJ 12:45, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Endnotes: Only caveat is probably due to my status as a thickoid. What does the sentence --

"Then perhaps the cow that tipped over the lamp that started the great Chicago Fire happened in late October or some month with 28 days."

-- mean? Somehow...I don't get it.

All the authors trying to write biographical articles should have a look at this one. It has exactly the unity of character and plot that I'm always nattering on about. Plus it has it's own voice and style.

Just a few gentle strokes at the end of the second paragraph of Box Office Rivals and it's ready for VFH. (Although I have spectacularly bad judgment about what works on VFH, apparently.)

----OEJ 12:45, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

edit Featured!

I'm so excited my first featured article I mus sound like a major n00b--Dr. Fenwick 07:39, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

I've prtoected the page cause I don't want tpeople editing it during the two days it's displayed on the front page. It's protection banner will be removed after that, someone putting a joke about Gary Coleman was the factor in this decision.--Dr. Fenwick 18:09, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

You can't protect an article. However, an administrator can--Sir Manforman CUN 18:19, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Yesh. Just to clarify, putting on a template doesn't magically protect a page. Also, we're pretty good with vandalism. Most of us have nothing better to do than patrol recent changes anyhow. Unless we all magically get a life, you've nothing to worry about.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 18:51 Oct 20, 2007
I think it would be a great if it was like {{FFA/include}} (but only it would be cascade protected) and when it is on the Main Page for the two days, it would automatically be cascade protected--Sir Manforman CUN 18:58, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Oh sorry, thanks.--Dr. Fenwick 03:35, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Personal tools