Talk:Barack Obama/old

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Um no. Put the funny article as the main article. If someone wants to read seriously about this man, then they can go to Wikipedia. PUT THE FUNNY ARTICLE ON.


Bloink1 solid
This article was nominated for deletion on May 13, 2009.
The result of the discussion was Keep.


Bloink1 solid
This article was nominated for deletion on February 8, 2008.
The result of the discussion was Keep.

Pre-Colonization Archive

article colonized 5/3/09. you're welcome! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC)


This article is terribly unfunny. The preceding unsigned comment was added by 204.111.231.149 (talk • contribs)

I know you miss your black jokes and Super Obama edits. Rest assured, they can be found here. Saberwolf116 12:14, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

The caption for the photo is hilarious!

But why was the previous version deleted? the new one is so watered down and hardly an accurate portrayal of the messiah. 70.181.150.70 20:27, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Because the old one, like many of our popular articles, was a clusterfuck of crap with some decent jokes here and there. If you like the old one, just check my user page- I keep a record of all of them. Saberwolf116 22:16, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

The original was hilarious and far more combative. Current BO makes little reference to his smoking/cocain past, ridiculous accusation that he was raised by islamic terrorists, his relationship with former terrorists and crazy religious fundies, his extreme partisanship (to contrast with the false-image of uniqueness, other than being half-black), and many other easily-parodied topics. Do you really find the current article funny? He is PRESIDENT, certainly we can do better. I think there is a photoshopped picture where he is sucking amhadanajidaddadiwwhatever off. A hilarious allusion to oreo's rather passive approach to "rogue" nations. 70.181.156.123 00:19, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

YA LOL I TTLY AGREE FUC BRAK OMBAHA HES DA WOSRT PRESIDENT EVRRR ARE ARTIKLE SHUD B AOBUT HOW MUCH HE SUX LOL --Anonymous IP Address #1
NO WAI U GUISE R TTLY DUM N I HATE U FR SAYIN DAT HES DA BEST PRESDIBENT EVR N U GUISE R FUKN DUM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! --Anonymous IP Address #2
DUN BE STUPID FGT U DONT EVN NO SHIT ABOTU ECNOMINICS N I DO SO SHUT DA FUK UP --Anonymous IP Address #1
NUH UH FGT HES GONA TTLY FIX AMREICA SO FU FU FU --Anonymous IP Address #2
*both IPs forget the URL for this website and move back to yahoo answers*
Did I get that conversation about right? Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. - T.L.B. Baloon WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 02:19, May 10

This is not funny at all - "..focusing on repairing the economy..." this is real life bs and fucking depressing to read on uncyclopedia!!! Come on! Sakkie, JHB, South Africa. 17:03, 15 May 2009 (GMT+2)

We should just copy straight from conservapedia. Conservapedia is like Fox News without the altar boys

Yes, bring back the original article. This version sucks. It is really disturbing that it was removed without any concensus. --217.207.170.228 10:11, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
This is the unfunniest article ever. It's so boring.The preceding unsigned comment was added by 114.108.192.50 (talk • contribs)
Personal tools
projects