Talk:Bangladesh

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 17:41, July 7, 2011 by 65.209.85.34 (talk)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bangladesh article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that.
For a listing of unused images related to this topic, please see the image subpage.

Article policies

edit Featured Article

I'm thinking of nominating this as a featured article. However, I haven't had much time to make it better. Can somebody help me improve the quality (spelling, grammar, etc.) and maybe write some more content? -InMooseWeTrust

Hey man, I'll give it a go. I wrote a lot of this article a few months back, but since then it's been plagued by people who, well, don't seem to have English as their first language. To put it politely. That is why sections of the article have become plain nonsensical. Anyway, I'll have a look at it - Golam Murtaza

I wrote a really good history section and rewrote some of the other stuff over the summer, but it looks like somebody ruined it. I'm going to revert it soon, and then you can do whatever you want with it. InMooseWeTrust 19:12, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

edit Question

Why not talk about just how evil it is? The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.110.0.81 (talk • contribs)

You are evil. What's so evil about pathetic Bangladesh except that they export contraband guns and RDX (a type of explosive) to India and forment trouble? Give us more input on what you mean.
To the dude/dudette (i seriously doubt if there are any dudettes in uncycl. but it feels nice to think there are) who changed the oscar wildism - is yours funny?--Mowgli 03:58, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

edit More Images please!

The title of this section says it all really. This article could be better than it is if there are more decent images with cool captions. Genuinely funny ones, not just nonsensical or obscene stuff. Anyone fancy adding some stuff? I would, but I'm the CEO of a global corporation. So I'm REALLY BUSY!!

It is a bullshit article written by a stupid. I am sure he must be an Indian national. It is ridiculous. I think he should also look into India too. Because India also have that sort of problem. There are many places in India where people loiter nude.Every now and then Indian farmers are committing suicide. Indian one of the rogue country of the world. More than 40% people of India living under poverty line. In India more than 80% people do not sanitary latrines. They use their fields as latrines.

The previous paragraph demonstrates the hypocrisy of Bangladeshis. They hate India so much, but the exact reasons why they hate India are also true of their own country (often to a greater extent). Besides, look at the article on India and you'll find things equally derogatory. -InMooseWeTrust

edit random bollocks for the trivia

the collective noun for Bangladeshis is "A flood of..."

edit Post-Review Talk

Hi, I'm semi-stalking you here, I like the changes you have made so far, it's definitely heading in the right direction. The pictures are probably most important, if you clean it up a bit more and just generally refine it (especially getting rid of stuff that might seem to be overkill, don't want to stick on one point for too long - like the surnames bit), I can help get some images to support the text. I can also give it a read through and do some of my own edits later, if you want. Keep up the good work --El Sid, the lazy oneparlez-vous franglais? 20:39, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Also, although I really wish we could have pages on things like the Indus Valley Civilisation, we don't, and red broken links tend to make the article uglier. I would suggest trying to link to something close to the desired article (so for "Aryan" -> "Iranian" or even "German" I guess, but preferably something that makes the article funny or is informative). I'm doing an article at the moment and one of the many things I'm going to have to do when I eventually get round to cleaning it up is just going through deleting links that don't either a) help explain something the reader might not now b) add to the humour. I think too many links might just look a bit messy. --El Sid, the lazy oneparlez-vous franglais? 20:51, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I know the red links are a problem. The only problem for me is that no one will write those articles. There's plenty of opportunity there to have some fun. InMooseWeTrust 13:21, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


INDIANS AAAAAAAAAAH: EVEN HERE THE INDiANS CANT sTOP JUSTIFYING THEMSELVES "previously a part of Great Pakistan but as the Pakistani army tried to cleanse away the Hindu population through murder and massacre, India invaded and captured it. It has since maintained its great influence over the people of Bangladesh and has stopped all mass genocides com" ohhhh this is infuriating

Personal tools
projects