Bloink1 solid
This article was nominated for deletion on July 18, 2014.
The result of the discussion was Keep.

I may be wrong - I usually am - but to me, although this article is witty and well-written, benefiting especially from its somewhat dry tone and intelligent use of vivid imagery, it reads more like a personal (albeit lighthearted) championing of asexuality than a parody of real life. Most of what is not opinion-based is essentially true without much embellishment for comedic purposes (e.g. the symbol for asexuality), and while I obviously have no problem with such an article per se, it's not very funny.

Can't we have a bit more bullshit please? This isn't Wikipedia you know...The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk • contribs)

I feel the "banana" punchline is rather the apex of hilarity. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-usMon, May 21 '12 8:00 (UTC)
There is nothing to stop you writing your own article or helping to add to an existing one. Make an account and do your best. Uncyclopedia welcomes all types of humour, the bottom line is that the articles/images/captions should be funny. PS, also sign your posts. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:10, May 21, 2012 (UTC)


I actually am asexual and found this article to be quite boring, but chose not to down vote it during VFH due to the fact that I may be biased. So now I am wondering, are there any other asexuals here, specifically that contributed to this and/or voted for its feature?◄► Tephra ◄► 06:20, May 31, 2012 (UTC)

I, for one, have no comment, as my six-foot-long, constantly-engorged penis disqualifies me utterly from discussions on this topic. (By-the-bye, you wouldn't happen to have a spare hooker lying about, would you?) ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-usThu, May 31 '12 6:36 (UTC)
I rather liked the article, I didn't expect to see an article on this site that was not blatantly and deliberately full of false information. 17:48, June 15, 2015 (UTC)