Talk:Arnold Schoenberg

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

This article is cramping my style. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 00:56, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Don't know what's funny about this article, the same crap is written on real Wikipedia. How about some creativeness? -- 15:02, June 12, 2012 (UTC)

I love the article. I think it's the combination of the objective, neutral tone and encyclopedic style of the article and the trashing of Schönberg's music that I like. Schamschi, 20:13, June 12, 2012 (UTC)

This article sounds exactely like the wikipedia article. How about a bit creativity? -- 22:54, January 3, 2014 (UTC)

Are you kidding? Or do you think it's "funny" to repeat what the first Anon said? Superficial resemblance to Wikipedia is a good thing. The substance is very different. Spıke Ѧ 23:37 3-Jan-14

edit If You're Going To be Funny, Be Funny

This isn't clever enough. If you wish to make fun of Schoenberg, get right inside his art and choose the mots justes that ping his shortcomings. He was a most serious artist. I, too, decried his works until I studied them. I don't love his music, but I understand and revere them as Art, just as I do the efforts of painters and poets and others whose products don't please me, but whose sincerity and achievement is beyond serious question by those who delve, instead of adopting the sophomoric stance of sneering at anything beyond their understanding. A sound - and humorous - critique of Schoenberg's work would be welcome, even by the man himself. But not undergraduate yocks. 10:07, November 16, 2015 (UTC)

You are welcome to improve this article or work on a new one to replace it (if it gets voted to be deleted). This isn't a featured article so all users can work on any article. Registered users have more access rights than an I.P. number and others can talk to you if they agree or disagree with changes to an article. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 10:55, November 16, 2015 (UTC)
Yes, indeed! Your knowledge and personal change of opinion might make you the perfect candidate to move the article closer to the real thing (if you can resist the urge to instruct the reader). Spıke Radiomicrophone15:19 16-Nov-15
Personal tools