Talk:Anime

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 06:17, February 19, 2012 by Fakeaccount (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Anime article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that.
For a listing of unused images related to this topic, please see the image subpage.

Article policies
“This article does not interest me, but if there are any aliens, sliders, time travelers or espers seek me out. I have to rape mikuru now!!”
~ suzumiya haruhi on on this whole article

< YixilTesiphon> why the hell do people like anime < punkrockchica> uhhbecause it's awesome < Fakeaccount> because it's better than Jersey Shore and Fanboy and Chum Chum. < NomadscienceII> yix: because we're all japedophiles http://cornell.ashen.us/qdb/?action=show&id=15


Geez... no matter how many times this page is created, it never fails to suck. --UNKNOWNFILE 03:02, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Guess people mistaken this to be article about vaccum cleaner, "it must suck to be good" :p . Contributor seem to focus too much on specify title rather than parody Anime as whole (not that it's easy, I admit). Ace Attacker 16:00, 3 March 2007 (UTC)


edit Why delete the original?

The page before this was much better in terms of satire and actually making fun of anime without the rampant Family Guy style idiocy being posted.

Agree. If the quality of this article won't improve, I can see this new one will got deleted as well. Ace Attacker 06:53, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
They'll all get deleted and the first was the best. It got deleted cause the pricks here don't like lists (or anime in general for that matter). Mr. Briggs Inc. 15:31, 4 March 2007 (UTC) Eh?
If this isn't fixed in two weeks to something vaguely entertaining, I'm going to completely redo this article. It would be one week but standardized testing is a violation of my 8th amendment rights. Railcgun 02:36, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Fixed it up a little bit. Rewrote some of the crap. I'll see what I can do with it tomorrow. Axalon 03:27, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

I nominated the original page for VFD since it was becoming a chore to read through. The number one way to avoid having people liking your article is to make it excessively long. To conclude this post, a quote from Jack Mort:

“I am more than happy for Uncyc to be bloated with anime articles, provided they are well-written, coherent and funny to people who don't even know the show.”
~ Jack Mort on anime articles

(from the One Piece VFD nomination) --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|» 03:05, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Also, advice to those writing the article: Don't let your article become a list. --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|» 03:06, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

The way I see it, this article has turned into a flamewar between anti-anime rednecks and pro-anime fags. Let those whom are neutral about the article write it without this bs outside interference. I move that we protect it until further notice. Railcgun 22:12, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

edit Trivia Game

Which of the non-current last-gen consoles is the radio host's favorite?

edit from VFD

Keep
  • Keep. I do not see why everyone is so worked up about the article. --Medvedev (scream)Grue_Jammy.gif 07:31, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong keep There are some OK jokes near the beginning about animation style and genres. An article like this is bound to get some cruft. Tag for cleanup. --Alksubsig.gifAlksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 08:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, but remove those ugly images. --AAA! (AAAA) 09:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • Horrid excuse for an article. Mostly just a list, with the most unimaginative descriptions. The only way this article can be saved is through a complete rewrite, or better yet, just a huff. --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|» 21:43, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Put it out of its misery. I can only see that this article will get worse, and we need to prevent that from happening. --General Insineratehymn 21:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Huff It and let it be rewritten by a slightly more intelligent 12-year old. --Smrt-guy 23:31, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete with gusto, it's not funny in any way whatsoever, the only option, Total Recall, oh yeah. -- (Elmis 05:14, 22 February 2007 (UTC))
  • Poor hitlerbear!!!---Small_Pineapple2.png» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 07:09, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Just say no to anime. --GeorgeRI.jpg» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) SpacerSpacerSpacerSpacerSpacerSpacerIcons-flag-gb 30px-Coatsmxa.pngSpacerSpacerSpacerIcons-flag-usSpacerSpacerSpacer 07:28, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and rewrite. This article is just awful, not funny at all. --TheSlyFox 10:21, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete because I hate anime!Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:45, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Comment: The only thing this article attempts to be is a list of "this sucks, that sucks." We can do better. The whole thing needs a rewrite, IMO. --TheSlyFox 10:21, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Sikon did it. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:28, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

edit Rewrite

Hey, I got an idea doing my chemistry homework last night. I am working on a rewrite which confuses "anime" with "amine." It's not the best idea ever, but it is the best idea that's ever been applied to this article (at least as long as I've been watching it) and, more importantly, it'll scare away any IPs who think they can mess with it. Ideas and pictures would be appreciated, especially since I don't watch most of the shows mentioned. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 05:16, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Okay, nobody replied in over a month and a half, so I finished up my rewrite, for the most part, and added it to Pee Review. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 22:01, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
I for one like it and good job! Chemistry is still knowledge obscure to many people, I would think though, but if it's understandable, it makes anime an article accessible to those not just in the anime-know, but still make enough references to be appreciated by OTaKUs (could do with more references, maybe). However, I suppose this warrants the rewrite of the Manga article to be some sort of functional group with manganese, huh? --The Dit 07:28, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
"Manga"-nese? Haha, that's brilliant! I don't think I'd be the one to do it, though. I hardly ever read manga. Mostly just Excel Saga, and a little FMA. Also, manganese is (unfortunately) the most boring element that ever existed. But still, it's a nice idea. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 18:20, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Anyway, even this article was lacking in mentions of manganese, so I'll start it here. --The Dit 16:41, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

edit Notes on the rewrite

  • I thank the author of Garrison Keillor; that was a similar idea.
  • Pronounce it like you would "amine." AN-EEM. Big accent on first syllable; little on second. "Animo" is uh-NEE-mo. On a related note, please forgive the presence of the word "animes." Had to be done, had to be done.
  • Someone needs to write an article on Shonen Jump. Now.
  • The idea of "diluted" linking to Adult Swim is that the anime are on so late at night, and surrounded by so many frankly strange shows, that they lose their anime punch, if you will, sort of like an acid dissolved in water.
  • I put Bleach in its own category partly to make a pun on the original word bleach (bleaches are typically bases in chemistry) and partly to bring attention to Monika's brilliance. As a great man once said, "[Bleach] will... go down as the one great anime article on Uncyclopedia."
  • There's supposed to be something along the lines of "acid = shounen, salt = shoujo" going on, but I may have messed that up. Please forgive me.

--Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 22:01, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

edit From Pee Review..

Trying to save this article from the brink. Seems too focused on individual anime as opposed to anime in general. Still quite a work in progress. Any suggestions are welcome.--Axalon 04:46, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Humour: 3.14159. Meh. It's an improvement, but it doesn't really add up to the other article, which was a mindless otaku list mind you.
Concept: 7 Already a concept.
Prose and formatting: 9.5 Much betterly formatted. Props.
Images: 2.0 I see only two images. Hence, 2.0.
Miscellaneous: 7 Mum
Final Score: 33.5 It's an improvement, but still needs more work. I maintain my earlier threat to huff it in two weeks. Maybe add more pictures.
Reviewer: Railcgun 01:49, 8 March 2007 (UTC)


edit Recomendation

Currently, the article has some very humorous silly points but needs to harness the stinger of satire. While old comedy would be very nice, this article needs something more in the style of Pratchet, Bierce, Swift, or maybe even Vonnegut.

Whoever decides to fix this up should first research amino acids and protein folding to get an idea of the structure of this article, than read as many articles about specific animes in both wiki and uncyclopedia to learn about trends and patterns. After that, these trends should be written along the amino acid lines to present the essential anime, as well as its subcategories. The facts shouldn't be said w/ outright comedic flamboyance, but should instead employ a subtle joke in rewording, not as a pun, but as a way to show what normally seems logical as totally illogical or give information so true that it is funny, such as saying that anime can be fatal to women also consuming romance.

Wow... That sounds like it might be nice, but I'm not about to rewrite the entire article (again), not when it's getting a decently good reception right now. I worked on this for almost two full months, and though I must confess I know little about amines and scarcely more about anime, I don't think it's capable of getting a whole lot better. It doesn't need accurate chemical references to be funny; it's supposed to be about ANIME first, with a layer of chem on top. If anyone else thinks they can do better, they are welcome to, but I'm pretty much done. I'll let it run its course on VFH; if it gets featured, yay, if it doesn't, oh well. I just wanted to make the anime article not suck, that's all. I think we can all agree that I accomplished that, so if you'll excuse me, I'm not going to mess with it any more. You're right, it could be more satirical, but this version is not bad (20 voters support me). --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 03:54, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

edit Holy shit this is funny

This is possibly the funniest article I've found on Uncyclopedia. I laughed so hard I cried. Great work. Dark Shikari 04:35, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

I agree, most articles on Uncylopedia end up pretty much the same and their not funny. Good to find an actual funny article for once. =) Alcryt 15:23, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

edit From Pee Revew 2

edit Anime

Just put my rewrite of this old article out there. It is COMPLETELY different from everything that has been tried about Anime so far, so what does everyone think? --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 21:54, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Humour: 7 Needs more cowbell in the humor section.
Concept: 10 Excellent concept!
Prose and formatting: 6 Average formatting, nothing too special.
Images: 3 Needs more images.
Miscellaneous: 0 n/a
Final Score: 26 Excellent concept, could be a bit funnier. Perhaps you could head over to Image Request and get some images done? Anyways, this is on the way to being featured.
Reviewer: 14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|»


animes are also are card playing retards. there very stupid when it comes to sex also just think the asian invasion.

edit Anime View

Can we get rid of the first part of the Anime View section (Animes are really Chineese/Japs. So we should kill the commies.)? It's completely unrelated and frankly unfunny. I don't see how it made it into the article in the first place. Agreed. Done. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 17:51 Mar 2 2010

edit Interwikis

Add the interwiki of the Uncyclopedia in portuguese (Desciclopédia) [[pt:Anime]] 201.89.159.250 21:08, April 10, 2010 (UTC)

edit Just a chemistry correction

Otaku has a positive formal charge, not negative. Not sure if it is intentionally put as negative.

Personal tools
projects