Too much actual legitimate information. Not that that's a bad thing, but please save that sort of vandalism for Wikipedia.--184.108.40.206 04:48, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
The point is it's accurate except for the war technology. I think this is funnier than if it was some random crap about martians and Tv's Frank and what not.
--RudolfRadna 13:59, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Too much real data (except for the war pictures. I sense a wikipedian conspiracy here.
yeah, a lot of real info. i agree. needs a rework?
I'm going to re-write this whole article. It has a lot of random nonsense and a lot of fact in it, neither of which is funny. I'll tie it in to a few other articles dealing with the subject too. any objections? Skinfan13 23:27, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
I thought something up a while ago when I convinced someone the civil war never happened. It was basically an extended rant on how the Potato Famine spread to America and people died b/c of that and Sherman was a famous farmer...
It has potential but would dominate the article too much. It would be nice to incorporate stuff from Articles on all the key players and write how it all fits together.
@whoever wrote the last bit: yeah, I wanted to make the article fit into the articles for both the northern and southern players in the war. it would be funnier that way. what we have right here is a stupid very pro-union article that doesn't come across as funny, just annoying. like I said, I'll come up with a draft over the next few days and present it here. I'll save the old article onto a word file and if the new article isn't liked, I'll put the old one back. Skinfan13 19:40, 7 July 2009 (UTC)