Talk:Admin Banning Tools
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
WHAT? NO BANSTICK!? --21:30, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Banhammers are used here, it can really hurt. My advice is just don't get yourself in the target range. Anyway, good article, well written and obviously under good hands. + 18.104.22.168 19:48, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
From Pee ReviewI'd like a little review before I put take it out of my namespace, add categories, and request more images.--~ 20:15, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
|Humour:||7||Good jokes, though of course in-jokes.|
|Concept:||7||Category = in-jokes, hence popular with old users and incomprehensible to newbies and casual visitors.|
|Prose and formatting:||5||Needs polish. See endnotes.|
|Miscellaneous:||7||I like the piece. Famine, however, does not act slowly!|
|Reviewer:||----OEJ 00:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC)|
The prose could use some polishing. "At times, to relinquish their foe, admins decide to use the weapons of other admins." Maybe they use it to vanquish their foe? I'm not sure what you mean. "Extreme admiration to Phil Collins" -- no, admiration of Phil Collins.
Just minor stuff, but it makes the reader stub his mental toes and curse.
"It's secret recipe asbestos is also used often in other applications such as encircling flamewars." Um? Asbestos isn't a recipe, it's an ingredient. And "encircling"? Maybe "Its secret ingredient, asbestos, is often used in other applications such as dousing flamewars." Or "quenching flamewars"? Or "smothering flamewars"?
Anyway. Revise, revise. Then edit. After that, revise. ;) ----OEJ 00:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC)