Uncyclopedia:Reviewer of the Month

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Redirected from RotM)
Jump to: navigation, search



Welcome to the official page for the official award Reviewer of the Month.


Pee reviewer of the month award

The Golden Party Badge; the official insignia of the Reviewer of the Month.

To qualify for the Reviewer of the Month award, you must first meet certain criteria.

  1. You must be a registered user.
  2. You must not have nominated yourself. You can vote for yourself, but not nominate yourself.
  3. You must have done at least one review within the last month.

Rules and guidelines

These are the rules and less-official guidelines for the Reviewer of the Month.

  1. IP votes carry full weight. Because many IPs submit articles for review, they benefit from good Reviewers as much as anyone else does. IPs get a full vote instead of the usual half-vote.
  2. Nominate those reviewers who have consistently given exceptional reviews. If a user happened to review multiple articles of yours but never gave any suggestions for improvement, do not nominate them. There are many other, far more deserving users out there.
  3. You can only vote once. You can cancel your vote using slashes to change your vote, but you still only get one vote to cast every month.
  4. Additionally, when a user is nominated, the nomination template {{VoteRotM}} should be added to their user page.


Tell 'em what they won, Jon!:

Past Winners

One-eyed JackCajekMrN9000Under user (2) • SysRqHeerenveenMightydandylionYesTimeToEditOrian57Hyperbole (2) • GerrycheeversSycamoreBlueYonderNachladerMnbvcxzTagstitIronLungProjectmayhem666Saberwolf116StaircaseChiefjusticeDS (2) • PuppyOnTheRadio (2) • Siddhartha-WolfGuildensternensteinWhy do I need to provide this?NecropaxxHiatus HerniaSkinfan13Black flamingo11 (2) • MatfenHELPMEJohn LydonPeregrineFalcon999LyrithyaJackOfSpadesOliphaunte (2) • Shabidoo (3) • Magic manFrostyMattsnowAnton199

There are five archives:

Official Nominations For August 2014

SPIKE (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: -1
  1. Symbol for vote For. Despite the fact that he doesn't write Pee Reviews, Spike has been Uncyclopedia's most active reviewers for a long time. The feedback he gives to new users about their articles is priceless, which is not an exaggeration, and I know this from my own experience. I am not sure I would have stayed and edited uncy for so long, if it wasn't for the amount of time and efforts Spike has offered to me and to my first articles! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 23:35, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol against vote Against. I've thanked Anton199 elsewhere for the compliment, but this ain't right: You can't nominate for top Pee Reviewer someone who famously never does Pee Reviews, on the basis that I do stuff that's comparably good. Nominate me for something else some day, perhaps. Spıke ¬ 02:20 17-Sep-14
  3. Symbol against vote Against. Yeah I guess not. Maybe we could have a separate award for someone who gives lots of advice but not in formal pee reviews? -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 17:08 21 Sep 2014
  4. Comment. I was reviewer of the month once... --ChiefjusticeWii 17:11, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

Black flamingo11 (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 2014
  1. Symbol for vote For. Why not? --OliOmniOmbudsman Dumbo 23:03, September 24, 2014 (UTC)
Personal tools