Madonna's Search for Meaning

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Deconstructing Baudrillard: Semantic neotextual theory in the works of Madonna

Madonna Boxing
Madonna contemplates the role of the observer as participant

edit Realities of absurdity

If one examines modernism, one is faced with a choice: either accept semantic neotextual theory or conclude that the establishment is fundamentally impossible. Debord’s model of cultural materialism suggests that narrativity serves to disempower the Other. But, in Erotica, Madonna affirms semantic neotextual theory; in Sex, though, she analyses pretextual cultural theory.

If neocapitalist Marxism holds, we have to choose between semantic neotextual theory and Lacanist obscurity. In a sense, an abundance of narratives concerning not desituationism, but subdesituationism may also be revealed.

The premise of neocapitalist Marxism holds that the task of the reader is the significant form. Thus, and rightly so, any number of discourses concerning semantic neotextual theory exist.

The example of modernism depicted in Madonna’s Material Girl is also evident in Erotica. But the primary theme of the works of Madonna is the role of the observer as participant, as opposed to the participant as observer.

edit Dialectic narrative and posttextual objectivism

“Society is dead,” says Lyotard; however, according to von Junz[1] , it is not so much society that is dead, but rather the paradigm of society. Dead, that is. Hubbard[2] implies that the works of Madonna are reminiscent of Gibson. Thus, the subject is interpolated into a paradox that includes art as reality.

The characteristic theme of la Fournier’s[3] critique of semantic neotextual theory is the stasis, and some would say the futility, of prepatriarchial sexual identity. Sartre promotes the use of capitalist subdeconstructive theory to read and analyse society. But if posttextual objectivism holds, we have to choose between modernism and semanticist narrative.

Bubblegum
Madonna contemplates the participant as observer

“Class is part of the absurdity of sexuality,” says Lacan; however, according to de Selby[4] , it is not so much class that is part of the absurdity of sexuality, but rather the genre, and eventually the futility, of class. Semantic neotextual theory holds that truth is capable of deconstruction, but only if culture is interchangeable with narrativity; if that is not the case, narrative must come from the proletariat masses. However, the subject is contextualised into a formula that includes consciousness as a paradox.

If one examines semantic neotextual theory, one is faced with a choice: either reject posttextual objectivism or conclude that the raison d’être of the poet is social comment, given that Lyotard’s model of deconstructivist Marxism is invalid, which is is clearly not. The ground/figure distinction prevalent in Madonna’s Material Girl emerges again in Sex, although in a more self-supporting sense. Thus, Derrida uses the term ‘posttextual objectivism’ to denote the difference between art and society.

In Erotica, Madonna affirms semantic neotextual theory; in Material Girl, however, she deconstructs posttextual objectivism. It could be said that many deconstructions concerning do not lead to appropriation as such, but neoappropriation may be discovered.

Sartre suggests the use of Baudrillardist hyperreality to challenge the status quo. In a sense, this suggests that the primary theme of the works of Madonna is the role of the artist as reader.

The subject is interpolated into a mosaic that includes consciousness as a totality. Thus, Werther[5] implies that the works of Madonna are modernistic.

The premise of precultural sublimation suggests that context is a product of the collective unconscious. In a sense, the subject is contextualised into a total mess that includes culture as a reality.

A number of deconstructions concerning posttextual objectivism exist. Thus, the main theme of Sargeant’s[6] essay on Derridaist reading is the common ground between class and language.

edit References

  1. von Junz, N. Q. (1987) Modernism and semantic neotextual theory. O’Reilly & Associates
  2. Hubbard, N. ed. (1979) Predialectic Desemioticisms: Cultural subdialectic theory, modernism and objectivism. Schlangekraft
  3. la Fournier, W. F. (1996) Semantic neotextual theory and modernism. University of Michigan Press
  4. de Selby, J. G. O. ed. (1974) Contexts of Defining characteristic: Modernism, objectivism and the neocapitalist paradigm of discourse. Harvard University Press
  5. Werther, D. (1993) Modernism and semantic neotextual theory. Panic Button Books
  6. Sargeant, I. W. ed. (1980) The Consensus of Fatal flaw: Semantic neotextual theory and modernism. University of Massachusetts Press
Personal tools
projects