HowTo talk:Write a Bad Uncyclopedia Article

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 17:31, April 30, 2007 by Braydie (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

edit From Pee Review

These two articles are a package of sorts. That's why they must be reviewed together. An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays 20:45, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Humour: 7 I noticed that the "How To" page was a lot funnier than the "Bad Article" page. The "Bad Article" page contains the exact same jokes as the "HowTo" page, they just work a lot better in the HowTo page.
Concept: 9 Excellent idea.
Prose and formatting: 9 Nothing specific to say here. Grammar isn't really relevant in an article with deliberately bad grammar.
Images: 8 Two funny examples of horribly photoshopped images.
Miscellaneous: 5 This low rating is directed at the "Bad Article" one. I don't think you really need it. I recommend that you fuse it with the far better Howto article. These don't need to be two seperate articles at all. They use the exact same jokes.
Final Score: 38 The Howto article is good, but I question the necessity of the Bad Article. Either add more to the Bad Article so it is more than just a rehash of all the jokes in the Howto article, or maybe try to fuse them.
Reviewer: --THE 22:21, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects