HowTo:Write an Uncyclopedia article without reading any of the rules or directions or manuals or policies first

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Arguing that this rodent is a delicate metaphor for the meshing of talents one must utilise when oblivious of any of the rules or directions or manuals or policies is exactly the sort of nonsense you hopefully won't find yourself using to justify the presence of your article. If you have to justify it, you have already failed.

It's a simple enough matter.

You come along, skim a few articles, witness the spectacle and suddenly, you feel your heart lifting. The muses are with you; you have finally been inspired with a purpose in your life, a light to illuminate your way: to be a part of something larger than you are. To add to the horrible monstrosity that is Uncyclopedia.

But then you encounter a horrible problem: you do not know how. Despair not, however, for this HowTo will teach you precisely how to write an Uncyclopedia article without reading any of the rules or directions or manuals or policies first, without consulting anyone, having a basic clue as to syntax or propriety, or even understanding a thing. It's the principle of the matter. After all, you are an adventurous sort, else you wouldn't be here. You do not need help; and fortunately for you, we cater to exactly the kind of person who will charge into any situation at all without having the slightest as to what it is ahead of time, and you will not only completely fail to learn any of it as you go, but probably break a fair amount of fine china as well.[1]

Before You Start

In everything, one has to start somewhere. For this, where to start does not really matter so much as where not to start. Do not read up on what Uncyclopedia is. Do not look at what it is. If at all possible, try to avoid looking at it at all. If you are blind, cannot read, a gerbil, or better yet, using a gerbil to type for you, then chances are you are already far past the scope of this guide and will have no trouble at all creating your Uncyclopedia article without reading any of the rules or directions or manuals or policies first.


These fine fellows feel no fear and will not stop for rules or directions. They may, however, stop to eat your brain.

If you do need it spelled out for you, avoid the following:

In fact, you may want to go right ahead and avoid everything. Find yourself a gerbil and go make a sandwich while your gerbil writes for you, perhaps.

If you absolutely must do this for yourself, either because you simply cannot acquire a gerbil or you truly are an adventurous sort and know better (and couldn't find a gerbil), however, under no circumstances should you create an account. Accounts may be more secure, but the problem is, well-meaning older users have this tendency to pop by and say 'hi!' to new users, a greeting which will invariably come with suggestions, directions, and various guidelines, an eventuality that would ruin everything.

If you have already created an account and thus already joined Uncyclopedia, please feel free to despair. You may also attempt to forget everything you've learned so far, everything you might have seen or anything anyone might have told you, but that probably won't work. You can even try consulting your physician for help; given an appropriate sob story[2], he may be able to hook you up with some useful prescriptions, though it'll still be too late.


Filling your article with things that look cool that you have no idea where they came from can prove an effective means to generating content, but you still shouldn't do it.

Creating an Article

First you must create a new page. To do this, have your gerbil pick a topic, or if you're really into that sort of thing, just type something into the 'search' thing yourself, and if you absolutely must, put some content in it.


Content is a wholly unnecessary part of any article - while the software literally will not allow you to create a page without at least one character, that doesn't mean the character needs to stay on the page afterwards. But would such a straight-forward approach really be sufficiently adventurous for you? You must ask yourself this, before going any further - search deep within yourself, and inquire into the heart of your being, am I truly so lazy?

If the answer is yes, good job; you're done. You have no further use for this guide.

Quotes, images and links


This is most certainly not a suitable image to accentuate your article; the chances of an individual such as yourself managing to utilise such a fine work without looking at it are slim to none.

Now, if you truly wish to prove yourself, it is time to throw caution to the winds, to embrace your courage, and to step out into the unknown, which, unless you manage to botch even this simple matter, shall continue to remain unknown.

A good way to do this is to find a page (without looking at it, of course) containing something that seems like it might look appropriately spiffing, although you won't be able to tell for sure without looking at it, which you definitely should not do, and open it up for editing. From there, just copy the code for the spiffing part into your article. This works especially well for quotes, as they tend to not only be the first thing in most articles, but usually come with generic content fitting for any occasion. Images are also pretty easy to steal from other articles, but unlike other things, you probably will want to look at these, not because they're less likely to intrude upon your ignorance and thus ruin everything, but because some of them are just so damned hot. You must resist this urge, however crippling it may be.

Links, however, are imperative, not from any technical standpoint, but because they prevent readers from getting trapped on pages and subsequently dying of starvation. If left on the article, the dead readers will eventually start to smell, which will probably happen seeing as you are an adventurer, and that cleaning up messes is of course below your high stature as such.


Assuming you opted to fill your article with content, editing the result should be your next step. If, on the other hand, you did not fill it with content, you should not even be reading this and should in fact leave. Now.

Famke janssen 02

This woman knows exactly what she is doing. It is rather likely you do as well, now. Is this really what you wanted?

Now look at your article. Does anything major seem right about it? Remember, you're not going for 'right', here, so anything that does look right is probably a bad sign.[3] Is it pretty? Does it contain however much content your gerbil decided it should have, unless you don't actually have a gerbil, in which case this question is moot? Is it brimming with links, images, and organs? Theoretically, it should not look like an article. Theoretically, you should also not know what an article looks like, but if it does, this may mean you did a particularly incompetent job, or it may be a complete coincidence. Either way, any attempts on your part to correct the matter would probably make things worse; better to get the gerbil.


Somehow, you have done it. You have created an Uncyclopedia article, amazingly without resorting to reading any of the other rules or directions or manuals or policies first. This is an astounding accomplishment, especially for you; some new users fail on their first articles even after reading the guides and looking at examples of good articles, although as they are clearly not adventurers, nor do they have gerbils, perhaps it stands to reason some of them would manage to fare more poorly than you. But you, the adventurer, you, who learns as you go, or better yet, not at all, you, who uses Uncyclopedia without using it, have created an article.

Unfortunately, by reading and following this guide, you have failed to do so without reading any of the manuals, as this is a manual. Thus, you have subsequently failed the ultimate goal as well.

Good job.[4]


  1. It's fine because the china probably deserved it anyway.
  2. Getting mauled by a gerbil would likely suffice.
  3. If you know what 'right' looks like, that is also probably a very bad sign.
  4. Oh well..
100606 dog sniffing boots

May as well poke around now.

See Also


Potatohead aqua Featured Article  (read another featured article) Featured version: 2 September 2011
This article has been featured on the main page. — You can vote for or nominate your favourite articles at Uncyclopedia:VFH.
<includeonly>Template:FA/02 September 2011Template:FA/2011</includeonly>
Gorillatrans Featured HowTo: Article Featured on the 15th of January 2011
  This HowTo has been featured on the HowTo: namespace. Want to know HowTo get your own HowTo featured? Just write something good.
Personal tools