Forum talk:Asperger's Syndrome is no laughing matter Volume I

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

edit Request to partially blank and archive

Anybody mind if I blank most of this and put in an archive? It would be similar to what we've done with Vandalism/example on wheels! to keep browsers from getting overhwelmed when loading it. --Naughtius Maximus Leaf F@H Woof!Za slice MeowMUN 15:30, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Maybe just have a "/Page1" "/Page2" style will work. --Sir Zombiebaron 15:42, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
If we blank it, Slashy will likely replace it with more garbage, claiming we're censoring him. Let's break it up as suggested by Zombiebaron so Slashy's stupidity can be on permanent display as exceptional among its genre. --Hrodulf 15:55, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Whoah, what was that with the blue thing? Also, this should be nommed for VFH. --User:Nintendorulez 00:50, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

I nominated this Nin, but the nomination was shot down in flames: [1].

The Great Aspie War of Ought Six is doing somewhat better: Uncyclopedia:VFH#The Great Aspie War of Ought Six. That probably is better front page material since it's much shorter and you don't have to read through a lot of BS to get the funny parts. --Naughtius Maximus Leaf F@H Woof!Za slice MeowMUN 19:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

I think when you split it up we lost some content. I'll fix it later. --Hrodulf 02:03, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
OK, I tried to get it all, but it was such a long convoluted mess, I can see how I might have failed to highlight some lines when I was cutting & pasting. If you know what's missing and can restore it Hrodulf, I'd appreciate that. --Naughtius Maximus Leaf F@H Woof!Za slice MeowMUN 19:01, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
I havn't been able to do it yet because it will be time consuming. I do have a backup of it and everything is in the history of course. I'll get around to it, it's not a priority to me because I don't think anyone is dying to read it. But I think it should be as faithful as we can to what was there, just based on principle, or whatever. --Hrodulf 20:29, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Personal tools