Forum:Wikipedia "Featured" article reassessmant

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Index > BHOP > Wikipedia "Featured" article reassessmant
Note: This topic has been unedited for 2320 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

I believe that Wikipedia, as unfunny as it is, should have its article delisted from FA for multiple reasons:

1. The lead is long enough. In fact, it's a little too long. It should be split into two paragraphs or just removed altogether.

2. The history section consists of a ton of incorrect dates smushed into 3 ugly paragraphs. Plus, it's got one too many pineapples.

3. {{FA}} tag on the "See Also" section that clearly had no job being there in the first place.

Mostly criterion 1 of UN:R is what it seems to fall short on.

Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 00:26, 5 May 2008 (UTC)


  • More importantly, it's a non-notable site. I asked around, and nobody knows what it is. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:01, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects