Forum:Vote for new admins

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > Vote for new admins (talk)
Note: This topic has been unedited for 3030 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

VOTING IS CLOSED, DO NOT VOTE ANYMORE

Witty banter and congrats are allowed, however.


PLEASE DO NOT SUBMIT ADDITIONAL NOMINATIONS HERE. If you want to suggest someone for Adminship, please do so on the talk page. Potential candidates will be added here by Admins should they meet the necessary criteria. Once here, any Authorised User can vote. A vote by an Admin will count as one (1) vote, whilst votes by non-Admins will count as a half vote.

Final Vote Tally

Bold - Highest two in category. Bold Italic - Third in category. Italic - Lowest in category.

Name       Total Admin User
Zim ulator (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups) 23.5 12 11.5
Hindleyite (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups) 23 10 13
sannse (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups) 17 11 6
Zombiebaron (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups) 13 6 7
King In Yellow (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups) 12 6 6

Current Nominated Candidates

Sannse (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Opped. The "voting" isn't over, and it's up to admin discretion, but two additional lowlifes may be made admins once it is. --KATIE!! 18:05, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Symbolic Opping Upheld Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 16:26, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Please continue to vote on this nomination. Don't stop because she was opped; we want complete final scores. Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 18:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)


I nearly de-opped myself because the vote isn't over, but I've been convinced otherwise by the cab... *ahem* by an unrelated group of respected users. Thanks guys, and I look forward to welcoming in the two who really win the vote. -- sannse@Wikia (talk) 18:26, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm curious as to why sannse was opped before both hindleyite and zim, who both have higher scores overall... before the vote is even over. I'm not complaining or anything, I did support everyone here and I you'll be as good a sysop as anyone else san, it just seems a bit odd. I get curious about such things. Spang talk 18:35, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
I believe the consensus is that Sannse opping is just a matter of making official what she can do already as staff. The two brand spanking new Admins that we are hoping to add to our ranks will be a seperate issue, so it makes sense, given the support, to op her and get her out of here. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
Fair enough. There is the thing about how opping will change what she does, whether or not she could do it before, but it not really that important I suppose. ;) Hooray new sysop! One of us, one of us, etc Spang talk 19:04, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
I don't suppose it's that important either, but regardless, this does give the appearance of favoritism. I've got nothing against Sannse personally, and to some extent my saying this is also a show of favoritism because I like him, but KiY looks like the better candidate - he doesn't have a Wikipedia adminship to keep him too busy (and potentially even cause a conflict of interest), he'd be more diligent (unless he has a thesis defense coming up), he has a better understanding of how things work here (except as regards user-page aesthetics), and he's clearly good at seeking out crap articles for deletion (i.e., none of mine, yet). True, he forgot his password that one time, but I think he's got an e-mail address stored here now in case that happens again.  c • > • cunwapquc? 22:10, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
How is it favouritism? Read what is says above. We are going to have two more Admins from this round, KIY may well be one of them. Sannse already has the "power" to do whatever she wants on the site, we're merely making what she does official. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
Actually, it has been stated every time this comes up that sysopping will make a difference to what she does as opposed to staff. I don't want to seem like I'm dragging this out, but the "just making it official" line just doesn't work - what she does is already offical, because all she does is staff duties, not sysop duties. She's said it both times the sysop nomination has come up. And who decided this on the early sysopping anyway? How many admins/users were asked about it? It does indeed look just like a group of friends inviting another friend into "the club" regardless of any kind of "process" if you ask me. Bah, I always end up wrong in these things, but i feel it needs to be said. If we want to set up processes like this, at least follow them once set up! I've said before - I'm not opposed to sysopping sannse as such, I just like to see it done properly, by everyone in the community. Spang talk 23:45, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
That may be so, but you can view this as "fixing" an earlier mistake when we ignored our own internal process (as it was at that time) and counted non-Admin votes during the previous time she (and incidently you) were up for Opping. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
Meh, nobody complained then. And you still didn't say who decided/was asked about this in the first place. Spang talk 01:28, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Interesting situation. For the record, I did say appearance of favoritism, not favoritism (or even favouuuuritism) per se. For all I know, you could be doing this to punish poor Sannse, in a final, terrifying, grand-guignol effort to finally push her over the edge... I just think we should make it clear to anyone who isn't clear that Sannse is a major, longtime Wikipedia admin, who (like Dave Gerard) has considerable influence there, in addition to working for Wikia in some capacity. That appears to be where her support is coming from, and why. There's nothing wrong with that - indeed, y'all can do whatever you want (and to be fair, everyone seems to like Sannse quite a bit, AFAIK). But the question is, what are the chances you'd do that on behalf of someone who was known to be an outspoken critic of Wikipedia? Zero, right? Hence the appearance of favoritism, even though you may honestly feel that such a stance is perfectly justified, both practically and morally. Which reminds me, we should probably move this discussion to another page or even IRC, so as not to prejudice the rest of the proceedings.  c • > • cunwapquc? 01:42, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
For the record - and although, unlike last time, I don't have any reservations as to Sannse's Uncyclopediability - I echo Spang's sentiments. (Come on, you had to know that was coming.) —rc (t) 01:54, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
I hope no resentment or any type of negativity flows from these expressions of concern, but I too am somewhat worried about the transperency (or lack thereof) of various important decissions being made. ~ ⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|CM|+S 09:42, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
I was rather bothered by it, too. Everyone should have had their permissions changed at once - it's only fair. However, I cannot help noting that sannse has the third-highest vote count and people quit voting after the opp'ing, which bothers me more because the final count isn't going to be a real count. Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 03:31, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Please continue to vote on this nomination. Don't stop because she was opped; we want complete final scores. Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 18:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

She's great and well-proven, but she doesn't help with admin duties because she doesn't want to interfere with our community. I think she would make a great addition to the team and that she shouldn't need to be in a top-whatever, but just get sufficient admin support, since she could help out anyway. We could ceremonially make her an admin on uncyc...

Admins
  • Support Dawg
  • Support Spang
  • Support Mhaille
  • Support Tompkins
  • Support Captain Famine
  • Support Codeine
  • Support Hinoa
  • Support Bradaphraser "But this is my last for for a while!"
  • Support Insertwackynamehere
  • Support Keitei
  • Support Rad 15:59, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Users
  • Support Zombiebaron
  • Support zim_ulator (sannse rocks!)
  • Support Rataube
  • Support Imrealized
  • Support mowgli
  • Support Severian
  • Support kakun
  • Support Danius
  • Support Roger The Bum (wait, she ISN'T an admin?)
  • Support Sharkbait1986 (I coulda swore she was an admin too)
  • Support, says Mandaliet.
  • Support --User:Tom mayfair/Sig 13:02, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Wouldnt this be really, REALLY, pointless? She can do even more than admins already... -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 02:42, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Missed the ceremonially bit in the last sentence up there, eh? Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 02:48, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
    • No, I saw it, I still just think its pointless... If we add her, we should add 2 other admins as well, or else I'm opposed to this. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 03:06, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
      • entirely agree with sir cornbread. no point in burdening the already busy and no point in giving people ceremonious titles - for every title you ceremonially give you deny a potential candidate the job. being admin is serious, boring and thankless business and busy people like sannse or even chron for that matter should not be given these titles/jobs. -- mowgli 05:51, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
        • While entirely happy with Sannse being an admin, I stick to the point that if she becomes an admin, she takes up different tasks than those of a wikia staff member - As well as being a community support person thingy, she becomes a cleaner upper of crap etc. --The Rt. Hon. BarryC Icons-flag-gb MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 11:27, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
          • hmm, yeah, i'm coming around to changing my mind. maybe she isn't busy at all and is desperately seeking some assignment, any assignment. it's for us for propose, her to dispose etc. i doubt She'd accept it if She weren't going to spend time here. i'll vote. -- mowgli 12:34, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Guess I'd better comment here. I don't use my staff abilities unless asked to do so as part of my job... which generally means that I'm asked by an admin to do something they can't do themselves (checkuser, de-admin, blow the place up, blah blah) or there is an emergency and staff help is needed. Unless I am made an admin by the community it's not right for me, as a member of this community, to interfere with the running of this site (OK, OK, a little deletion once or twice, and that block was just a slip of the mouse, nobody's perfect). So yes, being an admin would change what I do around here, at least in my play-time visits. Clean up isn't something I would push my nose into as staff, but is something I'd do as an admin -- sannse@Wikia (talk) 15:51, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

  • yeah! sannse for admin of amerika. plis count my vote twice! (besides she's got an awfully awesome profile picture. i feel like i'm in love once again -- i thought love was bullshit but what does man know? do check it out guys -- gals stay away!!) -- mowgli 18:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
    • No way, man. Gals should check her out, too. Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 18:33, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Hindleyite (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

  • Opped With 23 Votes and no against. Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 16:26, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Aside from his regular appearances on the Featured Article and Featured Images list, Hindleyite is a prolific contributor to Uncyclopedia, as a quick glance at his Edit History will reveal. Heavily involved with sections of Uncyclopedia such as Reefer Desk, UnBooks and the Potatochopper of the Month Award. Always on hand to offer advice and assistance on talk pages throughout the site or on IRC.

Admins
  • Support Mhaille
  • Support Dawg
  • Support Codeine
  • Support Bradaphraser
  • Support Tompkins
  • Support Sikon
  • Support Spang 19:09, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Conditional Support As long as we don't lose Unbooks/Reefer work Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 18:55, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Support Insertwackynamehere
  • S'port Rad 16:00, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Users
  • Support Sir Cornbread
  • Support Ghelæ
  • Support Electrified mocha chinchilla
  • Support zim_ulator
  • Support --Shandon 00:53, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • SupportCzar Yah
  • Support sbluen
  • Support BarryC
  • Support Claudius Prime
  • Support sannse
  • Support --User:Tom mayfair/Sig 14:19, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Support Rataube
  • Support --HPSigHP talk KUN Icons-flag-pi 21:44, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Support Zombiebaron
  • Support ENeGMA
  • Support Keep up the good work. --Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 00:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Support Imrealized
  • Support Some user, jumpin' on the bandwagon
  • Support mowgli
  • Support Severian
  • Support KiY
  • Support kakun
  • Support --WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 06:23, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Support, Mandaliet!
  • Support Strangelv -- gambling he's too busy to go on an NRV rampage
  • Support --Icons-flag-us SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 15:57, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Zim_ulator (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

  • Opped With 23.5 Votes and no against. Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 16:26, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Another prolific contributor, the Reverend Zim has made his home as a writer and chief correspondant for our popular UnNews section and our Podcast service. His dulcet tones can be heard on the vast majority of news articles. A quick search on talk pages throughout the site will reveal his ramblings friendly banter and sparkling wit, as well as his ability to offer help to those in need.

Admins
  • Support Mhaille
  • Support Dawg
  • Support Codeine
  • Support Bradaphraser
  • Support Tompkins
  • Support Chronarion
  • Support Sikon
  • Support Spang 19:09, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Conditional Support As long as we don't lose UnNews work Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 18:56, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Support Keitei
  • Support Insertwackynamehere
  • Support Rad 16:01, 1 September 2006 (UTC) - Let's make him head of the UnNews Department.
Users
  • Support Ghelæ
  • Support Composure1
  • Support Jtaylor1
  • Support Hindleyite
  • Support sannse
  • Support --HPSigHP talk KUN Icons-flag-pi 21:45, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Support Crazyswordsman
  • Support Zombiebaron
  • Support He does good work. - ENeGMA
  • Support Electrified mocha chinchilla
  • Support I like what he's done. Evil Jesus is brilliant. --Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel)

00:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Support kakun
  • Support Imrealized
  • Support shame he isn't one already - mowgli
  • Support somewhat suprised that this hasn't happened. BarryC
  • Support Severian
  • Support KiY
  • Support Olipro
  • Support Mordillo
  • Support Kenmcfa
  • Support sbluen
  • Support... Mandaliet...
  • Support --User:Tom mayfair/Sig 13:03, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Support 190.50.160.225 Invalid - no edit history outside this page.
Comments

I am so hugely flattered being nommed and supported by all these fine folks. All those nommed here are great people, and all deserve this recognition at least as much, and probably more than, me. The only reservation about me is that I may disappear for a few days at a time when my back gets particularly nasty. These phenomena are unpredictable, so if that might be a problem, it should be considered. Thanks to all who voted and all who are in the running. Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 20:49, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

What about when your front gets nasty? (bump) Oh, I mean moreso than normal. (ka-ching) TY, I'll be here...forever. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 01:26, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
My front ain't nobody's business but my own. Well, my wife, of course. And my doctor. Oh, hell, go ahead and take a look if you must. Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 15:48, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

King_In_Yellow (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Ignoring his AWFUL User Page, King in Yellow is a more than frequent visitor to our Vote for Deletion and Ban Patrol pages, natters away on the Forum pages like an old woman, and generally seems to appear just about everywhere.

Admins
  • Support Mhaille
  • Support Codeine
  • Support Tompkins
  • Support Hinoa
  • Support Spang 19:09, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Support Insertwackynamehere
Users
  • Support Ghelæ
  • Against., fairly inactive lately. -Sir Cornbread
  • For. Sorry, Support. FreeMorpheme 00:39, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Support Some user
  • Support Crazyswordsman
  • Strong Support Imrealized
  • Support Rataube
  • Support sbluen
  • Support Severian
  • Support Hindleyite
  • Support --W.E. Sapphire 04:24, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Support RichmondSuperking
  • Support --User:Tom mayfair/Sig 13:03, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Support Put a Dalek in as admin! --2nd_Lt Orion Blastar (talk) 15:15, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Are we allowing Against votes? Just curious... KiY doesn't have much of an article-writing record here, but I don't see that as much of a drawback. - Some User 00:44, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

  • I'm afraid KIY belongs to the "Kill anything that moves" Ghelae school. Maybe we have alredy too many deletionist admins, and we need more of the "noob friendly" type. Rataube 17:38, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
    • Actually, I think KiY's better than Ghae. And I used to belong to the "delete everything" school of thought until I was sysopped. Getting opped made me hesitate before deleting stuff. This may have the same effect on KiY. H.
      • As did I... it's a good way to get recognized at first, but after awhile I think people realize that alot of being an administrator has to do with being part of the community, not just what maintenance work you do. I think you may have some experience with this philosophy yourslef, Rataube... :) Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 01:24, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
        • My expirience was a little different, I had to rise my deletionist feelings to balance the more "Absolutely everything has potential" school. But I get your ponit and I think you are right, along with the powers comes the responsability.---Asteroid B612B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 17:14, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
          • Sorry I haven't been as active lately, but changing jobs + death in (wife's) family has a tendency to curtail one's free time. And for the record, I haven't been on any rootin-tootin killing sprees since last autumn, when BobBobBob and Splaka had to cut my meds. I do intend to actually make some content contributions again someday, and maybe even author a few original pieces of utter shit. Thanks to all who've voted thus far; thou art indeed dear to me. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:47, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
            • P.S. Is my page really that awful? Sorry, I'm rather inept when it comes to the vagaries of formatting, and I can't help what strikes me as funny.
              • Well, there ya go! Please convey our personal condolences to your spouse, of course... And really, your user page has looked a lot worse in the past than it does now. IMO, if you just moved the OH NOES cat up closer to the top, and the userboxes to the bottom, heh heh... then you'd get sysopped fer shuuurrr!  c • > • cunwapquc? 01:48, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
                • KiY voted to delete some of my articles, but has offered interesting comments and contributions. I think KiY has Admin material and the Dalek schtick makes better sense if he is an admin. Exterminate articles and all of that. Sorry to hear about the death in his family.--2nd_Lt Orion Blastar (talk) 15:15, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Zombiebaron (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

I promised. Also he's bored and does the NRV stuff and isn't nearly as immature as he was some six months ago (or more, I forget... what with this... old... age... yes...). --KATIE!! 00:13, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Admins
  • Support Keitei
  • Support Carlb
  • Support Tompkins
  • Support Spang
  • Support Insertwackynamehere
  • Support Mhaille
Users
  • Support mowgli
  • Support Ghelæ
  • Support kakun
  • Support Severian
  • Support Absolutely deserves it. - ENeGMA
  • Support Hindleyite
  • Support Kenmcfa
  • Support, but look at the rules or ask before you do something new. sbluen
  • Support Imrealized
  • Support OpenFaceSurgery
  • Support NXWave
  • Support --User:Tom mayfair/Sig 13:03, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Support Mordillo (hell, this place needs a Jewish admin to complete our world domination agenda...)
  • Support Naughtyned
Comments
  • checked his "contribs." good community spirit - sends out a lot of "welcome" msgs to new users + reverting, editing etc. THE ideal candidate. -- mowgli 06:05, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Against All

I'm too lazy to go through each one. I think everybody should be de-opped except for me, and then I'll ban everybody and delete every page that's not mine. -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 05:25, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

For. Spang talk 06:43, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Ehh, why not.    c • > • cunwapquc? 07:06, 1 September 2006 (UTC) after all, there's already a preview...
For, because I'm not nominated! --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 08:33, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Jesus Christ! (simultaneously titled, "Comments")

so you've selected 3 admins out of 5? excuse me but what are you trying to prove? would heaven have fallen if you hadn't opped all 5 of them? i say this cause all 5 were deserving (the ones excluded were more deserving perhaps). I agree that there are many more deserving candidates (perhaps even more deserving than this bunch) waiting in the wings. without prejudice to that fact, what's the point in holding this nail-biting bull-fight (literally bull) of a travesty when all you intended to do, in the first place, was simply kick two out of an equal-in-all-respects bunch of 5 by specious, arbitrary voting? all this hoopla might have been justified were you attempting something like 1 out of 5 candidates (not counting ma'am sannse)! what i mean is that non-admins (public) should vote on the discussion page of this forum for candidates that make it to here and a voted candidate should then believe that he/she now has an about 99% chance (ok make it 97% if it makes you happy) of being opped and this forum should be restricted to voting by admins for negative votes only, ergo. admins should explain why not they want him/her opped! involving non-admins here makes it seem democratic but it isn't for it hasn't been applied the right way. you guys have got it all backwards. pretty stupid! -- mowgli 18:02, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Mowgli! Cut down on the java...take a deep breath, and recite the mantra, "Un..Cy..Clo..Pe..De..Ahhhhh...". I'm pretty sure that this is the first time that it's been done like this...if you expect perfection the first time out, you're guaranteed disappointment. Next time they'll tweak the formula...soon it will be perfect. Then, eventually, you'll get nommed for admin and will be soundly thrashed for using too much bold text back in 2006.
“I've said it before, and I'll say it again: democracy just doesn't work”
~ Obligatory Simpson's Quote on Democracy
.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:42, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
  • i understand and i understand o so well! so how long till i get nommed for admin? i'm joking!! joke! joke! god help me! i really don't want to be admin! shoo! go away freak!
  • but yeah, someone (among the admins) tried to be democratic. *clap clap* the intention counts and it's laudable!!!! let it be an invaluable example or "show-how" for new admins (and the incumbents). -- mowgli 19:24, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Whoa, chill bro. Seriously. We created a new rule due to this vote. We probably won't have another vote for...oh...about the same amount of time as last time, somewhere around 3+ months. We very seldom add admins to this site, so every time it has been different (except the first couple times, where it was the same, but that was because the community was about 15 people, about 8 of whom were regulars, and almost all over which were admins anyway). Also, if just getting on this page meant auto-admin, then the only people with a say would be 3 out of 40+ admins, which is even worse. Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 19:29, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Also, mowgli, didn't your mother teach you "If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all"? Not that we're always nice, but a negative vote would be an absolute disaster of hate and hurt feelings. It must be a positive vote - a feel good that someone noticed you and likes you type thing. I take it you weren't in on the discussion about this, either. We are not a democracy, we are an oligarchy. We are not a court, we are a group with a common goal. We are not a company, we are a group of friends. There is no hard-fast rule we can't bend nor any we can't break, but admins are people that agree on the rules and have demonstrated to the admins that they understand the nature, purpose, and rules of uncyclopedia, as well as having a compatible personality. Just roll with it and accept it. Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 20:32, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
yeah i agree. neg. votes would spread hate -- my mom did did teach me that. i wasn't really clued into the discussion on the discusion page, you're right. and yeah, uncyc. is nether a democracy nor an oligarchy. we are what wikipedia isn't and can never be: a college fraternity, lamda lambda pie! that might morph into a sorority any moment, without notice, and all brothers will be called sisters, lol! cheers! lets spread more sisterly love -- mowgli 03:22, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
I'm not part of any group of friends, I hate you all! Spang talk 00:37, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
I actually thought we were a group of fiends, not "friends." Of course, I hate myself.  c • > • cunwapquc? 07:26, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Mowgli ftl!--General Salt 23:47, 1 September 2006 (UTC)


General Salt (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

  • For. Against. Dammit, he just sporked Wikipedia's article on Roman Emperor Septimius Severus for his own user page, with barely a single substantive alteration. And I had such high hopes for him...  c • > • cunwapquc? 18:59, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For 'cos he's got win and stuff -- i think -- i'm not sure -- just a guess -- anyway it's for for whatever we are voting for -- mowgli 21:14, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects