Forum:Vote for 1 week VFD renomination rule

Forums: Index > Village Dump > Vote for 1 week VFD renomination rule

Note: This topic has been unedited for 1964 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

I'm starting a vote to see if the VFD renom rule passes.

Score: +1

• For. -- We need to prevent renominations by the second. --NXWave 22:41, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
• Abstain and Conditional For - only if it's longer than a week as a week isn't long enough (/me thinks 3 months)--Æ 22:43, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Comment. Me thinks 3 months is too much, riots may break out and angry patrons may get restless. --NXWave 23:19, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

• I vote common sense, as in people should use that, as opposed to forcing people to sift through tons of guidelines. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:37, Dec 31
• I vote for a "quasi-deleted" template and category. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 01:39, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

  Actually, we already have those, technically. Template:oldvfd and Category:Deletion Survivor. They may not really be for quasi-deletion, but we really don't need more templates cluttering up VFD that nobody uses. Happy New Years! Shouldn't I be partying? PEEING 02:48, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

• For. -- Unfortunately not everyone has common sense. It's a small rule it shouldn't cause to much trouble.--Scott 03:52, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
• For. It makes sense to me. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 04:37, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
• Abstain for reasons of who the fuck are you, anyway? -- Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 16:45, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
• What if we just blank half of the article? That way, everybody wins! • Spang • ☃ • talk • 18:29, 01 Jan 2008

  For. Happy New Years! Shouldn't I be partying? PEEING 02:48, 2 January 2008 (UTC)