Forum:Vote Kalir for Grand High Pastamancer

Forums: Index > BHOP > Vote Kalir for Grand High Pastamancer

Note: This topic has been unedited for 1932 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

If so elected, I will summon delicious noodles for all, blast trolls to Hey Deze and back with cones of ex-girlfriends, disarm the terrorists of their pants, and bomb every last one of your computers. Thank you, and good luck. Ж Kalir _{totally not Wario at all} 03:36, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

For

Score: +3 hundred and fifty fag

1. LIEKWOA Ж Kalir _{totally not Wario at all} 03:36, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
2. FOAR what are yew, pastaphobic? --_^(sir)Fag!chat|pee|fail|vote! 11:49, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
3. O RLY? -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 13:32, Feb. 5, 2008

Not for

Score: +2

1. OMGNOWAI Ж Kalir _{totally not Wario at all} 03:36, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
2. Against Kalir's pastamancing is sub-par at best. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:37, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Abstain

Score: +1

1. I'm watching my carbs. They haven't done anything so far. They're just waiting for me to fall asleep, probably. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 18:52, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Comment. - HAHA how do you think up this stuff Modus? (Bonner) (Talk) Feb 5, 19:03

Also comment. The back of cereal boxes. It's all right there, man. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 19:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Also also comment: You're right, you know. This one time I had this feeling like I was being watched, and then I fell asleep, and when I woke up I was wearing different clothes. And the clothes hadn't even been washed! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:35, Feb 5

Against Boomsta's ability to just haphazardly remove Squiggle's patriotic right to participate in the democratic process that is otherwise known as voting.

Score: +2.8 angered throttler

1. For Boomsta's vote-rigging is sub-par at best. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:37, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
2. For The bastard not only does the cliched "self-for" in an insulting nomination while talking in the third person, he also took two tries to properly remove Squiggle's patriotic right to participate in the democratic process that is otherwise known as voting. What kind of incompetent bastard is this? Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:48, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Armageddon

Score: +1

• For. - Suits me (Bonner) (Talk) Feb 5, 18:54

Another choice of some kind

Score: 0

• Nom. I can't believe he hasn't won this yet, etc. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 18:58, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Against no double negatives

Score: -???

Against. people being against not having double negatives. This is getting awfully confusing, isn't it? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:38, Feb 5

Really? I find that this isn't not getting confusing. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:43, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

I not another neither. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:46, Feb 5