Forum:VFS rules

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Index > Ministry of Love > VFS rules
Note: This topic has been unedited for 3290 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

Gents, let's make a joint decision about the updated VFS policy. Main update is:

  • At least a +3 margin is required for the VFS process to commence.
  • Each VFS is for one admin unless specifically decided before the second round.
  • The pinkish background is a clear sign that the apocalypse's is upon us.

If anyone has alternate suggestions - please place them here. This update will take place starting the next month. ~Jewriken.GIF 15:28, 12 July 2008 (UTC)


  • Well, I'm for all that stuff, except the wording on the second point is a bit strange - I only meant to make it so that if there were to be only one candidate coming out of the third round, there is no fourth round (if my little clause changed it in some other way, then that's not what I meant to do). Also, that background is purple. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:11, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Hmmm... I'm gonna say against. A margin of three is quite a bit when we only have 8 or so active ops, and I don't want to risk getting stranded by indecision. Also, I'd personally prefer getting two ops each time--I feel like it makes it easier for whoever's getting all the new powers to have another person to gripe about all the work and generally act like a noob with. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 17:46, Jul 12
    I'm ever so lonely. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:10, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
  • For. A page on VFH shouldn't pass with +3, a vote on VFS shouldn't pass with +1. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:10, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Let's make it officialish ~Jewriken.GIF 10:00, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Any margin will do for the first VFS round

Score: +2
  • Jaa, per what I said already. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:32, Jul 14
  • Symbol for vote For. per Led. Only nine ops voted for this round, when clearly more knew about it. I don't care what the Supreme Court says, silence should imply consent. — Sir Manticore progress-wheel.gif 06:12, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

A +3 margin is needed for the first VFS round

Score: +4
  • For. Mmmmm, margarine... Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:51, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
  • For; its not like I'm going to change my opinion the third time that I vote for this... -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:33, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote Yay! My vote makes plus three! Now it automatically passes!--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 21:59, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol against vote Against. I actually agree with this, but I just want to spite Brad. Spang talk 04:57, 14 Jul 2008
  • I always do what Mhaille says. Unless Codeine say otherwise. ~Jewriken.GIF 15:28, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol for vote For. I actually agree with this and also I wanted to spite Spang. —rc (t) 20:31, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

VFS is always for two admins unless decided so beforehand

Score: +1
  • Symbol for vote For. Unless the bureaucrat only want one though. Or whatever. I'm easy to please. — Sir Manticore progress-wheel.gif 06:08, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

VFS is always for one admin unless decided so beforehand

Score: 0
  • Comment, I'm not sure where this idea comes from, in all honesty. The three things that I changed when I was creating Template:VFSrules were the +3 margin, the "gay purple background/border", and the fact that if only one candidate were to move on from the third round, there would be no fourth round. Therefore, we are only limited to one admin if the "user vote round" only produces one candidate, and I'm not sure how we could get two candidates out of a VFS if the "user vote round" produced only one candidate. Basically. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:36, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment - this nothing to do with your pinkish updates. This is coming out of the fact that we never took a decision if VFS is automatically for two or one admins. I think that unless we're having a particularly bad month, it should be for one. We can also decide on making that decision during the first VFS round. ~Jewriken.GIF 15:30, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
  • I think that how we've done it in the past though, right (during the initial round, that is)? It seems to work fine, except when none of the majority of admins who support more ops declare how many ops they are supporting. So, yeah, declaring that kind of stuff should be politely encouraged. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 18:43, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

The Purplish background is the gayest thing you've ever witnessed

Score: +2
Personal tools