Forum:VFH dramas

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 19:53, May 26, 2009 by The Woodburninator (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > VFH dramas
Note: This topic has been unedited for 1974 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.
Cabal

Cabal announcement #3414

I've noticed a new trend recently of very long and dramatic discussions in VFH where against votes cannot pass without four other people giving a whole lecture about what's wrong or right about that vote, and those discussions eventually escalate into dramas.


So hereby is the cabal decree X452/89: NO MORE VFH DRAMAS. If you absolutely must say something about a specific vote, you can discuss it, nicely, with the voter or on the VFH talk page. Just remember, against votes are legitimate and it is everyone's right to vote against something.


If you believe an against vote is unwarranted, invalid or problematic for some reason, talk to an admin, don't start a whole discussion on the voting page.


Note to those who vote against: as a side note, I encourage you to give honest reasons, NICELY. meh, shit, crap, worst thing I ever saw is not a vote that will encourage the writer to further work on the article. Be nice, we're all trying to write humor in the end of the day.


Thank you citizens, we shall now return to our regular programs.

~Jewriken.GIF 14:12, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

I agree with what you're saying. Endless VFH discussions were getting a bit annoying (such as in the Great Britain incident), and as much as it frustrates me when someone votes against something I vote for, and vice versa, I guess I just have to get over myself. /rant. Saberwolf116 16:19, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Well, if somebody does give a reason like "this sucks" or "I don't like your username" it really should not count. I don't care about my articles, but when people do that to a new user: god damn.   Le Cejak <16:24 May 25, 2009>
I tend to agree with Cajek. And also with this cabal decree, things were kinda getting out of hand. Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:32, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
PinkRangerMorpher

Too late, Saberwolf116! Trademarked catchphrase, activate!™ Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:41, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Okay, I didn't read anything that you wrote but...is it still okay to go apeshit over against votes? If not, is it still okay to friggin' lose it over them? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:06, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
from what I understand, not only is it ok Modus, it is strongly suggested that you go apeshit over against votes Icons-flag-pi Pirate Lord__Sonic80 (Yell  •  Latest literary excretion) __ 17:09, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Against. Meh. Spang talk 17:07, 25 May 2009
/me dresses up as Pink Power Ranger to illustrate just how apeshit the above against vote drove me Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:13, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Strong against. Shit. Saberwolf116 18:18, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Me dresses up as the blue power ranger as that is a legitimate reason for whoreing my article which everyone loved and got no against votes. Also on a more serious note I do agree with Mordillo but on the other hand I do think discussion of any vote can be helpful, and perhaps newer users (and even us of the established) don't think of using the VFH talk page. ~Orian57~ Icons-flag-gb ~Talk~ Gay sign 23:03 25 May 2009
Symbol against vote Against. per above. --Mnb'z 03:35, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Awwww! Come on Mordillo! I WUNNA MAKE DRAMA ON VFH! COME ON RALPHIE! WHHHAAAAAAAAA! Woody On Fire! Wood burningTalking Woody Stalking Woody 19:53, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects