Forum:User Dispute Turned Nasty

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Index > Ministry of Love > User Dispute Turned Nasty
Note: This topic has been unedited for 2541 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.
Cannon

CANNON YOU DICK

I Pee Reviewed a rather terrible article. Then when Conservation week started I decided to redo it. Then this whole dispute started (see Talk:Anti Kitten Huffing Movement). At first it was (kind of civil) but the User:DarkBlue decided to abuse me on my talk page (I copied it to article talk). I decided rather than just abuse him back I'd let the Cabal sort this out (please). -- erudite Ape (mollify) (Riot Porn) 20:44, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

My opinion? He was out of line with his remarks, no doubt about it. But take a look at your original pee review, the way you addressed the article doesn't really count as "creative criticism". You were a bit destructive with your review, even if the article was very bad. How about you two just remove all of that correspondence and shake hands? Or set a midnight dual like gentlemen should? I'll stand as your second. ~Jewriken.GIF 21:31, 11 September 2007 (UTC)


20 paces and revolvers, I say, just like our forefathers! I'll be the one selling tickets. Or you could talk it out, but I doubt I'd sell any tickets to that. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:00, Sep 11, 2007

You would if you promised free beer and hookers. -- erudite Ape (mollify) (Riot Porn) 22:07, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
YOU AND YOU CAPITALISTIC TENDENCIES ARE ALL GOING TO BE DEALT WITH AS SOON AS WE SET A PROPER SYSTEM AROUND HERE, COMRADES. ~Jewriken.GIF 07:16, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
We can fix this with Communism. SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle
Aye, send everyone involved to the gulag. ~Jewriken.GIF 21:41, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

OK, my Pee Review was pretty scathing - it was also true and I did offer some suggestions. I'm prepared to shake hands and all that nonsense but what about the article itself? It's clearly no good as it is and really it was no good originally. But I can understand why the others don't want their stuff replaced. Advice? -- erudite Ape (mollify) (Riot Porn) 21:51, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Doesn't really matter if it's true, as soon as the author sees "THIS IS BLOODY HORRIBLE" he's not going to read any further. Think of yourself receiving this kind of pee for one of your articles. As for the article itself, I posted it on VFD. You could start another called "Parents Against Kitten Huffing" or something...~Jewriken.GIF 07:16, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

I'm disappointed

Going by the forum title, I thought this was going to be like "Girls gone wild". From what I hear, those videos have girls. And they're going wild. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Yeah well you suck. Bad. Spang talk 10:36, 12 Sep 2007
I saw him drinking a softy once. He sucks good. ~Jewriken.GIF 11:32, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
That's actually from my video series, Mo goes mild. In Mo goes mild II I read a book. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:44, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Well, how was the book? I'm on the edge of my seat! In fact, I'm liable fall off if not given this information right away! P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 19:03, Sep 12, 2007
Personal tools
projects